Original Paper
The comparative bioavailability of an extended-release niacin and lovastatin fixed dose combination tablet versus extended-release niacin tablet, lovastatin tablet and a combination of extended-release niacin tablet and lovastatin tablet
Article first published online: 15 JUN 2007
DOI: 10.1002/bdd.555
Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Additional Information
How to Cite
Menon, R., Tolbert, D. and Cefali, E. (2007), The comparative bioavailability of an extended-release niacin and lovastatin fixed dose combination tablet versus extended-release niacin tablet, lovastatin tablet and a combination of extended-release niacin tablet and lovastatin tablet. Biopharm. Drug Dispos., 28: 297–306. doi: 10.1002/bdd.555
Publication History
- Issue published online: 18 JUN 2007
- Article first published online: 15 JUN 2007
- Manuscript Accepted: 9 FEB 2007
- Manuscript Revised: 8 FEB 2007
- Manuscript Received: 7 DEC 2006
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- niacin;
- lovastatin;
- Advicor;
- pharmacokinetics;
- interaction
Abstract
Lovastatin and extended-release (ER) niacin in a fixed dose combination (Advicor®) is approved for the treatment of dyslipidemia. Since both drugs are extensively metabolized, this study investigated the bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of their co-administration following single-dose administration. In a 4-way crossover study 40 subjects received: two 1000/20 Advicor tablets (ADV), two 1000mg niacin ER tablets (NSP), two 20mg lovastatin tablets (Mevacor®; MEV), and two niacin ER 1000mg tablets with two lovastatin 20mg tablets (NSP+MEV). Plasma was assayed for niacin, nicotinuric acid (NUA), lovastatin, lovastatin acid and HMGCoA reductase inhibition. Urine was assayed for niacin and its metabolites, NUA, N-methylnicotinamide and N-methyl-2pyridone-5-carboxamide. Least square mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals for Cmax and AUC(0−t) were determined for NSP+MEV versus MEV or NSP, ADV versus MEV or NSP, and ADV versus NSP+MEV. Co-administration of niacin and lovastatin did not significantly influence Cmax and AUC(0−t) of lovastatin, niacin, NUA and total urinary recovery of niacin and metabolites. A 22 to 25% decrease in lovastatin acid Cmax was observed while lovastatin acid AUC(0−t) was not affected. The HMGCoA reductase inhibition Cmax and AUC(0−t) were not affected indicating that the difference in lovastatin acid Cmax was not clinically relevant. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

1099-081X/asset/BDD_left.gif?v=1&s=c11e8078e868403f8ca4b2a7b9807faafa9d1c98)
1099-081X/asset/BDD_right.gif?v=1&s=7deb44a49db3df64c5f6356bcbf8e918ac003681)
1099-081X/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=775b0464937511d06451e5bae72dfa31ddb4dca8)