Presented in part to meetings of the Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland, London, UK, January 2009, and Cardiff, UK, July 2009, and published in abstract form as J Pathol 2009; 217(Suppl S1): S13 and J Pathol 2009; 217(Suppl S1): S36
Multicentre experience with extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer†
Article first published online: 23 FEB 2010
Copyright © 2010 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
British Journal of Surgery
Volume 97, Issue 4, pages 588–599, April 2010
How to Cite
West, N. P., Anderin, C., Smith, K. J. E., Holm, T. and Quirke, P. (2010), Multicentre experience with extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. Br J Surg, 97: 588–599. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6916
- Issue published online: 4 MAR 2010
- Article first published online: 23 FEB 2010
- Manuscript Accepted: 21 OCT 2009
- Yorkshire Cancer Research, Harrogate, UK
- Pelican Centre, Basingstoke, UK
Abdominoperineal excision (APE) for low rectal cancer is associated with higher rates of circumferential resection margin (CRM) involvement and intraoperative perforation (IOPs) than anterior resection for higher tumours. This multicentre observational study was designed to confirm that extralevator APE can improve outcomes and investigated the morbidity associated with such extensive surgery.
Some 176 extralevator APE procedures from 11 European colorectal surgeons were compared with 124 standard excisions from one UK centre. Clinical and pathological data were collected along with specimen photographs. Tissue morphometry was performed on the distal ten slices of the excision.
Extralevator APE removed more tissue from outside the smooth muscle layer per slice (median area 2120 versus 1259 mm2; P < 0·001) leading to a reduction in CRM involvement (from 49·6 to 20·3 per cent; P < 0·001) and IOP (from 28·2 to 8·2 per cent; P < 0·001) compared with standard surgery. However, extralevator surgery was associated with an increase in perineal wound complications (from 20 to 38·0 per cent; P = 0·019).
Extralevator APE is associated with less CRM involvement and IOP than standard surgery. Copyright © 2010 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.