SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Naohiro Shichijo, Silvia Rita Sedita, Yasunori Baba, How does the entrepreneurial orientation of scientists affect their scientific performance? Evidence from the quadrant model, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 2015, 1

    CrossRef

  2. 2
    Michel Zitt, Meso-level retrieval: IR-bibliometrics interplay and hybrid citation-words methods in scientific fields delineation, Scientometrics, 2015, 102, 3, 2223

    CrossRef

  3. 3
    Sotaro Shibayama, Yasunori Baba, John P. Walsh, Organizational design of University laboratories: Task allocation and lab performance in Japanese bioscience laboratories, Research Policy, 2015, 44, 3, 610

    CrossRef

  4. 4
    Adrián A. Díaz-Faes, María Bordons, Acknowledgments in scientific publications: Presence in Spanish science and text patterns across disciplines, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2014, 65, 9
  5. 5
    Woondong Yeo, Seonho Kim, Jae-Min Lee, Jaewoo Kang, Aggregative and stochastic model of main path identification: a case study on graphene, Scientometrics, 2014, 98, 1, 633

    CrossRef

  6. 6
    Kevin W. Boyack, Michael Patek, Lyle H. Ungar, Patrick Yoon, Richard Klavans, Classification of individual articles from all of science by research level, Journal of Informetrics, 2014, 8, 1, 1

    CrossRef

  7. 7
    Md. Fakruddin, Journal Impact Factor- Applicability and Alternative Indices, Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 2014, 8, 2, 457

    CrossRef

  8. 8
    Hendrik Stork, Jonas J. Astrin, Trends in Biodiversity Research — A Bibliometric Assessment, Open Journal of Ecology, 2014, 04, 07, 354

    CrossRef

  9. You have free access to this content9
    Kevin W. Boyack, Richard Klavans, Aaron A. Sorensen, John P.A. Ioannidis, A list of highly influential biomedical researchers, 1996–2011, European Journal of Clinical Investigation, 2013, 43, 12
  10. 10
    Giancarlo Lauto, Finn Valentin, How Large-Scale Research Facilities Connect to Global Research, Review of Policy Research, 2013, 30, 4
  11. 11
    John Rigby, Looking for the impact of peer review: does count of funding acknowledgements really predict research impact?, Scientometrics, 2013, 94, 1, 57

    CrossRef

  12. 12
    John S. Liu, Louis Y.Y. Lu, An integrated approach for main path analysis: Development of the Hirsch index as an example, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2012, 63, 3
  13. 13
    R. Sullivan, G. Lewison, A.D. Purushotham, An analysis of research activity in major UK cancer centres, European Journal of Cancer, 2011, 47, 4, 536

    CrossRef

  14. 14
    Péter Vinkler, Application of the distribution of citations among publications in scientometric evaluations, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2011, 62, 10
  15. 15
    Michel Zitt, Alain Lelu, Elise Bassecoulard, Hybrid citation-word representations in science mapping: Portolan charts of research fields?, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2011, 62, 1
  16. 16
    Antonio J. Gómez-Núñez, Benjamín Vargas-Quesada, Félix de Moya-Anegón, Wolfgang Glänzel, Improving SCImago Journal & Country Rank (SJR) subject classification through reference analysis, Scientometrics, 2011, 89, 3, 741

    CrossRef

  17. 17
    Maria Theresa Larsen, The implications of academic enterprise for public science: An overview of the empirical evidence, Research Policy, 2011, 40, 1, 6

    CrossRef

  18. 18
    Christian Sternitzke, Knowledge sources, patent protection, and commercialization of pharmaceutical innovations, Research Policy, 2010, 39, 6, 810

    CrossRef

  19. 19
    The Evaluation of Research by Scientometric Indicators, 2010,

    CrossRef

  20. 20
    G. Steven McMillan, Gender differences in patenting activity: An examination of the US biotechnology industry, Scientometrics, 2009, 80, 3, 683

    CrossRef

  21. 21
    Péter Vinkler, Introducing the Current Contribution Index for characterizing the recent, relevant impact of journals, Scientometrics, 2009, 79, 2, 409

    CrossRef

  22. 22
    Daisuke KATAGAMI, Takashi YAMADA, Katsumi NITTA, Support for Comprehension of Invisible Specialty Based on Hierarchical Research Field Network, Journal of Japan Society for Fuzzy Theory and Intelligent Informatics, 2009, 21, 6, 1044

    CrossRef

  23. 23
    Irina Marshakova-Shaikevich, Michael Heinz, Journal ranking of world scientific corpus by Normalized impact factor, Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 2008, 2, 2, 37

    CrossRef

  24. 24
    Jerry Thursby, Marie Thursby, Intellectual Property, Growth and Trade, 2008,

    CrossRef

  25. 25
    G. Steven McMillan, Robert D. Hamilton, The public science base of US biotechnology: A citation-weighted approach, Scientometrics, 2007, 72, 1, 3

    CrossRef

  26. 26
    Grant Lewison, Adriana Roa-Atkinson, Léa Velho, Interactions in knowledge production, Aslib Proceedings, 2005, 57, 3, 200

    CrossRef

  27. 27
    Berenika M. Webster, International presence and impact of the UK biomedical research, 1989-2000, Aslib Proceedings, 2005, 57, 1, 22

    CrossRef

  28. 28
    I. Gómez Caridad, M.T. Fernández Muñoz, M. Bordons Gangas, F. Morillo Ariza, La producción científica española en Medicina en los años 1994–1999, Revista Clínica Española, 2004, 204, 2, 75

    CrossRef

  29. 29
    Schumpeter TAMADA, Fumio KODAMA, Kiminori GEMBA, Measurement of science linkage in the four priority areas (I):, Journal of Information Processing and Management, 2004, 47, 6, 393

    CrossRef

  30. 30
    Grant Lewison, The publication of cancer research papers in high impact journals, Aslib Proceedings, 2003, 55, 5/6, 379

    CrossRef

  31. 31
    G.Steven McMillan, Francis Narin, David L Deeds, An analysis of the critical role of public science in innovation: the case of biotechnology, Research Policy, 2000, 29, 1, 1

    CrossRef

  32. 32
    Per O Seglen, Citation rates and journal impact factors are not suitable for evaluation of research, Acta Orthopaedica, 1998, 69, 3, 224

    CrossRef

  33. 33
    Pedro Álvarez, Antonio Pulgarı́n, Equating research production in different scientific fields, Information Processing & Management, 1998, 34, 4, 465

    CrossRef

  34. 34
    G. Lewison, New bibliometric techniques for the evaluation of medical schools, Scientometrics, 1998, 41, 1-2, 5

    CrossRef

  35. 35
    G. Lewison, G. Dawson, The effect of funding on the outputs of biomedical research, Scientometrics, 1998, 41, 1-2, 17

    CrossRef

  36. 36
    P. O. Seglen, Citations and journal impact factors: questionable indicators of research quality, Allergy, 1997, 52, 11
  37. 37
    Grant Lewison, Graham Dawson, Joe Anderson, Support for UK biomedical research from tobacco industry, The Lancet, 1997, 349, 9054, 778

    CrossRef

  38. 38
    J. S. Perko, Francis Narin, The transfer of public science to patented technology: A case study in agricultural science, The Journal of Technology Transfer, 1997, 22, 3, 65

    CrossRef

  39. 39
    Anne Sigogneau, Between policy categories and research activities: Reviews and journals to describe “environment” networks, Scientometrics, 1996, 37, 2, 337

    CrossRef

  40. 40
    J. Anderson, K. Williams, D. Seemungal, F. Narin, D. Olivastro, Human genetic technology: exploring the links between science and innovation, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 1996, 8, 2, 135

    CrossRef

  41. 41
    Irina Marshakova-Shaikevich, The standard impact factor as an evaluation tool of science fields and scientific journals, Scientometrics, 1996, 35, 2, 283

    CrossRef

  42. 42
    I. Gómez, M.T. Fernández, M.A. Zulueta, J. Camí, Analysis of biomedical research in Spain, Research Policy, 1995, 24, 3, 459

    CrossRef

  43. 43
    Zitatenanalyse mit den Journal Citation Reports des Institute for Scientific Information., BIBLIOTHEK Forschung und Praxis, 1995, 19, 1

    CrossRef

  44. 44
    P. Pichappan, Identification of mainstream journals of science speciality: A method using the discipline-contribution score, Scientometrics, 1993, 27, 2, 179

    CrossRef

  45. 45
    Miranda Lee Pao, On the relationship of funding and research publications, Scientometrics, 1991, 20, 1, 257

    CrossRef

  46. 46
    Terttu Luukkonen, Invited Review Article: Bibliometrics and Evaluation of Research Performance, Annals of Medicine, 1990, 22, 3, 145

    CrossRef

  47. 47
    Terttu Luukkonen, Publication structures and accumulative advantages, Scientometrics, 1990, 19, 3-4, 167

    CrossRef

  48. 48
    Terttu Luukkonen, Publish in a visible journal of perish? assessing citation performance of nordic cancer research, Scientometrics, 1989, 15, 5-6, 349

    CrossRef

  49. 49
    P. Vinkler, An attempt of surveying and classifying bibliometric indicators for scientometric purposes, Scientometrics, 1988, 13, 5-6, 239

    CrossRef

  50. 50
    P. Vinkler, Bibliometric features of some scientific subfields and the scientometric consequences therefrom, Scientometrics, 1988, 14, 5-6, 453

    CrossRef

  51. 51
    E. Noma, Handbook of Quantitative Studies of Science and Technology, 1988,

    CrossRef

  52. 52
    Chunpei He, Miranda Lee Pao, A discipline-specific journal selection algorithm, Information Processing & Management, 1986, 22, 5, 405

    CrossRef

  53. 53
    Vl. Simeon, B. Momčilović, Z. Kralj, B. Grgas, Multivariate statistical analysis of the bibliographic output from a research institution, in relation to the measures of scientific policy, Scientometrics, 1986, 9, 5-6, 223

    CrossRef

  54. 54
    A Yankauer, The American Journal of Public Health, 1911-85., American Journal of Public Health, 1986, 76, 7, 809

    CrossRef

  55. 55
    P. R. McAllister, T. Condon, Econometric analysis of biomedical research publishing patterns, Scientometrics, 1985, 7, 1-2, 55

    CrossRef

  56. 56
    JÅNos Marton, Causes of low and high citation potentials in science: Citation analysis of biochemistry and plant physiology journals, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1983, 34, 4
  57. 57
    Paul R. McAllister, Francis Narin, Characterization of the research papers of U.S. medical schools, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1983, 34, 2
  58. 58
    Thomas R. Kochtanek, Document clustering, using macro retrieval techniques, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1983, 34, 5
  59. 59
    Tibor Braun, Ernö Bujdosó, W. S. Lyon, The Growth of Modern Analytical Chemistry as Reflected in the Statistical Evaluation of its Subject Literature, C R C Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry, 1982, 13, 3, 223

    CrossRef

  60. 60
    Katherine W. McCain, James E. Bobick, Patterns of journal use in a departmental library: A citation analysis, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1981, 32, 4
  61. 61
    S. Miyamoto, K. Nakayama, T. Aoki, Data for Science and Technology, 1981,

    CrossRef

  62. 62
    Gabriel Pinski, Francis Narin, Structure of the psychological literature, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1979, 30, 3
  63. 63
    A. E. Cawkell, Evaluating scientific journals with Journal Citation Reports — a case study in acoustics, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1978, 29, 1
  64. 64
    F. Narin, Objectivity versus relevance in studies of scientific advance, Scientometrics, 1978, 1, 1, 35

    CrossRef

  65. 65
    Nancy L. Geller, On the citation influence methodology of Pinski and Narin, Information Processing & Management, 1978, 14, 2, 93

    CrossRef

  66. 66
    Richard C. Anderson, Francis Narin, Paul McAllister, Publication ratings versus peer ratings of universities, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 1978, 29, 2
  67. 67
    RENATA TAGLIACOZZO, SELF-CITATIONS IN SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE, Journal of Documentation, 1977, 33, 4, 251

    CrossRef