SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Cited in:

CrossRef

This article has been cited by:

  1. 1
    Hans Hoeken, Ester Šorm, Peter Jan Schellens, Arguing about the likelihood of consequences: Laypeople's criteria to distinguish strong arguments from weak ones, Thinking & Reasoning, 2014, 20, 1, 77

    CrossRef

  2. 2
    Bart de Langhe, Stefano Puntoni, Bang for the Buck: Gain-Loss Ratio as a Driver of Judgment and Choice, Management Science, 2014, 141223041315002

    CrossRef

  3. 3
    Joshua A. Weller, Nathan F. Dieckmann, Martin Tusler, C. K. Mertz, William J. Burns, Ellen Peters, Development and Testing of an Abbreviated Numeracy Scale: A Rasch Analysis Approach, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2013, 26, 2
  4. 4
    Leah C. Georges, Richard L. Wiener, Stacie R. Keller, The Angry Juror: Sentencing Decisions in First-Degree Murder, Applied Cognitive Psychology, 2013, 27, 2
  5. 5
    Thomas Schlösser, David Dunning, Detlef Fetchenhauer, What a Feeling: The Role of Immediate and Anticipated Emotions in Risky Decisions, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2013, 26, 1
  6. 6
    Sudip Bhattacharjee, Kimberly K. Moreno, Tracey Riley, The Interplay of Interpersonal Affect and Source Reliability on Auditors’ Inventory Judgments, Contemporary Accounting Research, 2012, 29, 4
  7. 7
    Andreas Glöckner, Guy Hochman, The Interplay of Experience-Based Affective and Probabilistic Cues in Decision Making, Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie), 2011, 58, 2, 132

    CrossRef

  8. 8
    Caleb Warren, A. Peter McGraw, Leaf Van Boven, Values and preferences: defining preference construction, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 2011, 2, 2
  9. 9
    Paul Slovic, Daniel Västfjäll, Affect, Moral Intuition, and Risk, Psychological Inquiry, 2010, 21, 4, 387

    CrossRef

  10. 10
    Elke U. Weber, On the coefficient of variation as a predictor of risk sensitivity: Behavioral and neural evidence for the relative encoding of outcome variability, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 2010, 54, 4, 395

    CrossRef

  11. 11
    A. Peter McGraw, Eldar Shafir, Alexander Todorov, Valuing Money and Things: Why a $20 Item Can Be Worth More and Less Than $20, Management Science, 2010, 56, 5, 816

    CrossRef

  12. 12
    Ian J. Bateman, Brett H. Day, Andrew P. Jones, Simon Jude, Reducing gain–loss asymmetry: A virtual reality choice experiment valuing land use change, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2009, 58, 1, 106

    CrossRef

  13. 13
    Ellen Peters, Numeracy and the Perception and Communication of Risk, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2008, 1128, 1