Modeling and Analysis
Performance and cost analysis of future, commercially mature gasification-based electric power generation from switchgrass
Article first published online: 4 MAR 2009
DOI: 10.1002/bbb.138
Copyright © 2009 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
Issue
1932-1031/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=9b629e2a3f9d069b7e4c1283b43bfd8e8b7f0c73)
Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining
Special Issue: The Role of Biomass in America's Energy Future
Volume 3, Issue 2, pages 142–173, March/April 2009
Additional Information
How to Cite
Jin, H., Larson, E. D. and Celik, F. E. (2009), Performance and cost analysis of future, commercially mature gasification-based electric power generation from switchgrass. Biofuels, Bioprod. Bioref., 3: 142–173. doi: 10.1002/bbb.138
Publication History
- Issue published online: 4 MAR 2009
- Article first published online: 4 MAR 2009
- Manuscript Accepted: 22 JAN 2009
- Manuscript Revised: 21 JAN 2009
- Manuscript Received: 23 OCT 2008
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- switchgrass;
- IGCC;
- gasification;
- SOFC;
- Rankine cycle
Abstract
Detailed process designs and mass/energy balances are developed using a consistent modeling framework and input parameter assumptions for biomass-based power generation at large scale (4536 dry metric tonnes per day switchgrass input), assuming future commercially mature component equipment performance levels. The simulated systems include two gasification-based gas turbine combined cycles (B-IGCC) designed around different gasifier technologies, one gasification-based solid oxide fuel cell cycle (B-IGSOFC), and a steam-Rankine cycle. The simulated design-point efficiency of the B-IGSOFC is the highest among all systems (51.8%, LHV basis), with modestly lower efficiencies for the B-IGCC design using a pressurized, oxygen-blown gasifier (49.5% LHV) and for the B-IGCC design using a low-pressure indirectly heated gasifier (48.6%, LHV). The steam-Rankine system has a simulated efficiency of 33.0% (LHV). Detailed capital costs are estimated assuming commercially mature (‘Nth plant’) technologies for the two B-IGCC and the steam-Rankine systems. B-IGCC systems are more capital-intensive than the steam-Rankine system, but discounted cash flow rate of return calculations highlight the total cost advantage of the B-IGCC systems when biomass prices are higher. Uncertainties regarding prospective mature-technology costs for solid oxide fuel cells and hot gas sulfur clean-up technologies assumed for the B-IGSOFC performance analysis make it difficult to evaluate the prospective electricity generating costs for B-IGSOFC relative to B-IGCC. The rough analysis here suggests that B-IGSOFC will not show improved economics relative to B-IGCC at the large scale considered here. © 2009 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

1932-1031/asset/olbannercenter.gif?v=1&s=2dd8ec8150de55f09551f2e1af17533da99eef83)