SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • 1
    Boden M. 2001. Creativity and knowledge. In CraftA, JeffreyB, LeiblingM, ed; Creativity in Education. London: Continuum Publishing. p. 95102.
  • 2
    Csikszentmihalyi M. 1990. Theories of Creativity. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
  • 3
    McWilliam E, Poronnik P, Taylor PG. 2008. Re-designing science pedagogy: reversing the flight from science. J Sci Educ Technol 17: 22635.
  • 4
    Braben D. 2004. Pioneering Research: A Risk Worth Taking. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
  • 5
    Lunn M, Noble A. 2008. Re-visioning science “love and passion in the scientific imagination”: art and science. Int J Sci Educ 30: 793805.
  • 6
    Culross RR. 2004. Individual and contextual variables among creative scientists: the new work paradigm. Roeper Rev 26: 126.
  • 7
    Bore A. 2006. Bottom-up for creativity in science? a collaborative model for curriculum and professional development. J Educ Teach Int Res Pedag 32: 41322.
  • 8
    Heilbron JL. 1992. Creativity and big science. Phys Today 45: 42.
  • 9
    Kleiman P. 2008. Towards transformation: conceptions of creativity in higher education. Innov Educ Teach Int 45: 20917.
  • 10
    Medina MÁ. 2006. The pursuit of creativity in biology. BioEssays 28: 11512.
  • 11
    Davis RM. 2005. Creativity in science: chance, logic, genius, and zeitgeist. Choice 42: 874.
  • 12
    Gilbert DM. 2007. Creativity: ethics and excellence in science. Choice 45: 118.
  • 13
    Miller AI. 2000. Insights of Genius: Imagery and Creativity in Science and Art. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
  • 14
    Simonton DK. 2003. Scientific creativity as constrained stochastic behavior: the integration of product, person, and process perspectives. Psychol Bull 129: 47594.
  • 15
    Chandler R. 1999. Creative parallel spaces in science and art: knowledge in the information age. J Arts Manage Law Soc 29: 16376.
  • 16
    Simon HA. 2001. Creativity in the arts and the sciences. Kenyon Rev 23: 20320.
  • 17
    Jackson SA. 2004. Ahead of the curve: future shifts in higher education. EDUCAUSE Rev 39: 108.
  • 18
    Kessels U, Rau M, Hannover B. 2006. What goes well with physics? measuring and altering the image of science. Br J Educ Psychol 76: 76180.
  • 19
    Endler LC, Bond TG. 2008. Changing science outcomes: cognitive acceleration in a US setting. Res Sci Educ 38: 14966.
  • 20
    Barrow LH. 2006. A brief history of inquiry: from Dewey to standards. J Sci Teach Educ 17: 26578.
  • 21
    Newton DP, Newton LD. 2009. Some student teachers' conceptions of creativity in school science. Res Sci Technol Educ 27: 45.
  • 22
    Russ RS, Coffey JE, Hammer D, Hutchison P. 2009. Making classroom assessment more accountable to scientific reasoning: A case for attending to mechanistic thinking. Sci Educ 93: 87591.
  • 23
    Popper K. 1959. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Routledge.
  • 24
    Kuhn TS. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • 25
    Barnes TJ. 2004. Placing ideas: genius loci, heterotopia and geography's quantitative revolution. Prog Hum Geogr 28: 58595.
  • 26
    Ramachandran VS. 2006. Creativity versus Skepticism within science. Skeptical Inquirer 30: 48.
  • 27
    Florida R. 2006. The flight of the creative class: the new global competition for talent. Liberal Educ 92: 229.
  • 28
    Park-Rogers MA, Abell SK. 2008. The design, enactment, and experience of inquiry-based instruction in undergraduate science education: a case study. Sci Educ 92: 591607.
  • 29
    Erez R. 2004. Freedom and creativity: an approach to science education for excellent students and its realization in the Israel arts and science academy's curriculum. J Second Gifted Educ 15: 13340.
  • 30
    Kind PM, Kind V. 2007. Creativity in science education: perspectives and challenges for developing school science. Stud Sci Educ 43: 137.
  • 31
    Settlage J. 2007. Demythologizing science teacher education: conquering the false ideal of open inquiry. J Sci Teach Educ 18: 4617.
  • 32
    Reising D. 2008. Nursing education research-how to use it to build your promotion and tenure case. J Nurs Educ 47: 387.
  • 33
    Anonymous. 2010. Postdoc Diary Chem Aust 77: 39.
  • 34
    Kean R, Mitchell N, Wilson D. 2008. Towards intentionality and transparency: analysis and reflection on the process of general education reform. Peer Rev 10: 4.
  • 35
    Loehle C. 1990. A guide to increased creativity in research – inspiration or perspiration? Bioscience 40: 123.
  • 36
    Pugh KJ, Linnenbrink-Garcia L, Koskey KLK, Stewart VC, et al.2010. Motivation, learning, and transformative experience: a study of deep engagement in science. Sci Educ 94: 128.
  • 37
    Treffinger DJ, Isaksen SG. 2005. Creative problem solving: the history, development, and implications for gifted education and talent development. Gifted Child Quart 49: 342.
  • 38
    Sigelman CK. 1999. Life-Span Human Development. 3rd edn. Boston: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
  • 39
    Hamza KM, Wickman P-O. 2009. Beyond explanations: what else do students need to understand science? Sci Educ 93: 102649.
  • 40
    Haigh M. 2007. Can investigative practical work in high school biology foster creativity? Res Sci Ed 37: 12340.
  • 41
    Dewey J. 1916. Chapter 23: Vocational Aspects of Education. Democracy and Education. New York: The Free Press.
  • 42
    Kilpatrick S, Allen K. 2001. Review of Research: Factors Influencing Demand for Vocational Education and Training Courses. Adelaide: Australian National Training Authority. p 68.
  • 43
    Bélanger P. 1999. Adult learning and the transformation of work. In SinghM, ed; Adult Learning and the Future of Work. Hamburg: UNESCO Institute for Education. p 1928.
  • 44
    Skrok K. 2007. Formations of pupils' attitudes and behaviours in chemistry teaching/Formación de valores y actitudes de los estudiantes en educación química. J Sci Educ 8: 107.
  • 45
    Marshall J. 2005. Connecting art, learning, and creativity: a case for curriculum integration. Stud Art Educ 46: 22741.
  • 46
    Otto S. 2007. Beneath and beyond truth: studying literary narratives to research human phenomena. Int J Res Method Educ 30: 7387.
  • 47
    Dahlman Y. 2007. Towards a theory that links experience in the arts with the acquisition of knowledge. Int J Art Des Educ 26: 27484.
  • 48
    Stevenson JC, McKavanagh CW. 1993. Practice 10, Theory 5: an examination of the depth of learning. SET (Research Information for Teachers), No 1, Item 4.
  • 49
    Falk I. 1999. Critical theory and practice in adult education: towards implementation of critical education. Aust N Z J Vocat Educ Res 7: 1329.