SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Abbott, A. (1997). Of time and space: The contemporary relevance of the Chicago School. Social Forces, 75(4), 11491182.
  • Aglietta, M. (1979). A theory of capitalist regulation: The US experience. London: New Left Books.
  • Agre, P., & Schuler, D. (1997). Reinventing technology, rediscovering community: Critical explorations of computing as a social practice. Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
  • Ainsworth, J. (2002). Why does it take a village? The mediation of neighborhood effects on educational achievement. Social Forces, 81(1), 117152.
  • Alder, G. (2001). Hierarchical linear models. New York: Macmillan.
  • Alexander, J.C. (1998). Neofunctionalism and after. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  • Alkalimat, A., & Williams, K. (2001). Social capital and cyberpower in the African American community: A case study of a community technology center in the dual city. In L. Keeble & B. Loader (Eds.), Community informatics: Shaping computer mediated social relations. London: Routledge.
  • Allen, J.C., & Dillman, D.A. (1994). Against all odds: Rural community in the information age. Boulder, CO: Westview.
  • Anthony, C. (2010). Building community: Bit by byte. In K. Williams (Ed.), eChicago 2009: Cybernavigating our cultures (pp. 99108). Champaign, IL: University of Illnois at Urbana-Champaign.
  • Bates, F.L., & Bacon, L. (1972). The community as a social system. Social Forces, 50(3), 371379.
  • Bauman, Z. (2001). Community: Seeking safety in an insecure world. Cambridge, England: Polity/Blackwell.
  • Becker, S., Crandall, M.D., Fisher, K.E., Kinney, B., Landry, C.F., & Rocha, A. (2010). Opportunity for all: How the American public benefits from Internet access at U.S. libraries. Retrieved from http://tascha.washington.edu/usimpact
  • Bennett, L. (2006). Community power applied: Chicago's engagement with 21st century globalization. Sociological Imagination, 42(2), 6582.
  • Bernard, J. (1973). The sociology of community. Glenview, IL: Scott.
  • Bertot, J.C., Jaeger, P.T., & McClure, C.R. (2011). Public libraries and the Internet: Roles, perspectives, and implications. Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimited.
  • Bertot, J.C., McClure, C.R., & Jaeger, P.T. (2008). The impacts of free public Internet access on public library patrons and communities. Library Quarterly, 78(3), 285301.
  • Bishop, A.P., & Bruce, B. (2005). Community informatics: Integrating action, research and learning. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 31(6), 610.
  • Blanchard, T., & Matthews, T.L. (2006). The configuration of local economic power and civic participation in the global economy. Social Forces, 84(4), 22412257.
  • Blau, P.M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.
  • Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Borgida, E., Sullivan, J.L., Oxendine, A., Jackson, M.S., Riedel, E., & Gangl, A. (2002). Civic culture meets the digital divide: The role of community electronic networks. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 125141.
  • Bridger, J.C., Luloff, A.E., & Krannich, R.S. (2002). Community change and community theory. In A.E. Luloff & R.S. Krannich (Eds.), Persistence and change in rural communities (pp. 921). New York: CABI.
  • Brint, S. (2001). Gemeinschaft revisited: A critique and reconstruction of the community concept. Sociological Theory, 19(1), 123.
  • Brown, D.L. (2002). Migration and community: Social networks in a multilevel world. Rural Sociology, 67(1), 123.
  • Brown, G., & Maycock, B. (2005). Different spaces, same faces: Perth gay men's experiences of sexuality, risk and HIV. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 7(1), 5972.
  • Buckland, M.K. (1991). Information as thing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(5), 351360.
  • Burrows, R., & Ellison, N. (2004). Sorting places out? Towards a social politics of neighbourhood informatization. Information, Communication & Society, 7(3), 321336.
  • Burrows, R., & Gane, N. (2006). Geodemographics, software and class. Sociology, 40(5), 793812.
  • Caidi, N., Allard, D., & Quirke, L. (2010). Information practices of immigrants. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 44, 493591.
  • Canada Policy Research Initiative. (2005). Social capital as a public policy resource. Ottawa: Author.
  • Case, D.O. (2006). Information behavior. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 40, 293356.
  • Castells, M. (1989). The informational city: Information technology, economic restructuring, and the urban-regional process. New York: Blackwell.
  • Castells, M. (2009). The rise of the network society. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Castells, M. (2011). A network theory of power. International Journal of Communication, 5, 773787.
  • Charon, J.M. (1998). Symbolic interactionism: An introduction, an interpretation, an integration (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Chatman, E.A. (1999). A theory of life in the round. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(3), 207217.
  • Clark, L.S. (2003). Challenges of social good in the world of Grand Theft Auto and Barbie: A case study of a community computer center for youth. New Media & Society, 5(1), 95116.
  • Clement, A., & Shade, L. (1998). The access rainbow: Conceptualizing universal access to the information/communications infrastructure. University of Toronto Faculty of Information Studies Working Papers 10. Retreived from http://archive.iprp.ischool.utoronto.ca/publications/wp/wp10.html
  • Cohen, A.P. (1982). Belonging: Identity and social organisation in British rural cultures. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
  • Cohill, A., & Kavanaugh, A. (1997). Community networks: Lessons from Blacksburg, Virginia. Boston: Artech.
  • Colclough, G., & Sitaraman, B. (2005). Community and social capital: What is the difference? Sociological Inquiry, 75(4), 474496.
  • Coleman, J.S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(Suppl), S95S120.
  • Collins, R. (2004). Interaction ritual chains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Connell, D.J. (2004). Observing community: An inquiry into the meaning of community based on Luhmann's General Theory of Society (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Guelph, Canada.
  • Cook, K.S., & Whitmeyer, J.M. (1992). Two approaches to social structure: Exchange theory and network analysis. Annual Review of Sociology, 18, 109127.
  • Dalton, J.H., Elias, M.J., & Wandersman, A. (2007). Community psychology: Linking individuals and communities. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
  • Davis, D.M. (2011). Public library funding: An overview and discussion. In J.C. Bertot, P.T. Jaeger, & C.R. McClure (Eds.), Public libraries and the Internet: Roles, perspectives, and implications. Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimited.
  • Dawson, E.M., & Chatman, E.A. (2001). Reference group theory with implications for information studies: A theoretical essay. Information Research, 6(3), paper 105.
  • Day, P., & Schuler, D. (2004). Community practice in the network society: Local action, global interaction. London: Routledge.
  • Delanty, G. (2004). Community. London: Routledge.
  • Diaz, D.R. (2005). Barrio urbanism: Chicanos, planning, and American cities. New York: Routledge.
  • DiMaggio, P., & Hargittai, E. (2001). From the ‘digital divide’ to ‘digital inequality’: Studying Internet use as penetration increases (Working Paper 15). Princeton, NJ: Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies, Princeton University. Retrieved from http://www.princeton.edu/∼artspol/workpap15.html
  • Domhoff, G.W. (2007). C. Wright Mills, Floyd Hunter, and 50 years of power structure research. Michigan Sociological Review, 21, 154.
  • Durkheim, E. (1960). The division of labour in society. Glencoe, IL: Free Press. (Original work published 1893)
  • Durrance, J.C., & Pettigrew, K.E. (2002). Online community information: Creating a nexus at your library. Chicago, IL: American Library Association.
  • Durrance, J.C., Souden, M., Walker, D., & Fisher, K.E. (2006). Community problem-solving framed as a distributed information use environment: Bridging research and practice. Information Research, 11(4), paper 262.
  • Emerson, R.M. (1990). Social exchange theory. In M. Rosenberg & R.H. Turner (Eds.), Sociological perspectives on social psychology (pp. 3065). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
  • Ferlander, S. (2003). The Internet, social capital and local community (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Stirling, England.
  • Field, J. (2003). Social capital. New York: Routledge.
  • Fischer, C.S. (1975). Toward a subcultural theory of urbanism. American Journal of Sociology, 80(6), 13191341.
  • Fisher, K.E., & Julien, H. (2009). Information behavior. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 43, 317358.
  • Flint, C.G., & Luloff, A.E. (2005). Natural resource-based communities, risk, and disaster: An intersection of theories. Society & Natural Resources, 18(5), 399412.
  • Flora, J.L. (1998). Social capital and communities of place. Rural Sociology, 63(4), 481506.
  • Fong, T.P. (1994). The first suburban Chinatown: The remaking of Monterey Park, California. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
  • Gardner, R.O. (2004). The portable community: Mobility and modernization in Bluegrass festival life. Symbolic Interaction, 27(2), 155178.
  • Goldschmidt, W.R. (1946). Small business and the community: Study in central valley of California on effects of scale of farm operations. Washington, DC: United States Senate, Special Committee to Study Problems of American Small Business.
  • Goodman, P. (1960). Communitas: Means of livelihood and ways of life. New York: Vintage.
  • Gottdiener, M., & Hutchison, R. (2011). The new urban sociology. Boulder, CO: Westview.
  • Graham, S. (2002). Bridging urban digital divides? Urban polarisation and information and communications technologies (ICTs). Urban Studies, 39(1), 3356.
  • Graham, S., & Marvin, S. (2001). Splintering urbanism: Networked infrastructures, technological mobilities and the urban condition. London: Routledge.
  • Gurstein, M. (2000). Community informatics enabling communities with information and communications technologies. Hershey, PA.: Idea Group.
  • Gusfield, J.R. (1975). Community: A critical response. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Hague, B., & Loader, B. (1999). Digital democracy: Discourse and decision making in the information age. London: Routledge.
  • Hall, H. (2003). Borrowed theory: Applying exchange theories in information science research. Library & Information Science Research, 25(3), 287306.
  • Hampton, K. N. (2007). Neighborhoods in the network society: The e-neighbors study. Information, Communication, and Society, 10(5), 714748.
  • Harvey, D. (1994). Flexible accumulation through urbanization: Reflections on ‘post-modernism’ in the American city. In A. Amin (Ed.), Post-Fordism: A reader (pp. 361386). Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Hawley, A. (1986). Human ecology: A theoretical essay. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Haythornthwaite, C., & Hagar, C. (2005). The social world of the web. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 39, 311346.
  • Heinlein, E. (2007). Genealogy and the economic drain on Ireland: Unintended consequences. First Monday, 12. Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue12_1/heinlen/index.html
  • Hewitt, J.P. (2003). Symbols, objects and meanings. In L.T. Reynolds & N.J. Herman-Kinney (Eds.), Handbook of symbolic interactionism (pp. 307326). Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.
  • Hjørland, B. (2002). Epistemology and the socio-cognitive perspective in information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(4), 257270.
  • Holloway, L., & Hubbard, P. (2001). People and place: The extraordinary geographies of everyday life. New York: Prentice Hall.
  • Hopper, P. (2003). Rebuilding communities in an age of individualism. Hampshire: Ashgate.
  • Israel, B.A. (1985). Social networks and social support: Implications for natural helper and community level interventions. Health Education Quarterly, 12(1), 6580.
  • Johnson, C.A. (2005). Nan Lin's theory of social capital. In K.E. Fisher, S. Erdelez, & E.F. McKechnie (Eds.), Theories of information behavior: A researcher's guide (pp. 323327). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
  • Johnson, C.A. (2007). Social capital and the search for information: Examining the role of social capital in information seeking behavior in Mongolia. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 58(6), 883894.
  • Johnson, C.A. (2010). Do public libraries contribute to social capital?: A preliminary investigation into the relationship. Library & Information Science Research, 32(2), 147155.
  • Karp, D.A., Stone, G.P., & Yoels, W.C. (1991). Being urban: A sociology of city life. New York: Praeger.
  • Kaufman, H.F. (1959). Toward an interactional conception of community. Social Forces, 38(1), 817.
  • Kempers, M. (2002). Community matters: An exploration of theory and practice. Chicago: Burnham.
  • Kusenbach, M.B. (2003). Neighboring: An ethnographic study of community in urban Hollywood (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, Los Angeles.
  • Kvasny, L. (2006). Cultural (re)production of digital inequality in a US community technology initiative. Information, Communication & Society, 9(2), 160181.
  • Lash, S. (2002). Critique of information. London: Sage.
  • Lefebvre, H., Brenner, N., & Elden, S. (2009). State, space, world: Selected essays. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Lenstra, N. (2011). E-Black Champaign-Urbana: Community informatics and cultural heritage information in a low-income African-American community. Champaign, IL: UIUC.
  • Letiche, H., & van Mens, L. (2003). Dyslogistic information ecologies. Management Learning, 34(3), 329347.
  • Lievrouw, L.A. (1998). Our own devices: Heterotropic communication, discourse and culture in the Information Society. The Information Society, 16, 8396.
  • Lievrouw, L.A. (2001). New media and the ‘pluralization of life-worlds’: A role for information in social differentiation. New Media & Society, 3(1), 728.
  • Liff, S., & Steward, F. (2001). Community e-gateways: Locating networks and learning for social inclusion. Information, Communication & Society, 4(3), 317317.
  • Lih, A. (2009). The Wikipedia revolution: How a bunch of nobodies created the world's greatest encyclopedia. New York: Hyperion.
  • Lin, N. (2001). Social capital: A theory of structure and action. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lipietz, A. (1992). Towards a new economic order: Postfordism, ecology and democracy. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
  • Loader, B., & Keeble, L. (2004). Challenging the digital divide? A literature review of community informatics initiatives. York, England: Rowntree Foundation.
  • Loader, B. (1998). Cyberspace divide: Equality, agency, and policy in the information society. London: Routledge.
  • Lobao, L.M. (1996). A sociology of the periphery versus a peripheral sociology: Rural sociology and the dimension of space. Rural Sociology, 61(1), 77102.
  • Lofland, L.H. (2003). Community and urban life. In L.T. Reynolds & N.J. Herman-Kinney (Eds.), Handbook of symbolic interactionism (pp. 937974). Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.
  • Logan, J.R., & Molotch, H.L. (1987). Urban fortunes: The political economy of place. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Ludlow, P., & Wallace, M. (2007). The Second Life Herald?: The virtual tabloid that witnessed the dawn of the metaverse. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Luyt, B. (2001). Regulating readers: The social origins of the readers' advisor in the United States. Library Quarterly, 71(4), 443466.
  • Maines, D.R. (1982). In search of mesostructure: Studies in the negotiated order. Urban Life, 11(3), 267279.
  • Marcuse, P. (1997). The enclave, the citadel, and the ghetto. Urban Affairs Review, 33(2), 228264.
  • Marx, K. (1973). Foundations of the critique of political economy. New York: Vintage. (Original work published 1857)
  • Massey, D., & Denton, N. (1993). American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • McDonough, J.P. (1999). Designer selves: Construction of technologically mediated identity within graphical, multiuser virtual environments. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(10), 855869.
  • McKenzie, R.D. (1933). The metropolitan community. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • McKenzie, R.D. (1925/1967). The ecological approach to the study of the community. In R.E. Park, E.W. Burgess, R.D. McKenzie, & L. Wirth (Eds.), The city (pp. 6379). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1925)
  • Mead, G.H. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Mele, C. (1999). Cyberspace and disadvantaged communities. In M. Smith & P. Kollock (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace. London: Routledge.
  • Micklin, M., & Sly, D.F. (1998). The ecological complex: A conceptual elaboration. Continuities in sociological human ecology (pp. 5166). New York: Plenum.
  • Mills, C.W. (1956). The power elite. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Mills, C.W., & Ulmer, M.J. (1946). Small business and civic welfare. Washington, DC: United States Senate, Special Committee to Study Problems of American Small Business.
  • Mitchell, V., & LaGory, M. (2002). Social capital and mental distress in an impoverished community. City & Community, 1(2), 195215.
  • Molotch, H.L. (1976). The city as a growth machine: Toward a political economy of place. American Journal of Sociology, 82(2), 309332.
  • Nardi, B.A., & O'Day, V.L. (1999). Information ecologies: Using technology with heart. London: Cambridge University Press.
  • Nevarez, L. (2008). Efficacy or legitimacy of community power? A reassessment of corporate elites in urban studies Understanding the City (pp. 379396). New York: Blackwell.
  • O'Neil, D. (2002). Assessing community informatics: A review of methodological approaches for evaluating community networks and community technology centers. Internet Research, 12, 76102.
  • Oudshoorn, N., & Pinch, T.J. (2003). How users matter: The co-construction of users and technologies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Park, R.E. (1915). The city: Suggestions for the investigation of human behaviour in the city. American Journal of Sociology, 20, 577612.
  • Park, R.E. (1952). Human communities: The city and human ecology. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
  • Park, R.E. (1967). The natural history of the newspaper. In R.E. Park, E.W. Burgess, R.D. McKenzie & L. Wirth (Eds.), The city (pp. 8098). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1925)
  • Parsons, T. (1965). Structure and process in modern societies. New York: Free Press.
  • Pitkin, B. (2006). Community informatics for community development: The ‘hope or hype’ issue revisited. In P. Purcell (Ed.), Networked neighbourhoods (pp. 7798). London: Springer.
  • Poplin, D.E. (1979). Communities: A survey of theories and methods of research. New York: MacMillan.
  • Popple, K. (1995). Analysing community work: Its theory and practice. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
  • Portes, A. (2000). Globalization from below: The rise of transnational communities. In M.A. Bamyeh (Ed.), The ends of globalization: Bringing society back in (pp. 253270). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone. New York: Simon and Schuster.
  • Qiu, J. (2009). Working-class network society: Communication technology and the information have-less in urban China. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Raber, D., & Budd, J.M. (2003). Information as sign: Semiotics and information science. Journal of Documentation, 59(5), 507522.
  • Reckwitz, A. (2002). Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243263.
  • Rheingold, H. (1993). The virtual community?: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.
  • Ritzer, G. (1975). Sociology: A multiple paradigm science. The American Sociologist, 10(3), 156167.
  • Rogers, E., Collins-Jarvis, L., & Schmitz, J. (1994). The PEN project in Santa Monica: Interactive communication, equality, and political action. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(6), 401410.
  • Sanders, I.T. (1966). The community: An introduction to a social system. New York: Ronald Press.
  • Schnore, L.F. (1958). Social morphology and human ecology. American Journal of Sociology, 63, 620634.
  • Schön, D., Sanyal, B., & Mitchell, W.J. (1999). High technology and low-income communities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Schuler, D. (1996). New community networks: Wired for change. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Selznick, P. (1992). The moral commonwealth: Social theory and the promise of community. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Shibutani, T. (1955). Reference groups as perspectives. In H. Hyman & E. Singer (Eds.), Readings in reference group theory and research (pp. 103114). New York: Free Press.
  • Simmel, G. (2009). Sociology: Inquiries into the construction of social forms. Boston: Brill. (Original work published 1908)
  • Slattery, M. (2003). Symbolic interactionism: G.H. Mead Key ideas in sociology. Cheltenham: Nelson Thornes.
  • Smith, D. (1995). The new urban sociology meets the old: Rereading some classical human ecology. Urban Affairs Review, 30, 432457.
  • Squires, G.D., & Kubrin, C.E. (2005). Privileged places: Race, uneven development and the geography of opportunity in urban America. Urban Studies, 42(1), 4768.
  • Srinivasan, R., & Pyati, A. (2007). Diasporic information environments: Reframing immigrant-focused information research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 58(12), 17341744.
  • Stacey, M. (1969). The myth of community studies. British Journal of Sociology, 20(2), 134147.
  • Star, S.L., & Griesemer, J.R. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Verterbrate Zoology, 1907–1939. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387420.
  • Stevenson, S. (2009). Digital divide: A discursive move away from the real inequities. The Information Society, 25(1), 122.
  • Stevenson, S. (2010). Michel Aglietta and regulation theory. In G.J. Leckie, L.M. Given, & J. Buschman (Eds.), Critical theory for library and information science (pp. 113). Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimited.
  • Stock, W.G. (2011). Informational cities: Analysis and construction of cities in the knowledge society. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 62(5), 963986.
  • Talja, S., Tuominen, K., & Savolainen, R. (2005). “Isms” in information science: Constructivism, collectivism and constructionism. Journal of Documentation, 61(1), 79101.
  • Turner, J.H. (1998). The rise of evolutionary theorizing. The structure of sociological theory (pp. 7986). London: Wadsworth.
  • Turner-Lee, N.E. & Pinkett, R.D. (2004). An asset-based approach to community building and community technology. In P. Day & D. Schuler (Eds.), Community practice in the network society: Local action/global interaction (pp. 170185). London: Routledge.
  • U.S. Department of Commerce. National Telecommunications and Information Administration. (2011). Digital Nation: Expanding Internet usage. NTIA Research Preview. Retrieved from http://www.ntia.doc.gov/report/2011/digital-nation-expanding-internet-usage-ntia-research-preview
  • van Dijk, J.A.G.M. (2005). The deepening divide: Inequality in the information society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Veinot, T.C. (2009a). Interactive acquisition and sharing: Understanding the dynamics of HIV/AIDS information networks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(11), 23132332.
  • Veinot, T.C. (2009b). “A lot of people didn't have a chance to support us because we never told them ⋖”: Stigma management, information poverty and HIV/AIDS information/help networks. Proceedings of the 73rd Annual ASIS&T Annual Meeting, 27, 117.
  • Veinot, T.C. (2010). A multilevel model of HIV/AIDS information/help network development. Journal of Documentation, 66(6), 875905.
  • Veinot, T.C. (2011). Ties are not enough: Regional HIV/AIDS information environments and information acquisition success. Manuscript submitted for publication.
  • Veinot, T.C., Campbell, T.R., Kruger, D., Grodzinksi, A., & Franzen, S. (2011). Drama and danger: The opportunities and challenges of promoting youth sexual health through online social networks. Proceedings of the AMIA 2011 Annual Symposium, 110.
  • Veinot, T.C., Harris, R.M., Bella, L., Rootman, I., & Krajnak, J. (2006). HIV/AIDS information exchange in rural communities: Preliminary findings from a three province study. Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 30(3/4), 271290.
  • Veinot, T.C., Meadowbrooke, C.C., Newman, M.W., Zheng, K., & Perry, E.E. (2010). Routines that ease the pain: The information world of a dialysis clinic. Proceedings of the 72nd Annual ASIS&T Annual Meeting, 26, 14.
  • Vesselinov, E. (2008). Members only: Gated communities and residential segregation in the metropolitan United States. Sociological Forum, 23(3), 536555.
  • Virnoche, M.E. (1998). The seamless web and communications equity: The shaping of a community network. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 23(2), 199220.
  • Vos, V.-J., & Ketelaar, E. (2008). Amsterdam's community memories: Research into how modern media can be applied to archive community memory. In L. Stillman (Ed.), Constructing and sharing memory: Community informatics, identity, and empowerment (pp. 330342). Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  • Warren, R.L. (1971). The community in America. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
  • Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization. Glencoe, IL: Free Press. (Original work published 1920)
  • Weber, M. (1968). Economy and society. New York: Bedminster Press. (Original work published 1925)
  • Wellman, B., Carrington, P.J., & Hall, A. (1997). Networks as personal communities. In B. Wellman & S.D. Berkowitz (Eds.), Social structures: A network approach. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Wellman, B., & Gulia, M. (2000). Virtual communities as communities: Net surfers do not ride alone. In M.A. Smith & P. Kolleck (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 167194). London: Routledge.
  • Wilkinson, K.P. (1991). The community in rural America. New York: Greenwood.
  • Williams, J.P., & Copes, H. (2005). “How edge are you?” Constructing authentic identities and subcultural boundaries in a straightedge Internet forum. Symbolic Interaction, 28(1), 6789.
  • Williams, K. (2007). Community informatics memory as archive: Assembling and using the records of the Technology Opportunities Program (USA), 1994–2005. In G. Graeme Johanson & L. Stillman (Eds.), Constructing and sharing memory: Community informatics, identity and empowerment. Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  • Williams, K. (in press-a). Informatics moments: Digital literacy and social capital in civil society and people's everyday lives. Public Library Quarterly, 29, 193209.
  • Williams, K. (in press-b). Rethinking digital divide research: Datasets and theoretical frameworks. In J. Chen, Q. Zhou, & W. Chen (Eds.), Main issues of information science and information management. Beijing: Peking University Press.
  • Williams, K., & Durrance, J.C. (2008). Social networks and social capital: Rethinking theory in community informatics. Journal of Community Informatics, 4(3).
  • Williams, K., & Durrance, J.C. (2010). Community informatics. In M. Bates & M.M. Maack (Eds.), Encyclopedia of library and information science (3rd ed., pp. 12021208). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
  • Williamson, K. (2005). Ecological theory of human information behaviour. In K.E. Fisher, S. Erdelez, & E.F. McKechnie (Eds.), Theories of information behavior (pp. 128132). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
  • Wilson, T.D. (2006). A re-examination of information seeking behaviour in the context of activity theory. Information Research, 11(4), paper 260.
  • Wirth, L. (1938). Urbanism as a way of life. Amercan Journal of Sociology, 44(1), 124.
  • Worster, D. (1994). Nature's economy: A history of ecological ideas. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Yakubovich, V. (2005). Weak ties, information, and influence: How workers find jobs in a local Russian labor market. American Sociological Review, 70(3), 408421.
  • Young, F., & Lyson, T.A. (1993). Branch plants and poverty in the American South. Sociological Forum, 8(3), 433450.