SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    American Association for the Advancement of Science ( 2009) Vision and Change a Call to Action. Available at: http://visionandchange.org/files/2011/03/Revised-Vision-and-Change-Final-Report.pdf. American Association for the Advancement of Science. Accessed on: April 1, 2011.
  • 2
    National Academies of Sciences( 2007) Rising above the Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future, National Academies Press, Washington DC.
  • 3
    National Research Council( 2009) Transforming Agricultural Education for a Changing World, National Academy Press, Washington DC.
  • 4
    National Research Council Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning, J. D. Bransford,A. L. Brown,R. R. Cocking, Eds. ( 2000) How People Learn: Mind, Experience, and School, National Academy Press, Washington DC.
  • 5
    National Research Council Committee on the Foundations of Assessment, N. Pellegrino,R. Glaser, Eds. Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Academy Press, Washington DC.
  • 6
    G. M. Bodner ( 1986) Constructivism: a theory of knowledge. J. Chem. Educ. 63, 873879.
  • 7
    L. Deslauriers,E. Schelew,C. Wieman ( 2011) Improved learning in a large-enrollment physics class. Science 332, 862864.
  • 8
    T. Eberlein,J. Kampmeier,V. Minderhout,R. S. Moog,T. Platt,P. Varma-Nelson,H. B. White ( 2008) Pedagogies of engagement in science: A comparison of PBL, POGIL, and PLTL. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ. 36, 262273.
  • 9
    L. Gafney,P. Varma-Nelson ( 2008) Peer-led Team Learning: Evaluation, Dissemination, and Institutionalization of a College Level Initiative, Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
  • 10
    R. Greenaway ( 1992) Doing reviewing. J. Advent. Educ. Outdoor Leader. 9, 1517.
  • 11
    M. Prince ( 2004) Does active learning work? A review of the research. J. Eng. Educ. 93, 223231.
  • 12
    M. A. Ruiz-Primo,D. Briggs,H. Iverson,R. Talbot,L. A.Shepard ( 2011) Impact of undergraduate science course innovations on learning. Science, 331, 12691270.
  • 13
    M. Silberman ( 1996) Active Learning: 101 Strategies to Teach Any Subject, Prentice Hall, Des Moines, IA.
  • 14
    A. Straumanis,E. A. Simons in R. S. Moog,J. N. Spencer, Eds. ( 2008) Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL), American Chemical Society, Washington DC. pp. 226239.
  • 15
    B. S. Bloom,M. D. Englehart,E. J. Furst,W. H. Hill,D. R. Kathwohl ( 1956) Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook 1: Cognitive Domain, David McKay Company Inc., New York.
  • 16
    M. G. Hewson,P. W. Hewson ( 1983) Effect of instruction using students' prior knowledge and conceptual change strategies on science learning. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 20, 731743.
  • 17
    S. Tobias ( 1994) Interest, prior knowledge, and learning. Rev. Educ. Res. 64, 3754.
  • 18
    POGIL, Available at: www.pogil.org, POGIL, American Chemical Society, Washington DC, Accessed on July 9, 2011.
  • 19
    J. J. Farrell,R. S. Moog,J. N. Spencer ( 1999) A guided inquiry general chemistry course. J. Chem. Educ. 76, 570574.
  • 20
    D. Hale,L. G. Mullen ( 2009) Designing process oriented guided inquiry activities: A new innovation for marketing class. Market. Educ. Rev. 19, 7380.
  • 21
    D. M. Hanson in R. S. Moog,J. N. Spencer, Eds. ( 2008) Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL), American Chemical Society, Washington DC. pp. 1425.
  • 22
    R. J. Hinde,J. Kovac ( 2001) Student active learning methods in physical chemistry. J. Chem. Educ. 78, 9399.
  • 23
    V. Minderhout,J. Loertscher ( 2007) Lecture-free biochemistry. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ. 35, 172180.
  • 24
    S. M. Ruder,S. S. Hunnicutt in R. S. Moog,J. N. Spencer, Eds. ( 2008) Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL), American Chemical Society, Washington DC. pp. 211223.
  • 25
    M. R. Abraham in N. J. Pienta,M. M. Cooper,T. J. Greenbowe, Eds. ( 2005) Chemist's Guide to Effective Teaching, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, pp. 4152.
  • 26
    A. E. Lawson ( 1995) Science Teaching and the Development of Thinking, Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.
  • 27
    National Association of Colleges and Employers ( 2010) Job Outlook Survey 2011, National Association of Colleges and Employers. Bethlehem, PA. Available at: http://www.naceweb.org/home.aspx, Accessed on July 14, 2011.
  • 28
    D. L. Nelson,M. M. Cox ( 2010) Lehninger Principles of Biochemistry, 5th ed., Freeman and Company, New York.
  • 29
    J. Loertscher,V. Minderhout ( 2010) Foundations of Biochemistry, Pacific Crest, Lisle, IL.
  • 30
    S. Villafañe,C. P. Bailey,J. Loertscher,V. Minderhout,J. E. Lewis ( 2011) Development and analysis of an instrument to assess student understanding of foundational concepts prior to biochemistry coursework. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ. 39, 102109.
  • 31
    S. Villafañe,J. Loertscher,V. Minderhout,J. E. Lewis ( 2011) Uncovering students' incorrect ideas about foundational concepts for biochemistry. Chem. Educ. Res. Prac. 12, 210218.
  • 32
    ASBMB Report: Biochemistry/Molecular Biology and Liberal Education: A Report to the Teagle Foundation, Rockvile, MD. Available at http://www.asbmb.org/uploadedFiles/ProfessionalDevelopment/Resources/Teagle%20Report(1).pdf, ASBMB. Accessed on July 14, 2011.
  • 33
    M. Weimer ( 2002) Learner-Centered Teaching, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.
  • 34
    D. C. Haak,J. HilleRisLambers,E. Pitre,S. Freeman ( 2011) Increased structure and active learning reduce the achievement gap in introductory biology. Science 332, 12131216.