Caveats in the interpretation of the surgical literature


  • U. Guller

    Corresponding author
    1. Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    2. Department of Surgery, Divisions of General Surgery and Surgical Research, University Hospital Basle, Basle, Switzerland
    • Princess Margaret Hospital, University of Toronto, 600 University Avenue, Room 3-130, Toronto, ON M5B 2M9, Canada
    Search for more papers by this author


The ability to appraise research literature critically is an invaluable tool in the era of evidence-based medicine. The objective of this educational article is to highlight certain caveats that are important to those who seek to interpret the surgical literature. These caveats are illustrated with intuitive examples drawn from the field of surgery. It is hoped that the article will help surgeons to recognize the common pitfalls encountered when interpreting scientific reports. This is important if research findings are to be transferred appropriately into the realm of clinical practice. Copyright © 2008 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.