Presented as a poster at the 21st Annual Meeting of the Society for Pediatric Epidemiologic Research, Chicago, IL, June 23–24, 2008; as a poster at the 41st Annual Meeting of the Society for Epidemiologic Research, Chicago, IL, June 24–27, 2008; and as a poster at the Texas Birth Defects Research Symposium, Lubbock, TX, October 17, 2008.
Article first published online: 30 MAR 2009
Copyright © 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Birth Defects Research Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology
Volume 85, Issue 7, pages 637–646, July 2009
How to Cite
Canfield, M. A., Ramadhani, T. A., Shaw, G. M., Carmichael, S. L., Waller, D. K., Mosley, B. S., Royle, M. H. and Olney, R. S. (2009), Anencephaly and spina bifida among Hispanics: Maternal, sociodemographic, and acculturation factors in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study. Birth Defects Research Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology, 85: 637–646. doi: 10.1002/bdra.20582
The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
- Issue published online: 8 JUL 2009
- Article first published online: 30 MAR 2009
- Manuscript Revised: 10 FEB 2009
- Manuscript Accepted: 10 FEB 2009
- Manuscript Received: 24 SEP 2008
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- Texas Department of State Health Services. Grant Number: U50/CCU613232
- spina bifida;
- neural tube defects;
BACKGROUND: We used data from the multisite National Birth Defects Prevention Study for expected delivery dates from October 1997 through 2003, to determine whether the increased risk in anencephaly and spina bifida (neural tube defects (NTDs)) in Hispanics was explained by selected sociodemographic, acculturation, and other maternal characteristics. METHODS: For each type of defect, we examined the association with selected maternal characteristics stratified by race/ethnicity and the association with Hispanic parents' acculturation level, relative to non-Hispanic whites. We used logistic regression and calculated crude odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Hispanic mothers who reported the highest level of income were 80% less likely to deliver babies with spina bifida. In addition, highly educated Hispanic and white mothers had 76 and 35% lower risk, respectively. Other factors showing differing effects for spina bifida in Hispanics included maternal age, parity, and gestational diabetes. For spina bifida there was no significant elevated risk for U.S.–born Hispanics, relative to whites, but for anencephaly, corresponding ORs ranged from 1.9 to 2.3. The highest risk for spina bifida was observed for recent Hispanic immigrant parents from Mexico or Central America residing in the United States <5 years (OR = 3.28, 95% CI = 1.46–7.37). CONCLUSIONS: Less acculturated Hispanic parents seemed to be at highest risk of NTDs. For anencephaly, U.S.–born and English-speaking Hispanic parents were also at increased risk. Finally, from an etiologic standpoint, spina bifida and anencephaly appeared to be etiologically heterogeneous from these analyses. Birth Defects Research (Part A), 2009. © 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.