SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Javier Ruiz-Castillo, Ludo Waltman, Field-normalized citation impact indicators using algorithmically constructed classification systems of science, Journal of Informetrics, 2015, 9, 1, 102

    CrossRef

  2. 2
    Rüdiger Mutz, Hans-Dieter Daniel, What is behind the curtain of the Leiden Ranking?, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2015, 66, 6
  3. 3
    J. Manana-Rodriguez, A critical review of SCImago Journal & Country Rank, Research Evaluation, 2014,

    CrossRef

  4. 4
    Vincent Larivière, George A. Lozano, Yves Gingras, Are elite journals declining?, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2014, 65, 4
  5. 5
    Lutz Bornmann, Rüdiger Mutz, From P100 to P100': A new citation-rank approach, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2014, 65, 9
  6. 6
    Michael Schreiber, How to improve the outcome of performance evaluations in terms of percentiles for citation frequencies of my papers, Journal of Informetrics, 2014, 8, 4, 873

    CrossRef

  7. 7
    Michael Schreiber, Is the new citation-rank approach P100′ in bibliometrics really new?, Journal of Informetrics, 2014, 8, 4, 997

    CrossRef

  8. 8
    Lutz Bornmann, Moritz Stefaner, Felix de Moya Anegón, Rüdiger Mutz, Ranking and mapping of universities and research-focused institutions worldwide based on highly-cited papers, Online Information Review, 2014, 38, 1, 43

    CrossRef

  9. 9
    Lutz Bornmann, Moritz Stefaner, Felix de Moya Anegón, Rüdiger Mutz, What is the effect of country-specific characteristics on the research performance of scientific institutions? Using multi-level statistical models to rank and map universities and research-focused institutions worldwide, Journal of Informetrics, 2014, 8, 3, 581

    CrossRef

  10. 10
    Lutz Bornmann, Felix Moya Anegón, What proportion of excellent papers makes an institution one of the best worldwide? Specifying thresholds for the interpretation of the results of the SCImago Institutions Ranking and the Leiden Ranking, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2014, 65, 4
  11. 11
    Ludo Waltman, Nees Jan van Eck, A systematic empirical comparison of different approaches for normalizing citation impact indicators, Journal of Informetrics, 2013, 7, 4, 833

    CrossRef

  12. 12
    Ludo Waltman, Nees Jan van Eck, Paul Wouters, Counting publications and citations: Is more always better?, Journal of Informetrics, 2013, 7, 3, 635

    CrossRef

  13. 13
    Michael Schreiber, Empirical evidence for the relevance of fractional scoring in the calculation of percentile rank scores, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2013, 64, 4
  14. 14
    Michael Schreiber, How much do different ways of calculating percentiles influence the derived performance indicators? A case study, Scientometrics, 2013, 97, 3, 821

    CrossRef

  15. 15
    Lutz Bornmann, Werner Marx, Andreas Barth, The Normalization of Citation Counts Based on Classification Systems, Publications, 2013, 1, 2, 78

    CrossRef

  16. 16
    Michael Schreiber, Uncertainties and ambiguities in percentiles and how to avoid them, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2013, 64, 3
  17. 17
    Lutz Bornmann, Loet Leydesdorff, Jian Wang, Which percentile-based approach should be preferred for calculating normalized citation impact values? An empirical comparison of five approaches including a newly developed citation-rank approach (P100), Journal of Informetrics, 2013, 7, 4, 933

    CrossRef