Research Article
Do environmental social controls matter to Australian capital investment decision-making?
Article first published online: 10 JUL 2008
DOI: 10.1002/bse.622
Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. and ERP Environment
Issue
1099-0836/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=684f199c2419e4d1c2f1d662c39d1216b8131829)
Business Strategy and the Environment
Special Issue: Sustainable Social and Ecosystem Stewardship
Volume 17, Issue 5, pages 294–303, July 2008
Additional Information
How to Cite
Ross, D. G. and Wood, D. (2008), Do environmental social controls matter to Australian capital investment decision-making?. Bus. Strat. Env., 17: 294–303. doi: 10.1002/bse.622
Publication History
- Issue published online: 10 JUL 2008
- Article first published online: 10 JUL 2008
- Manuscript Accepted: 8 FEB 2008
- Manuscript Revised: 18 DEC 2007
- Manuscript Received: 18 JUN 2007
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Keywords:
- environmental social controls;
- capital investments
Abstract
This paper looks at how environmental social controls (ESCs), namely mandatory disclosure, regulation, subsidies and stakeholder opinion, are perceived in terms of their relative importance by Australian capital investment managers. We find that regulation and stakeholder opinion are the most important ESCs. Subsidies generally have less influence, while mandatory disclosure has almost no impact on capital investment decisions. However, even the more important ESCs have much less than impact than mainstream financial and strategic factors. Policy makers seeking to influence capital investment managers will have to increase the power levels of the various ESCs if they are to change behaviour. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.

1099-0836/asset/BSE_left.gif?v=1&s=bfb14dbbfd57a814a4b44ec408204df3a4e82b4d)
1099-0836/asset/BSE_right.gif?v=1&s=ed03159fb3a9ea8d2295cebff0cb2bffc256b247)