SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • Ariely, D., Kamenica, E., & Prelec, D. (2008). Man's search for meaning: The case of Legos. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 67, 671677.
  • Aronson, E., & Mills, J. (1959). The effect of severity of initiation on liking for a group. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 59, 177181.
  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 11731182.
  • Barry, P. (2006, November 29). Glass act! Surrey & Hants Star. Retrieved March 29, 2008, from http://www.shstar.co.uk/
  • Becker, G. S. (1993). Nobel lecture: The economic way of looking at behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 101, 385409.
  • Bem, D. J. (1967). Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. Psychological Review, 74, 183200.
  • Bénabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2003). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Review of Economic Studies, 70, 489520.
    Direct Link:
  • Bénabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2006). Incentives and prosocial behavior. American Economic Review, 96, 16521678.
  • Berns, G. (2005). Satisfaction: The science of finding true fulfillment. New York: Henry Holt.
  • Bentham, J. (1988). The principles of morals and legislation. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books (Originally published, 1781).
  • Birks, B. (2006, October 25). Sedgley firewalk. BBC Black Country. Retrieved March 29, 2008, from http://www.bbc.co.uk/blackcountry/
  • Camerer, C. (2003). Behavioral game theory: Experiments in strategic interaction. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Cormack, M. (Ed.). (2002). Sacrificing the self: Perspectives on martyrdom and religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Cryder, C., & Loewenstein, G. (2010). The critical link between tangibility and generosity. In D. M. Oppenheimer, & C. Y. Olivola (Eds.), The science of giving: Experimental approaches to the study of charity (pp. 237251). New York: Taylor and Francis.
  • Dickert, S., Sagara, N., & Slovic, P. (2010). Affective motivations to help others: A two- stage model of donation decisions. In D. M. Oppenheimer, & C. Y. Olivola (Eds.), The science of giving: Experimental approaches to the study of charity (pp. 161178). New York: Taylor and Francis.
  • Fenster, T. (2011, February 17). Polar plungers freeze for fundraiser. The Stylus. Retrieved February 25, 2011, from http://www.thestylus.net/
  • Fields, R. M. (2004). Martyrdom: The psychology, theology, and politics of self-sacrifice. Westport, CT: Praeger.
  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Firewalkers blaze a trail for charity. (2004, October 21). Haverhill Weekly News. Retrieved March 29, 2008, from http://www.haverhill-news.com
  • Gardiner, R. (2007, July 16). Discovering how lucky we are. Times Online. Retrieved January 11, 2009, from http://www.times.co.nz/
  • Glucklich, A. (2001). Sacred pain: Hurting the body for the sake of the soul. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Gneezy, U., & Rustichini, A. (2000). A fine is a price. The Journal of Legal Studies, 29, 118.
  • Hardy, C. L., & Van Vugt, M. (2006). Nice guys finish first: The competitive altruism hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 14021413.
  • Heath, C. (1999). On the social psychology of agency relationships: Lay theories of motivation overemphasize extrinsic incentives. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 78, 2562.
  • Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., Shachat, K., & Smith, V. (1994). Preferences, property rights, and anonymity in bargaining games. Games and Economic Behavior, 7, 346380.
  • Hsee, C. K., Loewenstein, G, Blount, S., & Bazerman, M. (1999). Preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of options: A theoretical analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 576590.
  • Hull, C. L. (1943). Principals of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Croft.
  • Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002). Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 4981). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kahneman, D., Fredrickson, B. L., Schreiber, C. A., & Redelmeier, D. A. (1993). When more pain is preferred to less: Adding a better end. Psychological Science, 4, 401405.
    Direct Link:
  • Kameda, T., Takezawa, M., Tindale, R. S., & Smith, C. M. (2002). Social sharing and risk reduction: Exploring a computational algorithm for the psychology of windfall gains. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23, 1133.
  • Kaufman, B. E. (1999). Exploring the behavioral foundations of labor economics. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 52, 361392.
  • Kenderdine, A. (2011, February 4). Polar plunge at Lake Anne. The Washington Post. Retrieved February 25, 2011, from http://www.washingtonpost.com/
  • Kohn, A. (1999). Punished by rewards: The trouble with gold stars, incentive plans, A's, praise, and other bribes. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
  • Lane, R. E. (1992). Work as “disutility” and money as “happiness”: Cultural origins of a basic market error. Journal of Socio-Economics, 21, 4364.
  • Ledyard, J. (1995). Public goods: A survey of experimental research. In J. Kagel, & A. Roth (Eds.), Handbook of experimental economics (pp. 111194). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Lewin, S. B. (1996). Economics and psychology: Lessons for our own day from the early twentieth century. Journal of Economic Literature, 34, 12931323.
  • Lewis, M. (1965). Psychological effect of effort. Psychological Bulletin, 64, 183190.
  • Liu, W. (2010). The benefits of asking for time. In D. M. Oppenheimer, & C. Y. Olivola (Eds.), The science of giving: Experimental approaches to the study of charity (pp. 201214). New York: Taylor and Francis.
  • Liu, W., & Aaker, J. (2008). The happiness of giving: The time-ask effect. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 543557.
  • Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2006). New directions in goal-setting theory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 265268.
    Direct Link:
  • Loewenstein, G. (1999). Because it is there: The challenge of mountaineering… for utility theory. Kyklos, 52, 315344.
  • Loewenstein, G., & Issacharoff, S. (1994). Source dependence in the valuation of objects. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 7, 157168.
  • Medin, D. L., & Bazerman, M. H. (1999). Broadening behavioral decision research: Multiple levels of cognitive processing. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 6, 533546.
  • Medin, D. L., Schwartz, H. C., Blok, S. V., & Birnbaum, L. A. (1999). The semantic side of decision-making. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 6, 562569.
  • Olivola, C. Y., & Shafir, E. (2011). Blood, sweat, and cheers: The martyrdom effect extended to others. Unpublished manuscript, University of Warwick.
  • Oppenheimer, D. M., & Olivola, C. Y. (Eds.). (2010). The science of giving: Experimental approaches to the study of charity. New York: Taylor and Francis.
  • Oxford English Dictionary Online. (2008, June). Oxford University Press. Retrieved August 4, 2008, from http://dictionary.oed.com/
  • Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., & Ipeirotis, P. G. (2010). Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 411419.
  • Proctor, R. W., & Reeve, T. G. (Eds.). (1990). Stimulus–response compatibility: An integrated perspective. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
  • Pub-goers walk on fire for charity. (2002, December 6). BBC News. Retrieved March 29, 2008, from http://news.bbc.co.uk
  • Reimers, S. (2009). A paycheck half-empty or half-full? Framing, fairness and progressive taxation. Judgment and Decision-making, 4, 461466.
  • Rozin, P. (1999). Preadaptation and the puzzles and properties of pleasure. In D. Kahneman, E. Diener, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp. 109133). New York: Russell Sage.
  • Russell, A. (2004, October 18). Students hungry to help. The Age. Retrieved January 11, 2009, from http://www.theage.com.au/
  • Shafir, E. (1995). Compatibility in cognition and decision. In J. R. Busemeyer, R. Hastie, & D. L. Medin (Eds.), Decision making from the perspective of cognitive psychology (The psychology of learning and motivation, Vol. 32) (pp. 247274). New York: Academic Press.
  • Slovic, P., Griffin, D., & Tversky, A. (1990). Compatibility effects in judgment and choice. In R. M. Hogarth (Ed.), Insights in decision making: A tribute to Hillel J. Einhorn (pp. 527). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Small, D. A. (2010). Sympathy biases and sympathy appeals: Reducing social distance to boost charitable contributions. In D. M. Oppenheimer, & C. Y. Olivola (Eds.), The science of giving: Experimental approaches to the study of charity (pp. 149160). New York: Taylor and Francis.
  • Smith, M. E. (2003). The Aztecs (Second ed.). Cornwall: Blackwell.
  • Stephens, D. W., & Krebs, J. R. (1986). Foraging theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Symonds, W. C. (2005, September 19). Sweating for dollars. Business Week. Retrieved March 29, 2008, from http://www.businessweek.com
  • Thompson, J. A., & Bunderson, J. S. (2003). Violations of principle: Ideological currency in the psychological contract. Academy of Management Review, 28, 571586.
  • Trope, Y., & Fishbach, A. (2000). Counteractive self-control in overcoming temptation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 493506.
  • von Baeyer, C. L., Piira, T., Chambers, C. T., Trapanotto, M., & Zeltzer, L. K. (2005). Guidelines for the cold pressor task as an experimental pain stimulus for use with children. The Journal of Pain, 6, 218227.
  • Von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1947). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Walster, E., Aronson, E., & Brown, Z. (1966). Choosing to suffer as a consequence of expecting to suffer: An unexpected finding. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 400406.