Article
Optical sensor enabled rocking T-flasks as novel upstream bioprocessing tools
Article first published online: 11 APR 2012
DOI: 10.1002/bit.24508
Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Additional Information
How to Cite
Vallejos, J. R., Micheletti, M., Brorson, K. A., Moreira, A. R. and Rao, G. (2012), Optical sensor enabled rocking T-flasks as novel upstream bioprocessing tools. Biotechnol. Bioeng., 109: 2295–2305. doi: 10.1002/bit.24508
Publication History
- Issue published online: 25 JUL 2012
- Article first published online: 11 APR 2012
- Accepted manuscript online: 3 APR 2012 07:41AM EST
- Manuscript Accepted: 19 MAR 2012
- Manuscript Revised: 5 MAR 2012
- Manuscript Received: 5 JAN 2012
Funded by
- Sartorius-Stedim Biotech
- Abstract
- Article
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- disposable bioreactors;
- optical sensors;
- T-flasks;
- mass transfer;
- scale-down;
- seed train
Abstract
During the past decade, novel disposable cell culture vessels (generally referred to as Process Scouting Devices or PSDs) have become increasingly popular for laboratory scale studies and seed culture generation. However, the lack of engineering characterization and online monitoring tools for PSDs makes it difficult to elucidate their oxygen transfer capabilities. In this study, a mass transfer characterization (kLa) of sensor enabled static and rocking T-flasks is presented and compared with other non-instrumented PSDs such as CultiFlask 50®, spinner flasks, and SuperSpinner D 1000®. We have also developed a mass transfer empirical correlation that accounts for the contribution of convection and diffusion to the volumetric mass transfer coefficient (kLa) in rocking T-flasks. We also carried out a scale-down study at matched kLa between a rocking T75-flask and a 10 L (2 L filling volume) wave bioreactor (Cultibag®) and we observed similar DO and pH profiles as well as maximum cell density and protein titer. However, in this scale-down study, we also observed a negative correlation between cell growth and protein productivity between the rocking T-flask and the wave bioreactor. We hypothesize that this negative correlation can be due to hydrodynamic stress difference between the rocking T-flask and the Cultibag. As both cell culture devices share key similarities such as type of agitation (i.e., rocking), oxygen transfer capabilities (i.e., kLa) and disposability, we argue that rocking T-flasks can be readily integrated with wave bioreactors, making the transition from research-scale to manufacturing-scale a seamless process. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2012;109: 2295–2305. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

1097-0290/asset/BIT_left.gif?v=1&s=5f6054ce9ff7b0421e44e8e4e33966356f37b71c)
