Article

You have free access to this content

An optimized microplate assay system for quantitative evaluation of plant cell wall–degrading enzyme activity of fungal culture extracts†

  1. Brian C. King1,
  2. Marie K. Donnelly2,
  3. Gary C. Bergstrom1,
  4. Larry P. Walker2,
  5. Donna M. Gibson1,3,*

Article first published online: 29 SEP 2008

DOI: 10.1002/bit.22151

Issue

Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Volume 102, Issue 4, pages 1033–1044, 1 March 2009

Additional Information

How to Cite

King, B. C., Donnelly, M. K., Bergstrom, G. C., Walker, L. P. and Gibson, D. M. (2009), An optimized microplate assay system for quantitative evaluation of plant cell wall–degrading enzyme activity of fungal culture extracts. Biotechnol. Bioeng., 102: 1033–1044. doi: 10.1002/bit.22151

Author Information

  1. 1

    Department of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853; telephone: 607-255-2359; fax: 607-255-2739

  2. 2

    Department of Biological and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853

  3. 3

    USDA Agricultural Research Service, Robert W. Holley Center for Agriculture and Health, Ithaca, New York 14853

*Department of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853; telephone: 607-255-2359; fax: 607-255-2739.

  1. †

    Brian C. King and Marie K. Donnelly contributed equally to this work.

Publication History

  1. Issue published online: 20 JAN 2009
  2. Article first published online: 29 SEP 2008
  3. Accepted manuscript online: 29 SEP 2008 12:00AM EST
  4. Manuscript Accepted: 22 SEP 2008
  5. Manuscript Revised: 25 AUG 2008
  6. Manuscript Received: 30 JUN 2008

Funded by

  • Cornell University
  • Department of Plant Pathology and Plant-Microbe Biology
  • USDA-ARS
  • New York State Foundation for Science, Technology and Innovation (NYSTAR)

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

ARTICLE TOOLS

Get PDF (346K)

References

  • Ai Y-C, Wilson DB. 2002. Mutation and expression of N233C-D506C of cellulase Cel6B from Thermobifida fusca in Escherichia coli. Enzyme Microb Technol 30(6): 804–808.
  • Annis SL, Goodwin PH. 1997. Recent advances in the molecular genetics of plant cell wall-degrading enzymes produced by plant pathogenic fungi. Eur J Plant Pathol 103: 1–14.
  • Aro N, Pakula T, Penttila M. 2005. Transcriptional regulation of plant cell wall degradation by filamentous fungi. FEMS Microbiol Rev 29: 719–739.
    Direct Link:
  • Berlin A, Gilkes N, Kilburn D, Bura R, Markov A, Skomarovsky A, Okunev O, Gusakov A, Maximenko V, Gregg D, Sinitsyn A, Saddler J. 2005. Evaluation of novel fungal cellulase preparations for ability to hydrolyze softwood substrates- evidence for the role of accessory enzymes. Enzyme Microb Technol 37(2): 175–184.
  • Berlin A, Maximenko V, Gilkes N, Saddler J. 2007. Optimization of enzyme complexes for lignocellulose hydrolysis. Biotechnol Bioeng 97(1): 287–296.
    Direct Link:
  • Breuil C, Saddler JN. 1985. Comparison of the 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid and Nelson-Somogyi methods of assaying for reducing sugars and determining cellulase activity. Enzyme Microb Technol 7: 327–332.
  • Brunner K, Lichtenauer A, Kratochwill K, Delic M, Mach R. 2007. Xyr1 regulates xylanase but not cellulase formation in the head blight fungus Fusarium graminearum. Curr Genet 52(5): 213–220.
  • Calero-Nieto F, Di Petro A, Roncero MIG, Hera C. 2007. Role of the transcriptional activator XlnR of Fusarium oxysporum in regulation of xylanase genes and virulence. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 20(8): 977–985.
  • Calero-Nieto F, Hera C, Di Pietro A, Orejas M, Roncero MIG. 2008. Regulatory elements mediating expression of xylanase genes in Fusarium oxysporum. Fungal Genet Biol 45(1): 28–34.
  • Chen M, Zhao J, Xia L. 2008. Enzymatic hydrolysis of maize straw polysaccharides for the production of reducing sugars. Carbohydr Polym 71(3): 411–415.
  • Cherry JR, Fidantsef AL. 2003. Directed evolution of industrial enzymes: An update. Curr Opin Biotechnol 14: 438–443.
  • Chundawat SPS, Balan V, Dale BE. 2008. High-throughput microplate technique for enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass. Biotechnol Bioeng 99(6): 1281–1294.
    Direct Link:
  • Coughlan M. 1985. The properties of fungal and bacterial cellulases with comment on their production and application. Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev 3: 39–109.
  • Coward-Kelly G, Aiello-Mazzari C, Kim S, Granda C, Holtzapple M. 2003. Suggested improvements to the standard filter paper assay used to measure cellulase activity. Biotechnol Bioeng 82(6): 745–749.
    Direct Link:
  • Cuomo CA, Guldener U, Xu J-R, Trail F, Turgeon BG, Di Pietro A, Walton JD, Ma L-J, Baker SE, Rep M, et al. 2007. The Fusarium graminearum genome reveals a link between localized polymorphism and pathogen specialization. Science 317: 1400–1402.
  • Decker SR, Adney WS, Jennings E, Vinzant TB, Himmel ME. 2003. Automated filter paper assay for determination of cellulase activity. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 105: 689–703.
  • Duff SJB, Murray WD. 1996. Bioconversion of forest products industry waste cellulosics to fuel ethanol: A review. Bioresour Technol 55(1): 1–33.
  • Duff SJB, Cooper DG, Fuller OM. 1987. Effect of media composition and growth conditions on production of cellulase and beta-glucosidase by a mixed fungal fermentation. Enzyme Microb Technol 9(1): 47–52.
  • Esquerre-Tugaye M-T, Boudart G, Dumas B. 2000. Cell wall degrading enzymes, inhibitory proteins, and oligosaccharides participate in the molecular dialogue between plants and pathogens. Plant Physiol Biochem 38: 157–163.
  • Fullbrook PD. 1996. Practical limits and prospects (kinetics). In: GodfreyT, WestS, editors. Industrial enzymology. New York: Stockton Press. 609 p.
  • Ghose TK. 1987. Measurement of cellulase activities. Pure Appl Chem 59(2): 257–268.
  • Ghosh VK, Ghose TK, Gopalkrishnan KS. 1982. Improvement of T. Reesei strain through mutation and selected screening techniques. Biotechnol Bioeng 24(1): 241–243.
    Direct Link:
  • Gray KA, Zhao L, Emptage M. 2006. Bioethanol. Curr Opin Chem Biol 10(2): 141–146.
  • Gusakov AV, Sinitsyn AP, Salanovich TN, Bukhtojarov FE, Markov AV, Ustinov BB, Zeijl Cv, Punt P, Burlingame R. 2005. Purification, cloning and characterisation of two forms of thermostable and highly active cellobiohydrolase I (Cel7A) produced by the industrial strain of Chrysosporium lucknowense. Enzyme Microb Technol 36(1): 57–69.
  • Hegedus DD, Rimmer SR. 2005. Sclerotinia sclerotiorum: When “to be or not to be” a pathogen? FEMS Microbiol Lett 251(2): 177–184.
    Direct Link:
  • Hu R, Lin L, Liu T, Ouyang P, He B, Liu S. 2008. Reducing sugar content in hemicellulose hydrolysate by DNS method: A revisit. J Biobased Mater Bioenergy 2: 156–161.
  • Irwin DC, Spezio M, Walker LP, Wilson DB. 1993. Activity studies of eight purified cellulases: Specificity, synergism, and binding domain effects. Biotechnol Bioeng 42(8): 1002–1013.
    Direct Link:
  • Irwin D, Shin D-H, Zhang S, Barr BK, Sakon J, Karplus PA, Wilson DB. 1998. Roles of the catalytic domain and two cellulose binding domains of Thermomonospora fusca E4 in cellulose hydrolysis. J Bacteriol 180(7): 1709–1714.
  • Jeoh T, Wilson DB, Walker LP. 2002. Cooperative and competitive binding in synergistic mixtures of Thermobifida fusca Cel5A, Cel6B and Cel9A. Biotechnol Prog 18(4): 760–769.
    Direct Link:
  • Jørgensen H, Kristensen JB, Felby C. 2007. Enzymatic conversion of lignocellulose into fermentable sugars: Challenges and opportunities. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefin 1(2): 119–134.
    Direct Link:
  • Kabel MA, van der Maarel MJEC, Klip G, Voragen AGJ, Schols HA. 2006. Standard assays do not predict the efficiency of commercial cellulase preparations towards plant materials. Biotechnol Bioeng 93(1): 56–63.
    Direct Link:
  • Lin Y, Tanaka S. 2006. Ethanol fermentation from biomass resources: Current state and prospects. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 69: 627–642.
  • Martinez D, Berka RM, Henrissat B, Saloheimo M, Arvas M, Baker SE, Chapman J, Chertkov O, Coutinho PM, Cullen D, et al. 2008. Genome sequencing and analysis of the biomass-degrading fungus Trichoderma reesei (syn. Hypocrea jecorina). Nat Biotechnol 26(5): 553–560.
  • Mendgen K, Hahn M, Deising H. 1996. Morphogenesis and mechanisms of penetration by plant pathogenic fungi. Annu Rev Phytopathol 34: 367–386.
  • Merino ST, Cherry J. 2007. Progress and challenges in enzyme development for biomass utilization. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 108: 95–120.
  • Miller GL. 1959. Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal Chem 31(3): 426–428.
  • Morrall RAA, Dueck J. 1982. Epidemiology of Sclerotinia stem rot of rapeseed in Saskatchewan. Can J Plant Pathol 4(2): 161–168.
  • Olfa E, Mondher M, Issam S, Ferid L, Nejib MM. 2007. Induction, properties and application of xylanase activity from Sclerotinia sclerotiorum S2 fungus. J Food Biochem 31: 96–107.
    Direct Link:
  • Paper JM, Scott-Craig JS, Adhikari ND, Cuomo CA, Walton JD. 2007. Comparative proteomics of extracellular proteins in vitro and in planta from the pathogenic fungus Fusarium graminearum. Proteomics 7: 3171–3183.
    Direct Link:
  • Paul PA, Lipps PE, De Wolf E, Shaner G, Buechley G, Adhikari T, Ali S, Stein J, Osborne L, Madden LV. 2007. A distributed lag analysis of the relationship between Gibberella zeae inoculum density on wheat spikes and weather variables. Phytopathology 97(12): 1608–1624.
  • Phalip V, Delalande F, Carapito C, Goubet F, Hatsch D, Leize-Wagner E, Dupree P, Dorsselaer A, Jeltsch J-M. 2005. Diversity of the exoproteome of Fusarium graminearum grown on plant cell wall. Curr Genet 48: 366–379.
  • Rauscher R, Wurleitner E, Wacenovsky C, Aro N, Stricker AR, Zeilinger S, Kubicek CP, Penttila M, Mach RL. 2006. Transcriptional regulation of xyn1, encoding xylanase I, in Hypocrea jecorina. Eukaryotic Cell 5(3): 447–456.
  • Rivers D, Gracheck S, Woodford L, Emert G. 1984. Limitations of the DNS assay for reducing sugars from saccharified lignocellulosics. Biotechnol Bioeng 26(7): 800–802.
    Direct Link:
  • Roman H, Madikane M, Pletschke BI, Rose PD. 2008. The degradation of lignocellulose in a chemically and biologically generated sulphidic environment. Bioresour Technol 99(7): 2333–2339.
  • RoseJKC, editor. 2003. The plant cell wall. CRC Press.
  • Rosgaard L, Pedersen S, Cherry JR, Harris P, Meyer AS. 2006. Efficiency of new fungal cellulase systems in boosting enzymatic degradation of barley straw lignocellulose. Biotechnol Prog 22(2): 493–498.
    Direct Link:
  • Saddler JN, Gregg DJ. 1998. Ethanol production from forest wastes. In: BruceA, PalfreymanJW, editors. Forest products biotechnology. London; Bristol, PA: Taylor & Francis. 326 p.
  • Schmer MR, Vogel KP, Mitchell RB, Perrin RK. 2008. Net energy of cellulosic ethanol from switchgrass. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(2): 464–469.
  • Schwald W, Chan M, Breuil C, Saddler JN. 1988. Comparison of HPLC and colorimetric methods for measuring cellulolytic activity. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 28(4): 398–403.
  • Selig MJ, Knoshaug EP, Adney WS, Himmel ME, Decker SR. 2008. Synergistic enhancement of cellobiohydrolase performance on pretreated corn stover by addition of xylanase and esterase activities. Bioresour Technol 99(11): 4997–5005.
  • Sheir-Neiss G, Montenecourt BS. 1984. Characterization of the secreted cellulases of Trichoderma reesei wild type and mutants during controlled fermentations. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 20(1): 46–53.
  • Stricker AR, Grosstessner-Hain K, Wurleitner E, Mach RL. 2006. Xyr1 (Xylanase Regulator 1) regulates both the hydrolytic enzyme system and D-xylose metabolism in Hypocrea jecorina. Eukaryotic Cell 5(12): 2128–2137.
  • Sutton JC. 1982. Epidemiology of wheat head blight and maize ear rot caused by Fusarium graminearum. Can J Plant Pathol 4: 195.
  • Szczodrak J, Fiedurek J. 1996. Technology for conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to ethanol. Biomass Bioenergy 10(5–6): 367–375.
  • Tengborg C, Galbe M, Zacchi G. 2001. Influence of enzyme loading and physical parameters on the enzymatic hydrolysis of steam-pretreated softwood. Biotechnol Prog 17(1): 110–117.
    Direct Link:
  • Tomme P, Warren RA, Gilkes NR. 1995. Cellulose hydrolysis by bacteria and fungi. Adv Microb Physiol 37: 2–81.
  • Tonukari NJ. 2003. Enzymes and fungal virulence. J Appl Sci Environ Manage 7(1): 5–8.
  • Toth IK, Birch PRJ. 2005. Rotting softly and stealthily. Curr Opin Plant Biol 8: 424–429.
  • USDOE. 2004. Biomass Program: Multi-Year Technical Plan. Office of Science and Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy USDOE.
  • USDOE. 2005. DOE Genomics: GTL Roadmap: Systems Biology for Energy and Environment. Office of Science and Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy USDOE.
  • USDOE. June 2006. Biofuels Joint Roadmap. Breaking the Biological Barriers to Cellulosic Ethanol: A Joint Research Agenda. Office of Science and Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy USDOE.
  • Voutilainen SP, Boer H, Linder MB, Puranen T, Rouvinen J, Vehmaanperä J, Koivula A. 2007. Heterologous expression of Melanocarpus albomyces cellobiohydrolase Cel7B, and random mutagenesis to improve its thermostability. Enzyme Microb Technol 41(3): 234–243.
  • Walton JD. 1994. Deconstructing the plant cell wall. Plant Physiol 104: 1113–1118.
  • Warren RA. 1996. Microbial hydrolysis of polysaccharides. Annu Rev Microbiol 50: 183–212.
  • Wen Z, Liao W, Chen S. 2004. Hydrolysis of animal manure lignocellulosics for reducing sugar production. Bioresour Technol 91(1): 31–39.
  • Wilson DB. 2008. Three microbial strategies for plant cell wall degradation. Ann NY Acad Sci 1125(1): 289–297.
    Direct Link:
  • Wilson DB, Irwin DC. 1999. Genetics and properties of cellulases. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol: Recent Prog Bioconversion 65: 1S–21S.
  • Wood TM, Bhat KM. 1988. Methods for measuring cellulase activities. methods in Enzymology. Academic Press. p 87–112.
  • Xiao Z, Storms R, Tsang A. 2004. Microplate-based filter paper assay to measure total cellulase activity. Biotechnol Bioeng 88(7): 832–837.
    Direct Link:
  • Xiao Z, Storms R, Tsang A. 2005. Microplate-based carboxymethylcellulose assay for endoglucanase activity. Anal Biochem 342(1): 176–178.
  • Yajima W, Kav NNV. 2006. The proteome of the phytopathogenic fungus Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. Proteomics 6(22): 5995–6007.
    Direct Link:
  • Zhang YHP, Himmel ME, Mielenz JR. 2006. Outlook for cellulase improvement: Screening and selection strategies. Biotechnol Adv 24(5): 452–481.
Get PDF (346K)