Fluorescent proteins for FRET microscopy: Monitoring protein interactions in living cells

Authors

  • Richard N. Day,

    Corresponding author
    1. Department of Cellular and Integrative Physiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
    • Department of Cellular and Integrative Physiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Michael W. Davidson

    1. National High Magnetic Field Laboratory and Department of Biological Science, The Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA
    Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

The discovery and engineering of novel fluorescent proteins (FPs) from diverse organisms is yielding fluorophores with exceptional characteristics for live-cell imaging. In particular, the development of FPs for fluorescence (or Förster) resonance energy transfer (FRET) microscopy is providing important tools for monitoring dynamic protein interactions inside living cells. The increased interest in FRET microscopy has driven the development of many different methods to measure FRET. However, the interpretation of FRET measurements is complicated by several factors including the high fluorescence background, the potential for photoconversion artifacts and the relatively low dynamic range afforded by this technique. Here, we describe the advantages and disadvantages of four methods commonly used in FRET microscopy. We then discuss the selection of FPs for the different FRET methods, identifying the most useful FP candidates for FRET microscopy. The recent success in expanding the FP color palette offers the opportunity to explore new FRET pairs.

Ancillary