SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Adamich, T. (2008). RDA (Resource Description and Access): The new way to say, “AACR2.” Knowledge Quest, 36(4), 6469.
  • Adamich, T. (2009). RDA and school libraries: Where are we going and why can't we keep AACR2? Technicalities, 29(6), 1215.
  • Adamich, T. (2010). RDA and libraries: Where are we going? TechKnow, 16(1), 16.
  • Adams, K., Santamauro, B., & Blythe, K. (2008). Successive entry, latest entry, or none of the above? How the MARC21 format, FRBR and the concept of a work could revitalize serials management. Serials Librarian, 54(3–4), 193197.
  • Ascher, J.P. (2008). What's the big deal with RDA? Or, some thoughts on the heliocentric universe. Colorado Libraries, 34(3), 5761.
  • Beacom, M. (2007). Cataloging Cultural Objects (CCO), Resource Description and Access (RDA), and the future of metadata content. Visual Resources Association Bulletin, 34(1), 8185.
  • Bianchini, C., & Guerrini, M. (2009). From bibliographic models to cataloging rules: Remarks on FRBR, ICP, ISBD, and RDA and the relationships between them. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 47(2), 105124.
  • Biella, J.C., & Lerner, H.G. (2011). The RDA test and Hebraica cataloging: Applying RDA in one cataloging community. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 49(7/8), 676695.
  • Bloss, M.E. (2011). Testing RDA at Dominican University's Graduate School of Library and Information Science: The students' perspectives. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 49(7/8), 582599.
  • Buhler, H. (2011). AACR and RDA: One cataloguer's reaction. In E.R. Sanchez (Ed.), Conversations with catalogers in the 21st century (pp. 1319). Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimited.
  • Chan, L.M., & Zeng, M.L. (2006). Metadata interoperability and standardization: A study of methodology. D-Lib Magazine, 12(6). Retrieved from: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/june06/chan/06chan.html
  • Conners, D. (2008). A ghost in the catalog: The gradual obsolescence of the main entry. Serials Librarian, 55(1/2), 8597.
  • Conners, D. (2009). A “mind-boggling” implication: The Hebrew Bible, the Old Testament, and the definition of a work. Judaica Librarianship, 15, 112.
  • Copeland, J.H. (2010). RDA and FRBR: A brave new world in cataloging. Arkansas Libraries, 67(2), 1419.
  • Coyle, K. (2010a). RDA vocabularies for a twenty-first-century data environment. Chicago: ALATechSource.
  • Coyle, K. (2010b). Understanding the Semantic Web: Bibliographic data and metadata. Chicago: ALA TechSource.
  • Coyle, K., & Hillmann, D. (2007). Resource Description and Access (RDA): Cataloging rules for the 20th century. D-Lib Magazine, 13(1/2). Retrieved from: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january07/coyle/01coyle.html
  • Cronin, C. (2011). From testing to implementation: Managing full-scale RDA adoption at the University of Chicago. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 49(7/8), 626646.
  • Curran, M. (2009). Serials in RDA: A starter's tour and kit. Serials Librarian, 57(4), 306323.
  • Curran, M. (2010). Print serials workflow in RDA: A draft workflow for RDA Toolkit based on JSC's sample workflow for a simple book. Serials Librarian, 59(3/4), 244262.
  • Danskin, A. (2010). RDA in the UK: Summary of survey results. Paper presented at CILIP Cataloguing and Indexing Group Conference, Exeter, UK, September 13, 2011. Retrieved from: http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/events/CIG/2010/conf-exeter/presentations/ppt-2000-html/danskin_files/v3_document.html
  • Dunsire, G. (2007). Distinguishing content from carrier: The RDA/ONIX framework for resource categorization. D-Lib Magazine, 13(1/2), 1. Retrieved from: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january07/dunsire/01dunsire.html
  • Dunsire, G., & Willer, M. (2011). Standard library metadata models and structures for the Semantic Web. Library Hi Tech News, 28(3), 112.
  • Duszak, T. (2006). Goodbye AACR2rev, hello RDA: The new cataloguing code. Catholic Library World, 76(3), 198199.
  • Ehlert, M.K. (2010a). RDA: Why new cataloging rules? Technicalities, 30(3), 1920.
  • Ehlert, M.K. (2010b). RDA: Building blocks. Technicalities, 30(4), 1922.
  • Ehlert, M.K. (2010c). RDA. Technicalities, 30(5), 1721.
  • Ehlert, M.K. (2010d). Just like AACR2, except … (part 2). Technicalities, 30(6), 1318.
  • Ehlert, M.K. (2011). Just like AACR2, except … (part 5). Technicalities, 31(1), 1621.
  • Elrod, J.M. (Mac). (2011). Moving cataloguing rules out of the library: Goodbye, AACR2? In E.R. Sanchez (Ed.), Conversations with catalogers in the 21st century (pp. 312). Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimited.
  • El-Sherbini, M., & Curran, M. (2011). Resource Description and Access “RDA”: New code for cataloging. Serials Librarian, 60(1–4), 715.
  • Gorman, M. (2007, December). RDA: Imminent debacle. American Libraries, 6465.
  • Hart, A. (2010a). The RDA primer: A guide for the occasional cataloger. Santa Barbara, CA: Linworth.
  • Hart, A. (2010b). Getting ready for RDA: What you need to know. Library Media Connection, 29(2), 3032.
  • Hider, P. (2009a). A comparison between the RDA taxonomies and end-user categorizations of content and carrier. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 47(6), 544560.
  • Hider, P. (2009b). Library resource categories and their possible groupings. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 40(2), 105115.
  • Hider, P., & Liu, Y.-H. (2011). The actual importance of RDA elements in supporting key user tasks. Paper presented at the Information Online 2011, Sydney, Australia, February 1, 2011. Retrieved from: http://conferences.alia.org.au/online2011/papers/paper_2011_A4.pdf
  • Hillmann, D.I. (2006). RDA for who? Technicalities, 26(3), 810.
  • Hillmann, D.I. (2007a). Great leaps forward. Technicalities, 27(4), 1013.
  • Hillmann, D.I. (2007b). March of the librarians. Technicalities, 27(3), 1012.
  • Hillmann, D.I. (2009). View from a parallel universe. Technicalities, 29(1), 69.
  • Hillmann, D.I., Coyle, K., Phipps, J., & Dunsire, G. (2010). RDA vocabularies: Process, outcome, use. D-Lib Magazine, 16(1/2), 6. Retrieved from: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january10/hillmann/01hillmann.html
  • Hitchens, A., & Symons, E. (2009). Preparing catalogers for RDA training. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 47(8), 691707.
  • Howarth, L.C., & Weihs, J. (2007). Making the Link: AACR to RDA: Part 1: Setting the Stage. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 45(2), 318.
  • Howarth, L.C., & Weihs, J. (2008). Enigma variations: Parsing the riddle of main entry and the “rule of three” from AACR2 to RDA. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 46(2), 201220.
  • IFLA Cataloguing Section and IFLA Meetings of Experts on an International Cataloguing Code. (2009). Statement of international cataloguing principles. The Hague, Netherlands: International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. Retrieved from: http://www.ifla.org/files/cataloguing/icp/icp_2009-en.pdf
  • IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records. (1998). Functional requirements for bibliographic records. The Hague, Netherlands: International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. Retrieved from: http://www.ifla.org/files/cataloguing/frbr/frbr_2008.pdf
  • Intner, S.S. (2006). RDA: Will it be cataloger's judgment or cataloger's judgment day? Technicalities, 26(2), 1, 10–12.
  • Intner, S.S. (2008). RDA: Progress or problem? Technicalities, 28(4), 115.
  • Intner, S.S. (2009). Taking a look at the draft RDA. Technicalities, 29(2), 117.
  • Intner, S.S. (2010). Transitioning. Technicalities, 30(6), 17.
  • Intner, S.S. (2011a). More about the RDA transition. Technicalities, 31(1), 19.
  • Intner, S.S. (2011b). Farewell, cataloging — We hardly knew ye. Technicalities, 31(5), 110.
  • Jones, E., & Carr, P.L. (2006). The shape of things to come: Resource Description and Access (RDA). Serials Librarian, 52(3/4), 281289.
  • Kiorgaard, D. (2010). RDA training needs survey (Australia). Retrieved from: www.nla.gov.au/lis/stndrds/grps/acoc/…/trainingsurveyaust.doc
  • Klossner, M. (2010). RDA for people who really aren't looking forward to RDA. Arkansas Libraries, 67(3), 810.
  • Knowlton, S.A. (2009). How the current draft of RDA addresses the cataloging of reproductions, facsimiles, and microforms. Library Resources & Technical Services, 53(3), 159165.
  • Kraus, D. (2007). Controversies in cataloging. American Libraries, 38(9), 6667.
  • Kuhagen, J.A. (2011). Training for the U.S. RDA test. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 49(7/8), 572581.
  • Library of Congress. (n.d.). Testing Resource Description and Access (RDA). Retrieved from: http://www.loc.gov/bibliographic-future/rda/
  • Library of Congress. (2011). Bibliographic Framework Transition Initiative. Retrieved from: http://www.loc.gov/marc/transition/
  • Library of Congress. (2012a). Library of Congress announces its long-range RDA training plan. Retrieved from: http://www.loc.gov/catdir/cpso/news_rda_implementation_date.html
  • Library of Congress. (2012b). Long-range RDA training plan for 2012 and beyond. Retrieved from: http://www.loc.gov/aba/rda/pdf/RDA_Long-Range_Training_Plan.pdf
  • Library of Congress Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control. (2008). On the record: Report of the Library of Congress Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control. Retrieved from: http://www.loc.gov/bibliographic-future/news/lcwg-ontherecord-jan08-final.pdf
  • Markey, K. (2007). Twenty-five years of end-user searching, part 2: Future research directions. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(8), 11231130.
  • Martell, C. (1981). The war of AACR 2: Victors or victims. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 7(1), 48.
  • McCutcheon, S. (2011). RDA testing in triplicate: Kent State University's experiences with RDA testing. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 49(7/8), 607625.
  • Medeiros, N. (2005). The future of the Anglo-American cataloguing rules. OCLC Systems and Services, 21(4), 261263.
  • Miksa, S.D. (2009). Resource Description and Access (RDA) and new research potentials. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 35(5), 4751.
  • Miller, L. (2011). Resource Description and Access (RDA): An introduction for reference librarians. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 50(3), 216222.
  • Moore, J.R. (2006). RDA: New cataloging rules, coming soon to a library near you! Library Hi Tech News, 23(9), 1217.
  • Nimer, C. (2010). RDA and archives. Journal of Archival Organization, 8(3/4), 227243.
  • Oliver, C. (2010). Introducing RDA: A guide to the basics. Chicago: American Library Association.
  • Park, J. (2006). Semantic interoperability and metadata quality: An analysis of metadata item records of digital image collections. Knowledge Organization, 33(1), 2034.
  • Park, J., & Tosaka, Y. (2010). Metadata creation practices in digital repositories and collections: Schemata, selection criteria, and interoperability. Information Technology & Libraries, 29(3), 104116.
  • Patton, G.E. (Ed.). (2009). Functional requirements for authority data: A conceptual model. Munich, Germany: K.G. Saur.
  • Randall, K.M. (2011). RDA: End of the world postponed? Serials Librarian, 61(3/4), 334345.
  • Sanchez, E.R. (2011). RDA, AACR2, and you: What catalogers are thinking. In E.R. Sanchez (Ed.), Conversations with catalogers in the 21st century (pp. 2070). Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries U.
  • Seikel, M. (2009). No more Romanizing: The attempt to be less Anglocentric in RDA. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 47(8), 741748.
  • Seikel, M., & Steele, T. (2011). How MARC has changed: The history of the format and its forthcoming relationship to RDA. Technical Services Quarterly, 28(3), 322334.
  • Shieh, J. (2011). Participation in the U.S. RDA test program helped transform work habits at George Washington University Libraries. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 49(7/8), 647654.
  • Singer, R. (2008). In search of a really “next generation” catalog. Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship, 20(3), 139142.
  • Tennant, R. (2007, March 15). Will RDA be DOA? Library Journal, 132(4), 25.
  • Tillett, B.B. (2011). Keeping libraries relevant in the Semantic Web with Resource Description and Access (RDA). Serials, 24(3), 266272.
  • Todd, C., Stretton, C., & Stewart, J. (2010). RDA training needs survey (New Zealand). Retrieved from: http://nznuc-cataloguing.pbworks.com/RDA-page
  • TSIG RDA Training Needs Assessment Working Group. (2010). Summary of the survey conducted by TSIG RDA Training Needs Assessment Working Group. Retrieved from: http://rdaincanada.wikispaces.com/Survey
  • U.S. RDA Test Coordinating Committee. (2011). Report and recommendations of the U.S. RDA Test Coordinating Committee. Retrieved from: http://www.loc.gov/bibliographic-future/rda/source/rdatesting-finalreport-20june2011.pdf
  • Wacker, M., Han, M.-J., & Dartt, J. (2011). Testing Resource Description and Access (RDA) with non-MARC metadata standards. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 49(7/8), 655675.
  • Weber, M. (2011). Describing electronic, digital, and other media using AACR2 and RDA: A how-to-do-it manual and CD-ROM for librarians. New York: Neal-Schuman.
  • Weihs, J., & Howarth, L.C. (2008a). Uniform titles from AACR to RDA. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 46(4), 362384.
  • Weihs, J., & Howarth, L.C. (2008b). Designating materials: From “germane terms” to element types. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 45(4), 324.
  • Whittaker, B.M. (2007). DACS and RDA: Insights and questions from the new archival descriptive standard. Library Resources & Technical Services, 51(2), 98105.
  • Yee, M.M. (2011). The single shared catalog revisited. In E.R. Sanchez (Ed.), Conversations with catalogers in the 21st century (pp. 121136). Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimited.
  • Young, J.B., & Bross, V. (2011). Results of the CRCC Informal RDA Testing Task Force. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 49(7/8), 600606.