Version of Record online: 15 APR 2011
Copyright © 2011 Royal Meteorological Society
Atmospheric Science Letters
Special Issue: Geoengineering
Volume 12, Issue 2, page 161, April/June 2011
How to Cite
Gadian, A. (2011), Geoengineering. Atmosph. Sci. Lett., 12: 161. doi: 10.1002/asl.344
- Issue online: 15 APR 2011
- Version of Record online: 15 APR 2011
Geoengineering, as a topic in its own right, is a subject still in its infancy. As evidence and grudging acceptability that man-made climate change are becoming reality, ways of addressing this important issue are only now being discussed by the world's scientists.
Over the past 20 years there have been several seminal studies which have attempted to look at the possible methods and impacts of the science behind geoengineering schemes (e.g. Crutzen, 2006; Latham, 1990, to mention but two of many). However, it was the Royal Society Report (2009) which raised scientific interest in and had significant impact on the field of geoengineering. This report suggested there were two major schemes for Solar Radiation Management (SRM) which merited serious research effort as a stop-gap measure, but with Carbon Dioxide Reduction (CDR) techniques being the long term goal. The subsequent book (Launder & Thompson, 2010) provides a set of review articles on this topic.
The five articles in this special issue of Atmospheric Science Letters examine some of the facets of two SRM proposals, Marine Cloud Brightening and Stratospheric Sulphur Injection. Jones et al. (2011) examine some modelling results from these two schemes, Hommel & Graf (2011) and Niemeier et al. (2011) examine specific details of the aerosol for the sulphur scheme; Braesicke et al. (2011) study some of the atmospheric teleconnection consequences and Krawitz et al. (2011) address the important GeoMIP model intercomparison studies.
The overall aim of this special issue is to promote the study of the consequences and science details of these geoengineering schemes, and hence scientific debate.
- 2011. Might dimming the sun change atmospheric ENSO teleconnections as we know them? Atmospheric Science Letters 12: 184–188, DOI: 10.1002/asl.294. , , .
- 2006. Albedo Enhancement by Stratospheric Sulfur injections. Clim Change 77: 211–219. .
- 2011. Modelling the size distribution of geoengineered stratospheric aerosols. Atmospheric Science Letters 12: 168–175, DOI: 10.1002/asl.285. , .
- 2011. A comparison of the climate impacts of geoengineering by stratospheric SO2 injection and by brightening of marine stratocumulus cloud. Atmospheric Science Letters 12: 176–183, DOI: 10.1002/asl.291. , , .
- 2011. The Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP). Atmospheric Science Letters 12: 162–167, DOI: 10.1002/asl.316. , , , , , , .
- 1990. Control of global warming. Nature 347: 372–373. .
- 2010. Geo-engineering climate change. Environmental Necessity or Pandora's Box. C.U.P. ISBN 978-0-521-19803-5. , (eds).
- 2011. The dependency of geoengineered sulfate aerosol on the emission strategy. Atmospheric Science Letters 12: 189–194, DOI: 10.1002/asl.304. , , .
- Royal Society Report. 2009. Geoengineering the climate, ISBN 978-0-85403-773-5.