• 1
    Smith, J. J., Baum, D. A., and Moore, A. (2009) The need for molecular genetic perspectives in evolutionary education (and vice versa). Trends Genet. 25, 427429.
  • 2
    Ferrari, M. and Chi, M.T.H. (1998) The nature of naïve explanations of natural selection. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 20, 12311256.
  • 3
    Robbins, J. R. and Roy P. (2007) The natural selection: Identifying and correcting non-science student preconcbmbdtions through an inquiry-based, critical approach to evolution. Am. Biol. Teach. 69, 460466.
  • 4
    Haga, S. B. (2006) Teaching resources for genetics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 7, 223229.
  • 5
    Hake, R. R. (1998) Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. Am. J. Phys. 66, 6474.
  • 6
    Crouch, C. H. and Mazur, E. (2001) Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. Am. J. Phys. 69, 970977.
  • 7
    Smith, M. K., Wood, W. B., and Knight, J. K. (2008) The genetics concbmbdt assessment: A new concbmbdt inventory for gauging student understanding of genetics. CBE Life Sci. Educ. 7, 422430.
  • 8
    Crouch, C. H., Fagen, A. P., Callan, J. P., and Mazur, E. (2004) Classroom demonstrations: Learning tools or entertainment? Am. J. Phys. 72, 825838.
  • 9
    Prince, M. (2004) Does active learning work? A review of the research. J. Eng. Educ. 93, 223231.
  • 10
    Costa, M. J. (2007) Blackboard electrophoresis. An inexpensive exercise on the principles of DNA restriction analysis. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Edu. 35, 328331.
  • 11
    Dillebourg, P., Baker, M., Blake, A., and O'Malley, C. (1995) The evolution of research on collaborative learning. In: N. Spada, P. Reimann (eds.), Learning in Humans and Machines. Towards an interdisciplinary learning science. Oxford: Elsevier.
  • 12
    Ernst, H. and Colthorpe, K. (2007) The efficacy of interactive lecturing for students with diverse science backgrounds. Adv. Physiol. Educ. 31, 4144.
  • 13
    Kember, D., Ho, A., and Hong, C. (2010) Characterising a teaching and learning environment capable of motivating student learning. Learning Environ. Res. 13, 4357.
  • 14
    Woo, Y. and Reeves, T. (2007). Meaningful interaction in web-based learning: A social constructivist interpretation". Internet Higher Educ., 10. 1525.
  • 15
    Davis, E.A., Petish, D., and Smithey, J. (2006). Challenges New science teachers face. Rev. Educ. Res. 76, 607651.
  • 16
    Dopico, E. and Garcia-Vazquez, E. (2011) Leaving the classroom. A didactic framework for education in environmental sciences. Cult. Stud. Sci. Educ. 6, 311326.
  • 17
    Pardiñas, A.F., Roca, A., Dopico, E., Garcia-Vazquez, E., and Lopez, B. (2010) Introducing human population biology through an easy laboratory exercise on mitochondrial DNA. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ. 38, 110115.
  • 18
    Lean, J., Moizer, J., Towler, M., and Abbey, C. (2006) Simulations and games. Use and barriers in higher education. Act. Learn. Higher Educ. 7, 227242.
  • 19
    Hmelo-Silver, C.E. and Barrows, H.S. (2006) Goals and strategies of a problem-based learning facilitator. Int. J. Problem-based Learn. 1, 2139.
  • 20
    Bowling, B.V., Acra, E.E., Wang, L., Myers, M.F., Dean, G.E., et al. (2008) Development and evaluation of a genetics literacy assessment instrument for undergraduates. Genetics 178, 1522.
  • 21
    Breakey, K.M., Levin, D., Miller, I., and Hentges, K.E. (2008) The use of scenario-based-learning interactive software to create custom virtual laboratory scenarios for teaching genetics. Genetics 179, 11511155.