1532-2890/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=d833098325c9f1060bcbee51adf276c155608167)
1532-2890/asset/olbannercenter.gif?v=1&s=661179918edb4fa732edfd3408eb050a6ce87809)
1532-2890/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=1ef8a363944134c502cbffa1937878a71b4cc635)
Research Article
Not all lies are spontaneous: An examination of deception across different modes of communication
Article first published online: 29 SEP 2011
DOI: 10.1002/asi.21648
© 2011 ASIS&T
Issue
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
Volume 63, Issue 1, pages 208–216, January 2012
Additional Information
How to Cite
Whitty, M. T., Buchanan, T., Joinson, A. N. and Meredith, A. (2012), Not all lies are spontaneous: An examination of deception across different modes of communication. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci., 63: 208–216. doi: 10.1002/asi.21648
Publication History
- Issue published online: 13 DEC 2011
- Article first published online: 29 SEP 2011
- Manuscript Revised: 2 AUG 2011
- Manuscript Accepted: 2 AUG 2011
- Manuscript Received: 18 FEB 2011
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Abstract
An online diary study was performed to investigate deception across different media. One hundred and four individuals participated in the study, with 76 completing the diaries. Individuals were most likely to lie on the telephone. Planned lies, which participants also rated the most serious, were more likely told via SMS (short message service) text messaging. Most lies were told to people participants felt closest to. The feature-based model provides a better account of the deceptions reported by participants than do media richness theory or social distance theory. However, the authors propose a reworked feature-based model to explain deception across different media. They suggest that instant messaging should be treated as a near synchronous mode of communication. We suggest that the model needs to distinguish between spontaneous and planned lies.