SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    E. Bell ( 2001) The future of education in the molecular life sciences. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2, 221225.
  • 2
    E. J. Wood ( 2001) Biochemistry and molecular biology teaching over the past 50 years. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2, 217221.
  • 3
    Board of life sciences ( 2003) BIO2010: Transforming Undergraduate Education for Future Research Biologists, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
  • 4
    R. Boyer ( 2003) Concepts and skills in the biochemistry/molecular biology lab. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ. 31, 102105.
  • 5
    J. D.Bransford,A. L.Brown,R. R.Cocking, Eds. ( 2000) How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience and School, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
  • 6
    J. Handelsman,D. Evert-May,R. Beichner,P. Bruns,A. Chang,R. DeHaan,J. Gentile,S. Lauffer,J. Stewart,S. M. Tilghman,W. B. Wood ( 2004) Scientific teaching. Science 304, 521522.
  • 7
    R. R. Hake ( 1998) Interactive-engagement vs traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. Am. J. Phys. 66, 6474.
  • 8
    M. Prince ( 2004) Does active learning work? A review of the research. J. Eng. Educ. 93, 223231.
  • 9
    G. R. Norman,H. G. Schmidt ( 2000) Effectiveness of problem-based learning curricula: Theory, practice and paper darts. Med. Educ. 34, 721728.
  • 10
    Interactive-engagement methods in introductory mechanics courses. Available at: http://www.physics.indiana.edu/%7Esdi/IEM-2b.pdf (accessed on January 2, 2009).
  • 11
    T. Eberlein,J. Kampmeier,V. Minderhout,R. S. Moog,T. Platt,P. Varma-Nelson,H. B. White ( 2008) Pedagogies of engagement in science. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ. 36, 262273.
  • 12
    D. Hestenes,M. Wells,G. Swackhamer ( 1992) Force concept inventory. Phys. Teacher 30, 141158.
  • 13
    I. Halloun,D. Hestenes ( 1985) The initial knowledge state of college physics students. Am. J. Phys. 53, 10431055.
  • 14
    C. Crouch,E. Mazur ( 2001) Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. Am. J. Phys. 69, 970977.
  • 15
    N. Lasry,E. Mazur,J. Watkins ( 2008) Peer instruction: From Harvard to community colleges. Am. J. Phys. 76, 10661069.
  • 16
    R. R. Hake ( 2007) Six lessons from the physics education reform effort. Latin Am. J. Phys. Educ. 1, 2431.
  • 17
    P. K. Rangachari,U. Rangachari ( 2007) Information literacy in an inquiry course for first-year science undergraduates: A simplified 3C approach. Adv. Physiol. Educ. 31, 176179.
  • 18
    J. C. Sousa,M. J. Costa,J. A. Palha ( 2007) Hormone-mediated gene regulation and bioinformatics: Learning one from the other. PLoS ONE 2: e481.
  • 19
    P. K. Rangachari ( 2006) Promoting self-directed learning using a menu of assessment options: The investment model. Adv. Physiol. Educ. 30, 181194.
  • 20
    J. Michael ( 2006) Where's the evidence that active learning works? Adv. Physiol. Educ. 30, 159167.
  • 21
    K. Garvin-Doxas,M. Klymkowsky,S. Elrod ( 2007) Building, using, and maximizing the impact of concept inventories in the biological sciences: Report on a National Science Foundation-sponsored conference on the construction of concept inventories in the biological sciences. CBE Life Sci. Educ. 6, 277282.
  • 22
    J. Michael,J. McFarland,A. Wright ( 2008) The second conceptual assessment in the biological sciences workshop. Adv. Physiol. Educ. 32, 248251.
  • 23
    S. Howitt,T. Anderson,M. J. Costa,S. Hamilton,A. Wright( 2008) A concept inventory for molecular life sciences: How will it help your teaching practice? Aust. Biochem. 39, 1417.
  • 24
    D. Stead ( 2005) A review of the one-minute paper. Active Learn. Higher Educ. 6, 118131.
  • 25
    R. M. Felder ( 1997) Beating the numbers game: Effective teaching in large classes, Proceedings of the American Society of Engineering Education Annual Conference, Milwaukee, USA. Available at: http://www4.ncsu.edu/unity/lockers/users/f/felder/public/Papers/Large classes.htm (accessed on January 2, 2009).
  • 26
    T. A. Angelo,K. P. Cross ( 1993) Classroom Assessment Techniques, A Handbook for College Teachers, 2nd ed., Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
  • 27
    Office of Institutional Research & Assessment Item bank, Syracuse University. Available at: http://oira.syr.edu/Assessment/StudentRate/CreateForm.htm (accessed on January 2, 2009).
  • 28
    Professional and Organizational Development Network. Available at http://www.podnetwork.org/ (accessed on January 2, 2009).
  • 29
    D. Kember ( 2003) To control or not to control: The question of whether experimental designs are appropriate for evaluating teaching innovations in higher education. Assess. Eval. Higher Educ. 28, 89101.
  • 30
    R. Hake, in A. E.Kelly,R. A.Lesh,J. Y.Baek, Eds. ( 2008) Handbook of Design Research Methods in Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 493508.