SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

References

  • Bayrock DP, Ingledew WM. 2001. Application of multistage continuous fermentation for production of fuel alcohol by very-high-gravity fermentation technology. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 27: 8793.
  • Cao Y, Tan HM. 2004. The effect of shear field on the hydrolysis of cellulose. J Macromol Sci Phys B43: 11151121.
  • Devantier R, Pedersen S, Olsson L. 2005. Characterization of very high gravity ethanol fermentation of corn mash. Effect of glucoamylase dosage, pre-saccharification and yeast strain. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 68: 622629.
  • Fan ZL, South C, Lyford K, Munsie J, van Walsum P, Lynd LR. 2003. Conversion of paper sludge to ethanol in a semicontinuous solids-fed reactor. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 26: 93101.
  • Gruno M, Valjamae P, Pettersson G, Johansson G. 2004. Inhibition of the Trichoderma reesei cellulases by cellobiose is strongly dependent on the nature of the substrate. Biotechnol Bioeng 86: 503511.
  • Gusakov AV, Sinitsyn AP, Davydkin IY, Davydkin VY, Protas OV. 1996. Enhancement of enzymatic cellulose hydrolysis using a novel type of bioreactor with intensive stirring induced by electromagnetic field. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 56: 141153.
  • Ingesson H, Zacchi G, Yang B, Esteghlalian AR, Saddler JN. 2001. The effect of shaking regime on the rate and extent of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. J Biotechnol 88: 177182.
  • Jones AM, Ingledew WM. 1994. Fuel alcohol production—Appraisal of nitrogenous yeast foods for very high gravity wheat mash fermentation. Proc Biochem 29: 483488.
  • Katzen R, Madson PW, Moon GD. 1999. Alcohol destillation—The fundamentals. In: JacquesKA, LyonsTP, KelsallDR, editors. The alcohol textbook. Nottingham: Nottingham University Press. pp 103125.
  • Klinke HB, Thomsen AB, Ahring BK. 2004. Inhibition of ethanol-producing yeast and bacteria by degradation products produced during pre-treatment of biomass. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 66: 1026.
  • Lu Y, Yang B, Gregg D, Saddler JN, Mansfield SD. 2002. Cellulase adsorption and an evaluation of enzyme recycle during hydrolysis of steam-exploded softwood residues. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 98–100: 641654.
  • Mais U, Esteghlalian AR, Saddler JN. 2002a. Influence of mixing regime on enzymatic saccharification of steam-exploded softwood chips. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 98–100: 463472.
  • Mais U, Esteghlalian AR, Saddler JN, Mansfield SD. 2002b. Enhancing the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulosic materials using simultaneous ball milling. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 98: 815832.
  • Mohagheghi A, Tucker M, Grohmann K, Wyman C. 1992. High solids simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of pretreated wheat straw to ethanol. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 33: 6781.
  • Palmqvist E, Grage H, Meinander NQ, Hahn-Hagerdal B. 1999. Main and interaction effects of acetic acid, furfural, and p-hydroxybenzoic acid on growth and ethanol productivity of yeasts. Biotechnol Bioeng 63: 4655.
  • Rudolf A, Alkasrawi M, Zacchi G, Liden G. 2005. A comparison between batch and fed-batch simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of steam pretreated spruce. Enzyme Microb Technol 37: 195204.
  • Sluiter A. 2004. Determination of structural carbohydrates and lignin in biomass. Golden, CO, USA: National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
  • Tengborg C, Galbe M, Zacchi G. 2001. Influence of enzyme loading and physical parameters on the enzymatic hydrolysis of steam-pretreated softwood. Biotechnol Prog 17: 110117.
  • Thomsen MH, Thygesen A, Jørgensen H, Larsen J, Christensen BH, Thomsen AB. 2006. Preliminary results on optimisation of pilot scale pretreatment of wheat straw used in coproduction of bioethanol and electricity. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 129–132: 448460.
  • Tolan JS. 2002. Iogen's process for producing ethanol from cellulosic biomass. Clean Techn Environ Policy 3: 339345.
  • Varga E, Klinke HB, Reczey K, Thomsen AB. 2004. High solid simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of wet oxidized corn stover to ethanol. Biotechnol Bioeng 88: 567574.
  • Wingren A, Galbe M, Zacchi G. 2003. Techno-economic evaluation of producing ethanol from softwood: Comparison of SSF and SHF and identification of bottlenecks. Biotechnol Prog 19: 11091117.
  • Wood TM, Bhat KM. 1988. Methods for measuring cellulase activities. In: WoodWA, KelloggST, editors. Biomass—Part A: Cellulose and hemicellulose. San Diego: Academic Press. pp 87112.
  • Wu Z, Lee YY. 1997. Inhibition of the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose by ethanol. Biotechnol Lett 19: 977979.
  • Xiao ZZ, Zhang X, Gregg DJ, Saddler JN. 2004. Effects of sugar inhibition on cellulases and beta-glucosidase during enzymatic hydrolysis of softwood substrates. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 113–16: 11151126.