Degradation of reactive dyes in a photocatalytic circulating-bed biofilm reactor

Authors

  • Guozheng Li,

    Corresponding author
    1. Swette Center for Environmental Biotechnology, Biodesign Institute at Arizona State University, 1001 South McAllister Avenue, Tempe, Arizona 85287-5701; telephone: 1-480-727-7596; fax: 1-480-727-0889
    • Swette Center for Environmental Biotechnology, Biodesign Institute at Arizona State University, 1001 South McAllister Avenue, Tempe, Arizona 85287-5701; telephone: 1-480-727-7596; fax: 1-480-727-0889.
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Seongjun Park,

    1. Swette Center for Environmental Biotechnology, Biodesign Institute at Arizona State University, 1001 South McAllister Avenue, Tempe, Arizona 85287-5701; telephone: 1-480-727-7596; fax: 1-480-727-0889
    2. Construction Technology Center, Samsung Construction and Trading, Seoul, Republic of Korea
    Search for more papers by this author
  • Bruce E. Rittmann

    1. Swette Center for Environmental Biotechnology, Biodesign Institute at Arizona State University, 1001 South McAllister Avenue, Tempe, Arizona 85287-5701; telephone: 1-480-727-7596; fax: 1-480-727-0889
    Search for more papers by this author

  • Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online version of this article.

Abstract

Decolorization and mineralization of reactive dyes by intimately coupled TiO2-photocatalysis and biodegradation (ICPB) on a novel TiO2-coated biofilm carrier were investigated in a photocatalytic circulating-bed biofilm reactor (PCBBR). Two typical reactive dyes—Reactive Black 5 (RB5) and Reactive Yellow 86 (RY86)—showed similar first-order kinetics when being photocatalytically decolorized at low pH (∼4–5) in batch experiments. Photocatalytic decolorization was inhibited at neutral pH in the presence of phosphate or carbonate buffer, presumably due to electrostatic repulsion from negatively charged surface sites on TiO2, radical scavenging by phosphate or carbonate, or both. Therefore, continuous PCBBR experiments were carried out at a low pH (∼4.5) to maintain high photocatalytic efficiency. In the PCBBR, photocatalysis alone with TiO2-coated carriers could remove target compound RB5 and COD by 97% and 47%, respectively. Addition of biofilm inside macroporous carriers maintained a similar RB5 removal efficiency, but COD removal increased to 65%, which is evidence of ICPB despite the low pH. ICPB was further proven by finding microorganisms inside carriers at the end of the PCBBR experiments. A proposed ICPB pathway for RB5 suggests that a major intermediate, a naphthol derivative, was responsible for most of the residual COD, while most of the nitrogen in the azo-bonds ([BOND]N[DOUBLE BOND]N[BOND]) was oxidized to N2. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2012; 109:884–893. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Ancillary