SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Additional supporting information may be found in the online version of this article at the publisher's web-site.

FilenameFormatSizeDescription
bit25165-sm-0001-SuppData-S1.doc1282K

Figure SI. Sensitivity functions (3 × 9) with respect to time during enzymatic hydrolysis of Arundo at 39°C. From left to right panels represent (dS/dki), (dG2/dki), and (dG/dki), where ki (i = 1–9) represent k1r, K1IG2, K1IG, K1IX, k2r, K2M, K2IG, K2IX, S, respectively.

Figure SII. Experimental values of glucose during glucose-inhibition experiments during enzymatic hydrolysis of Arundo with initial glucose 20 g/L (▵), 15 g/L (○), and 0 g/L (□). The solid lines indicate the model predictions prior to reduction. The y-error bars indicate mean ± SE (n = 2).

Figure SIII. The time course concentrations (g/kg) of glucose (▵), cellulose (□) and cellobiose (○) obtained during enzymatic hydrolysis at different temperatures (A) 50°C (B) 45°C (C) 39°C, and (D) 32°C. The reduced model fits are shown by solid lines for corresponding experimental values.

Table SI. Model equations for hydrolysis, fermentation and in silico SSF.

Table SII. Parameter settings for the iterative dynamic programming.

Table SIII. Composition of pretreated Arundo material.

Please note: Wiley Blackwell is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.