Comparison of student performance in cooperative learning and traditional lecture-based biochemistry classes
Version of Record online: 3 NOV 2006
Copyright © 2005 International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education
Volume 33, Issue 6, pages 387–393, November 2005
How to Cite
Anderson, W. L., Mitchell, S. M. and Osgood, M. P. (2005), Comparison of student performance in cooperative learning and traditional lecture-based biochemistry classes. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ., 33: 387–393. doi: 10.1002/bmb.2005.49403306387
- Issue online: 3 NOV 2006
- Version of Record online: 3 NOV 2006
- Manuscript Revised: 22 JUL 2005
- Manuscript Received: 7 APR 2005
- 12001) Beyond Affirmative Action: Reframing the Context of Higher Education, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, WI, 43–78.(
- 2BEST (2004) A Bridge for All: Higher Education Design Principles to Broaden Participation in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics, BEST, Building Engineering and Science Talent, San Diego, CA.
- 81997) Student progress assessment: A cumulative performance assessment, Proceedings of the International Conference on Medical Education, Vienna, Austria, Sept., , , , , , , , (
- 10J. D.Bransford, A. L.Brown, R. R.Cocking, eds. (2000) How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School, National Academy Press, Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning, Washington, D.C.
- 132000) Learning from problems, The Science Teacher 67, 28–32.(