British Journal of Surgery

Cover image for Vol. 100 Issue 2

January 2013

Volume 100, Issue 2

Pages 169–301

  1. Editorial

    1. Top of page
    2. Editorial
    3. Centenary collection
    4. Leading articles
    5. Reviews
    6. Commentaries
    7. Systematic reviews
    8. Meta-Analysis
    9. Randomized Clinical Trials
    10. Original Articles
    11. Commentaries
    12. Original Articles
    13. Commentaries
    14. Original Articles
    15. Your Views
    16. Scientific Surgeries
    17. Erratum
    1. A century at the cutting edge (page 169)

      D. Alderson and J. J. Earnshaw

      Version of Record online: 13 DEC 2012 | DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9042

      Where next

  2. Centenary collection

    1. Top of page
    2. Editorial
    3. Centenary collection
    4. Leading articles
    5. Reviews
    6. Commentaries
    7. Systematic reviews
    8. Meta-Analysis
    9. Randomized Clinical Trials
    10. Original Articles
    11. Commentaries
    12. Original Articles
    13. Commentaries
    14. Original Articles
    15. Your Views
    16. Scientific Surgeries
    17. Erratum
    1. Volume 1 of the BJS (pages 170–171)

      H. Ellis

      Version of Record online: 13 DEC 2012 | DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9007

      Good start

  3. Leading articles

    1. Top of page
    2. Editorial
    3. Centenary collection
    4. Leading articles
    5. Reviews
    6. Commentaries
    7. Systematic reviews
    8. Meta-Analysis
    9. Randomized Clinical Trials
    10. Original Articles
    11. Commentaries
    12. Original Articles
    13. Commentaries
    14. Original Articles
    15. Your Views
    16. Scientific Surgeries
    17. Erratum
    1. The problem of the poor control arm in surgical randomized controlled trials (pages 172–173)

      O. Strobel and M. W. Büchler

      Version of Record online: 23 NOV 2012 | DOI: 10.1002/bjs.8998

      Greater attention needed to achieve equipoise in surgical trials

  4. Reviews

    1. Top of page
    2. Editorial
    3. Centenary collection
    4. Leading articles
    5. Reviews
    6. Commentaries
    7. Systematic reviews
    8. Meta-Analysis
    9. Randomized Clinical Trials
    10. Original Articles
    11. Commentaries
    12. Original Articles
    13. Commentaries
    14. Original Articles
    15. Your Views
    16. Scientific Surgeries
    17. Erratum
    1. You have free access to this content
      Sacral nerve stimulation for constipation (pages 174–181)

      G. P. Thomas, T. C. Dudding, G. Rahbour, R. J. Nicholls and C. J. Vaizey

      Version of Record online: 2 NOV 2012 | DOI: 10.1002/bjs.8944

      SNS probably effective in constipation

  5. Commentaries

    1. Top of page
    2. Editorial
    3. Centenary collection
    4. Leading articles
    5. Reviews
    6. Commentaries
    7. Systematic reviews
    8. Meta-Analysis
    9. Randomized Clinical Trials
    10. Original Articles
    11. Commentaries
    12. Original Articles
    13. Commentaries
    14. Original Articles
    15. Your Views
    16. Scientific Surgeries
    17. Erratum
  6. Systematic reviews

    1. Top of page
    2. Editorial
    3. Centenary collection
    4. Leading articles
    5. Reviews
    6. Commentaries
    7. Systematic reviews
    8. Meta-Analysis
    9. Randomized Clinical Trials
    10. Original Articles
    11. Commentaries
    12. Original Articles
    13. Commentaries
    14. Original Articles
    15. Your Views
    16. Scientific Surgeries
    17. Erratum
    1. Systematic review of phaeochromocytoma in pregnancy (pages 182–190)

      M. A. Biggar and T. W. J. Lennard

      Version of Record online: 23 NOV 2012 | DOI: 10.1002/bjs.8976

      Solutions for a difficult problem

  7. Meta-Analysis

    1. Top of page
    2. Editorial
    3. Centenary collection
    4. Leading articles
    5. Reviews
    6. Commentaries
    7. Systematic reviews
    8. Meta-Analysis
    9. Randomized Clinical Trials
    10. Original Articles
    11. Commentaries
    12. Original Articles
    13. Commentaries
    14. Original Articles
    15. Your Views
    16. Scientific Surgeries
    17. Erratum
    1. You have free access to this content
      Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (pages 191–208)

      S. Trastulli, R. Cirocchi, J. Desiderio, S. Guarino, A. Santoro, A. Parisi, G. Noya and C. Boselli

      Version of Record online: 12 NOV 2012 | DOI: 10.1002/bjs.8937

      No advantages for single incision

    2. Meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with liver cirrhosis and symptomatic cholecystolithiasis (pages 209–216)

      B. de Goede, P. J. Klitsie, S. M. Hagen, B. J. H. van Kempen, S. Spronk, H. J. Metselaar, J. F. Lange and G. Kazemier

      Version of Record online: 3 OCT 2012 | DOI: 10.1002/bjs.8911

      Laparoscopic probably better

  8. Randomized Clinical Trials

    1. Top of page
    2. Editorial
    3. Centenary collection
    4. Leading articles
    5. Reviews
    6. Commentaries
    7. Systematic reviews
    8. Meta-Analysis
    9. Randomized Clinical Trials
    10. Original Articles
    11. Commentaries
    12. Original Articles
    13. Commentaries
    14. Original Articles
    15. Your Views
    16. Scientific Surgeries
    17. Erratum
    1. Randomized clinical trial of trigger point infiltration with lidocaine to diagnose anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome (pages 217–221)

      O. B. A. Boelens, M. R. Scheltinga, S. Houterman and R. M. Roumen

      Version of Record online: 23 NOV 2012 | DOI: 10.1002/bjs.8958

      Trigger point injection helpful

    2. Long-term results of a randomized clinical trial comparing Roux-en-equation image gastric bypass with vertical banded gastroplasty (pages 222–230)

      M. Werling, L. Fändriks, P. Björklund, A. Maleckas, J. Brandberg, H. Lönroth, C. W. le Roux and T. Olbers

      Version of Record online: 23 NOV 2012 | DOI: 10.1002/bjs.8975

      Vertical banded gastroplasty should be abandoned

  9. Original Articles

    1. Top of page
    2. Editorial
    3. Centenary collection
    4. Leading articles
    5. Reviews
    6. Commentaries
    7. Systematic reviews
    8. Meta-Analysis
    9. Randomized Clinical Trials
    10. Original Articles
    11. Commentaries
    12. Original Articles
    13. Commentaries
    14. Original Articles
    15. Your Views
    16. Scientific Surgeries
    17. Erratum
    1. Modelling the cost-effectiveness of carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic stenosis (pages 231–239)

      A. Thapar, L. Garcia Mochon, D. Epstein, J. Shalhoub and A. H. Davies

      Version of Record online: 23 NOV 2012 | DOI: 10.1002/bjs.8960

      Cost effective for the under 75s

    2. Integration of patient-reported outcome measures with key clinical outcomes after immediate latissimus dorsi breast reconstruction and adjuvant treatment (pages 240–251)

      Z. E. Winters, J. Haviland, V. Balta, J. Benson, A. Reece-Smith, N. Betambeau and The Prospective Trial Management Group

      Version of Record online: 22 NOV 2012 | DOI: 10.1002/bjs.8959

      PROMs should be standard

    3. Expression of cell adhesion molecules and prognosis in breast cancer (pages 252–260)

      S. Saadatmand, E. M. de Kruijf, A. Sajet, N. G. Dekker-Ensink, J. G. H. van Nes, H. Putter, V. T. H. B. M. Smit, C. J. H. van de Velde, G. J. Liefers and P. J. K. Kuppen

      Version of Record online: 22 NOV 2012 | DOI: 10.1002/bjs.8980

      New prognostic markers

    4. Lymphadenectomy around the left renal vein in Siewert type II adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction (pages 261–266)

      S. Mine, T. Sano, N. Hiki, K. Yamada, S. Nunobe and T. Yamaguchi

      Version of Record online: 23 NOV 2012 | DOI: 10.1002/bjs.8967

      Merits confirmation in the west

    5. Recurrence pattern in patients with a pathologically complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery for oesophageal cancer (pages 267–273)

      P. van Hagen, B. P. L. Wijnhoven, P. Nafteux, J. Moons, K. Haustermans, G. De Hertogh, J. J. B. van Lanschot and T. Lerut

      Version of Record online: 23 NOV 2012 | DOI: 10.1002/bjs.8968

      Local recurrence is still a problem

    6. Multicentre European study of preoperative biliary drainage for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (pages 274–283)

      O. Farges, J. M. Regimbeau, D. Fuks, Y. P. Le Treut, D. Cherqui, P. Bachellier, J. Y. Mabrut, M. Adham, F. R. Pruvot and J. F. Gigot

      Version of Record online: 2 NOV 2012 | DOI: 10.1002/bjs.8950

      Left is not right

  10. Commentaries

    1. Top of page
    2. Editorial
    3. Centenary collection
    4. Leading articles
    5. Reviews
    6. Commentaries
    7. Systematic reviews
    8. Meta-Analysis
    9. Randomized Clinical Trials
    10. Original Articles
    11. Commentaries
    12. Original Articles
    13. Commentaries
    14. Original Articles
    15. Your Views
    16. Scientific Surgeries
    17. Erratum
  11. Original Articles

    1. Top of page
    2. Editorial
    3. Centenary collection
    4. Leading articles
    5. Reviews
    6. Commentaries
    7. Systematic reviews
    8. Meta-Analysis
    9. Randomized Clinical Trials
    10. Original Articles
    11. Commentaries
    12. Original Articles
    13. Commentaries
    14. Original Articles
    15. Your Views
    16. Scientific Surgeries
    17. Erratum
    1. Value of laparoscopy before cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal carcinomatosis (pages 285–292)

      L. H. Iversen, P. C. Rasmussen and S. Laurberg

      Version of Record online: 2 NOV 2012 | DOI: 10.1002/bjs.8908

      May avoid unnecessary major surgery

  12. Commentaries

    1. Top of page
    2. Editorial
    3. Centenary collection
    4. Leading articles
    5. Reviews
    6. Commentaries
    7. Systematic reviews
    8. Meta-Analysis
    9. Randomized Clinical Trials
    10. Original Articles
    11. Commentaries
    12. Original Articles
    13. Commentaries
    14. Original Articles
    15. Your Views
    16. Scientific Surgeries
    17. Erratum
  13. Original Articles

    1. Top of page
    2. Editorial
    3. Centenary collection
    4. Leading articles
    5. Reviews
    6. Commentaries
    7. Systematic reviews
    8. Meta-Analysis
    9. Randomized Clinical Trials
    10. Original Articles
    11. Commentaries
    12. Original Articles
    13. Commentaries
    14. Original Articles
    15. Your Views
    16. Scientific Surgeries
    17. Erratum
    1. Impact of obesity on the cost of major colorectal surgery (pages 293–298)

      R. Tapper, L. Dixon, C. Frampton and F. Frizelle

      Version of Record online: 22 NOV 2012 | DOI: 10.1002/bjs.8978

      More expensive in obese patients

  14. Your Views

    1. Top of page
    2. Editorial
    3. Centenary collection
    4. Leading articles
    5. Reviews
    6. Commentaries
    7. Systematic reviews
    8. Meta-Analysis
    9. Randomized Clinical Trials
    10. Original Articles
    11. Commentaries
    12. Original Articles
    13. Commentaries
    14. Original Articles
    15. Your Views
    16. Scientific Surgeries
    17. Erratum
  15. Scientific Surgeries

    1. Top of page
    2. Editorial
    3. Centenary collection
    4. Leading articles
    5. Reviews
    6. Commentaries
    7. Systematic reviews
    8. Meta-Analysis
    9. Randomized Clinical Trials
    10. Original Articles
    11. Commentaries
    12. Original Articles
    13. Commentaries
    14. Original Articles
    15. Your Views
    16. Scientific Surgeries
    17. Erratum
    1. Scientific surgery (page 300)

      Version of Record online: 13 DEC 2012 | DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9037

  16. Erratum

    1. Top of page
    2. Editorial
    3. Centenary collection
    4. Leading articles
    5. Reviews
    6. Commentaries
    7. Systematic reviews
    8. Meta-Analysis
    9. Randomized Clinical Trials
    10. Original Articles
    11. Commentaries
    12. Original Articles
    13. Commentaries
    14. Original Articles
    15. Your Views
    16. Scientific Surgeries
    17. Erratum
    1. You have free access to this content
      Erratum: Comparative study of anal acoustic reflectometry and anal manometry in the assessment of faecal incontinence (page 301)

      B. R. Hornung, P. J. Mitchell, G. L. Carlson, N. Klarskov, G. Lose and E. S. Kiff

      Version of Record online: 13 DEC 2012 | DOI: 10.1002/bjs.9036

      This article corrects:

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION