SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    T. R. Anderson,K. J. Schönborn ( 2008) Bridging the educational research-teaching practice gap: Conceptual understanding, Part 1: The multifaceted nature of expert knowledge. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ. 36, 309315.
  • 2
    K. J. Schönborn,T. R. Anderson ( 2008) Bridging the educational research-teaching practice gap: Conceptual understanding, Part 2: Assessing and developing student knowledge. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ. 36, 372379.
  • 3
    K. J. Schönborn,T. R. Anderson ( 2006) The importance of visual literacy in the education of biochemists. Biochem. Mol. Bio. Educ. 34, 94102.
  • 4
    K. J. Schönborn,T. R. Anderson ( 2009) A model of factors determining students' ability to interpret external representations in biochemistry. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 31, 193232.
  • 5
    A. Bamford ( 2003) The visual literacy white paper, Adobe Systems, Stockley Park, UK.
  • 6
    J. G. Voet,D. H. Voet ( 2008) Education corner. RCSB Protein Data Bank Newsletter 38, 56.
  • 7
    S. I. O'Donoghue,D. S. Goodsell,A. S. Frangakis,F. Jossinet,R. A. Laskowski,M. Nilges,H. R. Saibil,A. Schafferhans,R. C. Wade,E. Westhof,A. J. Olson ( 2010) Visualization of macromolecular structures. Nat. Methods 7, S42S55.
  • 8
    S. Bottomley,D. Chandler,E. Morgan,E. Helmerhorst ( 2006) jAMVLE, A new integrated molecular visualization learning environment. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ. 34, 343349.
  • 9
    A. Herráez ( 2006) Biomolecules in the computer: Jmol to the rescue. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ. 34, 255261.
  • 10
    E. Hodis,J. L. Sussman ( 2008) An encyclopedic effort to make 3D structures easier to understand. Trends Biochem. Sci. 34, 100101.
  • 11
    Y. Rotbain,G. Marbach-Ad,R. Stavy ( 2006) Effect of bead and illustrations models on high-school students' achievement in molecular genetics. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 43, 500529.
  • 12
    J. R. Roberts,E. Hagedorn,P. Dillenburg,M. Patrick,T. Herman ( 2005) Physical models enhance molecular three-dimensional literacy in an introductory biochemistry course. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ. 33, 105110.
  • 13
    K. J. Schönborn,T. R. Anderson,D. J. Grayson ( 2002) Student difficulties with the interpretation of a textbook diagram of immunoglobulin G (IgG). Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ. 30, 9397.
  • 14
    M. D. Patrick,G. Carter,E. N. Wiebe ( 2005) Visual representations of DNA replication: Middle grades students' perceptions and interpretations. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 14, 353365.
  • 15
    G. Marbach-Ad,Y. Rotbain,R. Stavy ( 2008) Using computer animation and illustration activities to improve high school students' achievement in molecular genetics. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 45, 273292.
  • 16
    C.-J. A. Rundgren,L. A. E. Tibell ( 2010) Critical features of visualizations of transport through the cell membrane – an empirical study of upper secondary and tertiary students' meaning-making of a still image and an animation. Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ. 8, 223246.
  • 17
    P. Bivall Persson,M. D. Cooper,L. A. E. Tibell,S. Ainsworth,A. Ynnerman,B.-H. Jonsson, in:D. Bowman,S. Julier,Chairs ( 2007) Proceedings of the IEEE Virtual Reality Conference, IEEE, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA, pp. 171178.
  • 18
    M. Avgerinou,J. Ericson ( 1997) A review of the concept of visual literacy. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 28, 280291.
  • 19
    R. Lowe,W. Schnotz ( 2007) Learning with Animation: Research Implications for Design, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
  • 20
    M. Cook,G. Carter,E. N. Wiebe ( 2008) The interpretation of cellular transport graphics by students with low and high prior knowledge. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 30, 239261.
  • 21
    H.-R. Dahmani,P. Schneeberger,I. M. Kramer ( 2009) Analysis of students' aptitude to provide meaning to images that represent cellular components at the molecular level. CBE Life Sci. Educ. 8, 226238.
  • 22
    D. S. Goodsell ( 2006) Seeing the nanoscale. Nanotoday 1, 4449.
  • 23
    B. White ( 2006) A simple and effective protein folding activity suitable for large lectures. CBE Life Sci. Educ. 5, 264269.
  • 24
    T. Herman,J. Morris,S. Colton,A. Batiza,M. Patrick,M. Franzen,D. S. Goodsell ( 2006) Tactile teaching: Exploring protein structure/function using physical models. Biochem. Mol. Bio. Educ. 34, 247254.
  • 25
    D. C. Richardson,J. S. Richardson ( 2002) Teaching molecular 3-D literacy. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ. 30, 2126.
  • 26
    M. A. Harris,R. F. Peck,S. Colton,J. Morris,E. C. Neto,J. Kallio ( 2009) A combination of hand-held models and computer imaging programs helps students answer oral questions about molecular structure and function: A controlled investigation of student learning. CBE-Life Sci. Educ. 8, 2943.
  • 27
    D. Booth,R. C. Bateman,R. Sirochman,D. C. Richardson,J. S. Richardson,S. W. Weiner,M. Farwell,C. Putnam-Evans ( 2005) Assessment of molecular construction in undergraduate biochemistry. J. Chem. Educ. 82, 18541858.
  • 28
    T. Aegerter-Wilmsen,F. Janssen,R. Hartog,T. Bisseling ( 2005) Digital learning material for model building in molecular biology. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 14, 123134.
  • 29
    L. M. Beltramini,A. P. U. Araújo,T. H. G. de Oliveira,L. D. dos Santos Abel,A. R. da Silva,N. F. dos Santos ( 2006) A new three-dimensional educational model kit for building DNA and RNA molecules: Development and evaluation. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ. 34, 187193.
  • 30
    K. J. Schönborn,S. Bögeholz ( 2009) Knowledge transfer in biology and translation across external representations: Experts' views and challenges for learning. Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ. 7, 931955.
  • 31
    D. J. Kelley,R. J. Davidson,D. L. Nelson ( 2008) An imaging roadmap for biology education: From nanoparticles to whole organisms. CBE Life Sci. Educ. 7, 202209.
  • 32
    R. G. Duncan,B. J. Reiser ( 2007) Reasoning across ontologically distinct levels: Students' understandings of molecular genetics. J. Res. Sci Teach. 44, 938959.
  • 33
    G. Nicoll ( 2003) A qualitative investigation of undergraduate chemistry students' macroscopic interpretations of the submicroscopic structure of molecules. J. Chem. Educ. 80, 205213.
  • 34
    R. Tasker,R. Dalton ( 2006) Research into practice: Visualisation of the molecular world using animations. Chem. Educ. Res. Prac. 7, 141159.
  • 35
    A. H. Johnstone ( 2010) You can't get there from here. J. Chem. Educ. 87, 2229.
  • 36
    P. M. Ross,C. E. Taylor,C. Hughes,M. Kofod,N. Whitaker,L. Lutze-Mann,V. Tzioumis, in J. H. FMeyer,R.Land,C.Baillie, Eds. ( 2009) Threshold Concepts and Transformational Learning, Sense Publishers, Rotterdam.
  • 37
    S. Y. Stevens,L. M. Sutherland,J. S. Krajcik ( 2009) The Big Ideas of Nanoscale Science and Engineering: A Guidebook for Secondary Teachers, NSTA Press, Arlington, VA.
  • 38
    M. G. Jones,T. Andre,R. Superfine,R. Taylor,R. ( 2003) Learning at the nanoscale: The impact of students' use of remote microscopy on concepts of viruses, scale, and microscopy. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 40, 303322.
  • 39
    M. G. Jones,A. Taylor,J. Minogue,B. Broadwell,E. Wiebe,G. Carter ( 2006) Understanding scale: Powers of ten. J. Sci. Educ. Technol. 16, 191202.
  • 40
    M. G. Jones,T. Tretter,A. Taylor,T. Oppewal ( 2008) Experienced and novice teachers' concepts of spatial scale. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 30, 409429.
  • 41
    H.-K. Wu,P. Shah ( 2004) Exploring visuospatial thinking in chemistry learning. Sci. Educ. 88, 465492.
  • 42
    R. C. Garratt,C. A. Orengo ( 2008) The Protein Chart, Wiley VCH Publishers, Weinheim.
  • 43
    R. Kozma,J. Russell, in J.Gilbert, Ed. ( 2005), Visualization in Science Education, Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 121146.
  • 44
    H. Tuckey,M. Selvaratnam ( 1993) Studies involving three-dimensional visualisation skills in chemistry: A review. Studies Sci. Educ. 21, 99121.
  • 45
    Foldit, solve puzzles for science, Available at: http://fold.it/portal/ (accessed July 14, 2009).
  • 46
    S. Ainsworth ( 1999) The functions of multiple representations. Comput. Educ. 33, 131152.
  • 47
    T. R. Anderson ( 2007) Bridging the educational research-teaching practice gap: The power of assessment. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ. 35, 471477.