Long-term follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of conventional versus laparoscopically assisted resection in colorectal cancer
Article first published online: 6 NOV 2012
Copyright © 2012 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
British Journal of Surgery
Volume 100, Issue 1, pages 75–82, January 2013
How to Cite
Green, B. L., Marshall, H. C., Collinson, F., Quirke, P., Guillou, P., Jayne, D. G. and Brown, J. M. (2013), Long-term follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of conventional versus laparoscopically assisted resection in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg, 100: 75–82. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8945
- Issue published online: 5 DEC 2012
- Article first published online: 6 NOV 2012
- Manuscript Accepted: 20 AUG 2012
- 1National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: Review of NICE Technology Appraisal 17. NICE: London, 2006.
- 14Complete mesocolic excision in colon cancer surgery: a comparison between open and laparoscopic approach distal right-sided colon cancer remains a challenge for laparoscopy. Colorectal Dis 2012; (Epub ahead of print)., , , , .
- 24Medical Research Council Conventional versus Laparoscopic-Assisted Surgery In Colorectal Cancer Trial Group. Patient factors influencing conversion from laparoscopically assisted to open surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 2008; 95: 199–205., , , , , ;