The affect heuristic and the attractiveness of simple gambles
Article first published online: 30 JAN 2007
Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Journal of Behavioral Decision Making
Volume 20, Issue 4, pages 365–380, October 2007
How to Cite
Bateman, I., Dent, S., Peters, E., Slovic, P. and Starmer, C. (2007), The affect heuristic and the attractiveness of simple gambles. J. Behav. Decis. Making, 20: 365–380. doi: 10.1002/bdm.558
- Issue published online: 20 SEP 2007
- Article first published online: 30 JAN 2007
- affect heuristic;
- preference construction;
Prior studies have observed that the attractiveness of playing a simple gamble (7/36 to win $9; otherwise win nothing) is greatly enhanced by introducing a small loss (7/36 win $9; otherwise lose 5¢). The present studies tested and confirmed an explanation of this finding based on the concept of evaluability and the affect heuristic. Evaluators of the “no-loss” gamble lack a precise feeling for how good $9 is, hence give it little weight in their judgment. In the second gamble, comparison with the small loss makes $9 “come alive with feeling” and become weighted in the judgment, thus increasing the attractiveness of the gamble. These results demonstrate the importance of contextual factors in determining affect and preference for simple risk-taking opportunities. They show that the meaning, utility, and weighting of even a very familiar monetary outcome such as $9 is not fixed, but depends greatly on these contextual factors. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.