RESEARCH ARTICLE
Intended and unintended consequences of a publish-or-perish culture: A worldwide survey
Article first published online: 20 APR 2012
DOI: 10.1002/asi.22636
© 2012 ASIS&T
Issue

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
Volume 63, Issue 7, pages 1282–1293, July 2012
Additional Information
How to Cite
van Dalen, H. P. and Henkens, K. (2012), Intended and unintended consequences of a publish-or-perish culture: A worldwide survey. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci., 63: 1282–1293. doi: 10.1002/asi.22636
Publication History
- Issue published online: 14 JUN 2012
- Article first published online: 20 APR 2012
- Manuscript Accepted: 21 DEC 2011
- Manuscript Revised: 20 DEC 2011
- Manuscript Received: 2 NOV 2011
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- bibliometrics;
- scientists;
- surveys
How does publication pressure in modern-day universities affect the intrinsic and extrinsic rewards in science? By using a worldwide survey among demographers in developed and developing countries, the authors show that the large majority perceive the publication pressure as high, but more so in Anglo-Saxon countries and to a lesser extent in Western Europe. However, scholars see both the pros (upward mobility) and cons (excessive publication and uncitedness, neglect of policy issues, etc.) of the so-called publish-or-perish culture. By measuring behavior in terms of reading and publishing, and perceived extrinsic rewards and stated intrinsic rewards of practicing science, it turns out that publication pressure negatively affects the orientation of demographers towards policy and knowledge sharing. There are no signs that the pressure affects reading and publishing outside the core discipline.

1532-2890/asset/olbannerleft.gif?v=1&s=d833098325c9f1060bcbee51adf276c155608167)
1532-2890/asset/olbannercenter.gif?v=1&s=661179918edb4fa732edfd3408eb050a6ce87809)
1532-2890/asset/olbannerright.gif?v=1&s=1ef8a363944134c502cbffa1937878a71b4cc635)