• 1
    Huang, P. C. (2000) The integrative nature of biochemistry: Challenges of biochemical education in the USA. Biochem. Educ. 28, 6470.
  • 2
    Bodner, G. M. (1986) Constructivism: A theory of knowledge. J. Chem. Educ. 63, 873878.
  • 3
    Von Glasersfeld. (1987) Preliminaries to any theory of representation. in Janvier, C. Ed. Problems of Representation in the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 215226.
  • 4
    Curriculum recommended by ASBMB, American Society of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (ASBMB). Available at: (Accessed February 4, 2013).
  • 5
    Villafane, S. Bailey, C. Loertscher, J. Minderhout, V. and Lewis, J. E. (2011) Development and analysis of an instrument to assess student understanding of foundational concepts before biochemistry coursework. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ. 2, 102109.
  • 6
    Harle, M. and Towns, M. H. (2012) Students' understanding of external representations of the potassium ion channel protein, part I: Affordances and limitations of ribbon diagrams, vines, and hydrophobic/polar representations. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ. 40, 349356.
  • 7
    Harle, M. and Towns, M. H. (2012) Students' understanding of external representations of the potassium ion channel protein part II: Structure–function relationships and fragmented knowledge. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ. 40, 357363.
  • 8
    Patton, M. Q. (2001) Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, 3rd ed., Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
  • 9
    Livescribe: Never miss a word. Available at: (Accessed January, 2013).
  • 10
    Linenberger, K. and Bretz, S. L. (2012) A novel technology to investigate students' understandings of enzyme representations. J. Coll. Sci. Teach. 42, 4549.
  • 11
    Anderson, L. W. and Krathwohl, D. R., Eds. (2001) A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Longman, New York.
  • 12
    VanMeter, P. and Garner, J. (2005) The promise and practice of learning-generated drawing: Literature review and synthesis. Educ. Psych. Rev. 17, 285325.
  • 13
    Leopold, C. and Leutner, D. (2012) Science text comprehension: Drawing, main idea selection, and summarizing as learning strategies. Learn. Instr. 22, 1626.
  • 14
    Ainsworth, S. Prain, V. and Tytler, R. (2011) Drawing to learn in science. Science 333, 10961097.
  • 15
    McNamara, T. P. Miller, D. L. and Bransford, J. D. (1991). Mental models and reading comprehension. in Brown, R., Kamil, M. L., Mosenthal, P., Person, D. P., Eds. Hand Book of Reading Research, Vol. II, Longman, New York, pp. 490511.
  • 16
    Mayer, R. E. (1989) Systematic thinking fostered by illustrations in scientific text. J. Educ. Psychol. 81, 240246.
  • 17
    vanSomeren, M. W. Boshuizen, H. P. A. deJong, T. Reimann P. (1998) Introduction. in van Someren, M. W., Reimann, P., Boshuizen, H. P. A., de Jong, T., Eds. Learning with Multiple Representations, Elsevier Science, Kidlington, Oxford.
  • 18
    Millis, B. J. and Cottell, P. G., Jr. (1998) Cooperative Learning for Higher Education Faculty, American Council on Education, Series on Higher Education, The Oryx Press, Phoenix, AZ.