• 1
    E. Bell( 2001) The future of education in the molecular life sciences. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2, 221225.
  • 2
    H. B. White( 1996) Addressing content in problem-based courses: The learning issue matrix. Biochem. Educ. 24, 4145.
  • 3
    R. G. Baraniuk,C. S. Burrus,B. M. Hendricks,G. L. Henry,A. O. Hero,III,D. H. Johnson,D. L. Jones,J. Kusuma,R. D. Nowak,J. E. Odegard,L. C. Potter,K. Ramchandran,R. J. Reedstrom,P. Schniter,I. W. Selesnick,D. B. Williams,W. L. Wilson( 2002) Connexions: DSP education for a networked world, Proceedings of ICASSP ′02. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. Pine Mountain, GA.
  • 4
    B. Vidic,H. Weitlauf( 2002) Horizontal and vertical integration of academic disciplines in the medical school curriculum. Clin. Anat. 15, 233235.
  • 5
    E. Seymour,N. M. Hewitt( 2000) Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences, Westview Press, Colorado.
  • 6
    Vision and Change in Undergraduate Biology Education. Available at:
  • 7
    J. McTighe,G. Wiggins( 1999) The Understanding by Design Handbook, Chapter 4, Module 4, Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development, Alexandra, VA. Available at:
  • 8
    J. A. Moore( 1987) Science as a way of knowing: Developmental biology. Am. Zool. 27, 415573.
  • 9
    J. Nesbit,O. Adesope( 2006) Learning with concept and knowledge maps: A meta-analysis. Rev. Educ. Res. 76, 413448.
  • 10
    AAAS Vision and Change in Undergraduate Biology Education Initiative( 2009) Vision and Change in Undergraduate Biology Education: A Call to Action, AAAS, Washington, DC. Available at:
  • 11
    J. Michael,H. Modell,J. McFarland,W. Cliff( 2009) The “core principles” of physiology: What should students understand? Adv. Physiol. Educ. 33, 1016.
  • 12
    G. Wiggins,J. McTighe( 2005) Understanding by Design, Expanded 2nd ed., Pearson Education, New Jersey.
  • 13
    R. A. Duschl,H. A. Schweingruber,A. W. Shouse, Eds.( 2007) Taking Science to School: Learning and Teaching Science in Grades K-8, National Academy, Washington, DC.
  • 14
    J. G. Voet,E. Bell,R. Boyer,J. Boyle,M. O'Leary,J. K. Zimmerman( 2003) Recommended curriculum for a program in biochemistry and molecular biology. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ. 31, 161162.
  • 15
    E. Bell( 2003) Implementing the American society for biochemistry and molecular biology recommended curriculum in a biochemistry and molecular biology degree program hosted jointly by a chemistry and biology department: The Richmond experience. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ. 31, 225227.
  • 16
    J. A. Boyle( 2003) Implementing the recommended curriculum in a biochemistry and molecular biology degree program in a biochemistry and molecular biology department: The Mississippi State Experience. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ. 31, 283285.
  • 17
    The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology( 2010) Biochemistry/Molecular Biology and Liberal Education: A Report to the Teagle Foundation, The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Bethesda, MD. Available at:
  • 18
    J. K. Zimmerman,R. F. Boyer( 1993) ASBMB Educational Affairs Committee studies undergraduate biochemistry and molecular biology degrees. FASEB J. 7, 733734.
  • 19
    Call to the Sixth Annual Northwest Regional Undergraduate Affiliate Network Meeting Undergraduate Research in the Molecular Sciences (URMS)( 2010). Available at:
  • 20
    Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary( 1913). Available at:
  • 21
    H. L. Erickson( 2002) Concept-Based Curriculum and Instruction: Teaching Beyond the Facts, Corwin Press, California, p. 66.
  • 22
    S. Howitt,T. Anderson,M. Costa,S. Hamilton,T. Wright( 2008) A concept inventory for molecular life sciences: How will it help your teaching practice? Aust. Biochemist. 39, 1417.
  • 23
    T. Wright,S. Hamilton( 2008) Assessing student understanding in the molecular life sciences using a concept inventory, Australian Technology Network (ATN) Assessment Conference, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia.
  • 24
    E. S. Russell( 1930) The Interpretation of Development and Heredity. A Study in Biological Method, The Clarendon Press, Oxford.
  • 25
    K. Garvin-Doxas,M. Klymkowsky,S. Elrod( 2007) Building, using, and maximizing the impact of concept inventories in the biological sciences: Report on a National Science Foundation–sponsored conference on the construction of concept inventories in the biological sciences. CBE Life Sci. Educ. 6, 277282.
  • 26
    H. Rosenberg,R. Coffman,M. F. Jafari,S. Prabhu,K. Tallian( 1998) New approach to teaching basic science courses: Biochemistry and molecular biology in the block system of curricular design. Am. J. Pharm. Educ. 62, 7682.
  • 27
    W. J. Marshall,S. K. Bangert( 2008) Clinical Biochemistry: Metabolic and Clinical Aspects, Elsevier Ltd, Philadelphia, p. 1.
  • 28
    K. L. Lerner,B. W. Lerner, Eds.( 2003) Biochemistry. World of Microbiology and Immunology, Gale Cengage,2003. 2006. Accessed 30 Nov, 2010 Online:
  • 29
    D. Lebow( 1993) Constructivist values for instructional systems design: Five principles toward a new mindset. Educ. Technol. R&D. 41, 416.
  • 30
    T. J. Greenbowe,K. A. Burke, Instruction by Using the Writing Heuristic, in B. M. Hand, Ed.( 2008) Science Inquiry Argument and Language: A Case for the Science Writing Heuristic, Sense Publishers, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, p. 139150.
  • 31
    ACARA (Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority) Australian Curriculum Information Sheet. Science( 2010). Available at: Senior_Sec_v1_FINAL.pdf.