Malignant large bowel obstruction
Article first published online: 7 DEC 2005
Copyright © 1985 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd.
British Journal of Surgery
Volume 72, Issue 4, pages 296–302, April 1985
How to Cite
Phillips, R. K. S., Hittinger, R., Fry, J. S. and Fielding, L. P. (1985), Malignant large bowel obstruction. Br J Surg, 72: 296–302. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800720417
- Issue published online: 7 DEC 2005
- Article first published online: 7 DEC 2005
- Manuscript Accepted: 15 NOV 1984
- Downs Surgical Ltd; the Jessie Williment Bequest; the Locally Organized Research Scheme, North West Thames Regional Health Authority; and the Cancer Research Campaign
- Colonic neoplasm;
- intestinal obstruction
Of 4583 patients in the Large Bowel Cancer Project, 713 (16 per cent) were obstructed. The site of greatest risk was the splenic flexure (49 per cent). Advanced stage was neither the full reason why some patients obstructed nor for their subsequent poor prospects (age-adjusted 5-year survival: not obstructed, 45 per cent; obstructed, 25 per cent). Also, there was no greater risk of vascular invasion, no heavier lymph node burden and no worse tumour differentiation in patients with obstruction. In-hospital mortality was high (23 per cent), was not reduced by either a policy of primary or staged resection and was not influenced by the site of obstruction. There was no survival advantage for either policy, but hospital stay after primary resection was half that of staged. Immediate anastomosis in the obstructed left colon had a high clinical leak rate (18 per cent versus 6 per cent elective; P < 0·001). Both registrars and consultants had similar mortality rates for elective primary resection and for the management of obstruction itself (as evidenced by results after the first stage of a staged resection). Selection probably accounts for the very much better results achieved by consultants for primary resection in the presence of obstruction (in-hospital mortality: consultants, 13 per cent; registrars, 24 per cent).