Fate of manuscripts declined by the British Journal of Surgery
Version of Record online: 22 JAN 2010
Copyright © 2010 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
British Journal of Surgery
Volume 97, Issue 3, pages 450–454, March 2010
How to Cite
Wijnhoven, B. P. L. and Dejong, C. H. C. (2010), Fate of manuscripts declined by the British Journal of Surgery. Br J Surg, 97: 450–454. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6880
- Issue online: 5 FEB 2010
- Version of Record online: 22 JAN 2010
- Manuscript Accepted: 22 SEP 2009
The fate of papers submitted and subsequently rejected by the British Journal of Surgery (BJS) is currently unknown. The present study was designed to investigate whether, when and where these papers are published following rejection.
All rejected manuscripts in the year 2006 were identified from the Manuscript Central electronic database. Between December 2008 and February 2009, a PubMed search was conducted spanning the period 2006-2009 using the corresponding author's last name and initials to identify whether and when manuscripts had been published elsewhere.
From the 926 manuscripts rejected by BJS, 609 (65·8 per cent) were published in 198 different journals with a mean(s.d.) time lapse of 13·8(6·5) months. Some 165 manuscripts (27·1 per cent) were published in general surgical journals, 250 (41·1 per cent) in subspecialty surgical journals and 194 (31·9 per cent) in non-surgical journals. The mean(s.d.) impact factor of the journals was 2·0(1·1). Only 14 manuscripts (2·3 per cent) were published in journals with a higher impact factor than that of BJS.
Rejection of a manuscript by BJS does not preclude publication, but rejected manuscripts are published more often in surgical subspecialty journals and journals with a lower impact factor, although the occasional exception exists. Copyright © 2010 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.