Article
Increasing cellulose accessibility is more important than removing lignin: A comparison of cellulose solvent-based lignocellulose fractionation and soaking in aqueous ammonia
Article first published online: 30 SEP 2010
DOI: 10.1002/bit.22919
Copyright © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Additional Information
How to Cite
Rollin, J. A., Zhu, Z., Sathitsuksanoh, N. and Zhang, Y.-H. P. (2011), Increasing cellulose accessibility is more important than removing lignin: A comparison of cellulose solvent-based lignocellulose fractionation and soaking in aqueous ammonia. Biotechnol. Bioeng., 108: 22–30. doi: 10.1002/bit.22919
Publication History
- Issue published online: 21 NOV 2010
- Article first published online: 30 SEP 2010
- Accepted manuscript online: 1 SEP 2010 12:00AM EST
- Manuscript Accepted: 17 AUG 2010
- Manuscript Revised: 11 AUG 2010
- Manuscript Received: 18 MAY 2010
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- biofuels;
- biomass pretreatment;
- cellulose solvent- and organic solvent-based lignocellulose fractionation (COSLIF);
- cellulose accessibility to cellulase;
- lignin removal;
- soaking in aqueous ammonia (SAA)
Abstract
While many pretreatments attempt to improve the enzymatic digestibility of biomass by removing lignin, this study shows that improving the surface area accessible to cellulase is a more important factor for achieving a high sugar yield. Here we compared the pretreatment of switchgrass by two methods, cellulose solvent- and organic solvent-based lignocellulose fractionation (COSLIF) and soaking in aqueous ammonia (SAA). Following pretreatment, enzymatic hydrolysis was conducted at two cellulase loadings, 15 filter paper units (FPU)/g glucan and 3 FPU/g glucan, with and without BSA blocking of lignin absorption sites. The hydrolysis results showed that the lignin remaining after SAA had a significant negative effect on cellulase performance, despite the high level of delignification achieved with this pretreatment. No negative effect due to lignin was detected for COSLIF-treated substrate. SEM micrographs, XRD crystallinity measurements, and cellulose accessibility to cellulase (CAC) determinations confirmed that COSLIF fully disrupted the cell wall structure, resulting in a 16-fold increase in CAC, while SAA caused a 1.4-fold CAC increase. A surface plot relating the lignin removal, CAC, and digestibility of numerous samples (both pure cellulosic substrates and lignocellulosic materials pretreated by several methods) was also developed to better understand the relative impacts of delignification and CAC on glucan digestibility. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2011; 108:22–30. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

1097-0290/asset/BIT_left.gif?v=1&s=5f6054ce9ff7b0421e44e8e4e33966356f37b71c)
