1521-3994/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=de26f4d4fd0154fbfdfa037914035a3b196547e9 "Astronomische Nachrichten")
This is a rhetorical question – of course it does…
1521-3994/asset/2228_left.gif?v=1&s=c2a19c527494028f0daffd6dc2028d7c5e55de98)
Original Paper
Does your robot need a flamethrower? Automated astronomical instrumentation in Antarctica†
Article first published online: 4 MAR 2008
DOI: 10.1002/asna.200710941
Copyright © 2008 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Additional Information
How to Cite
Tothill, N.F.H., Martin, C.L., Kulesa, C.A. and Briguglio, R. (2008), Does your robot need a flamethrower? Automated astronomical instrumentation in Antarctica. Astron. Nachr., 329: 326–329. doi: 10.1002/asna.200710941
- †
Publication History
- Issue published online: 4 MAR 2008
- Article first published online: 4 MAR 2008
- Manuscript Accepted: 26 NOV 2007
- Manuscript Received: 31 AUG 2007
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- atmospheric effects;
- infrared: general;
- instrumentation: miscellaneous;
- site testing;
- submillimeter
Abstract
The Antarctic Plateau contains sites with the potential to be the best in the world for many astronomical observations. The Plateau has strong advantages in the waveband between thermal-IR and millimetre-waves, for time-based astronomy, and for adaptive optics and interferometry. In such a harsh environment, automation of instrument functions becomes very important. At entirely remote (i.e., uncrewed) locations, automated instruments require robustness above all, especially in their self-contained logistics functions (power and communications). At crewed stations, with human intervention available, automation should concentrate on increasing functionality and decreasing workload on the winterover scientists, enhancing the scientific return on a significant investment. (© 2008 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)