• Please log in or register to access this feature.

Special Issue Article

You have free access to this content

Violence Risk Assessment in Clinical Settings: Being Sure about Being Sure

  1. Alec Buchanan Ph.D., M.D.*

Article first published online: 28 DEC 2012

DOI: 10.1002/bsl.2045

Issue

Behavioral Sciences & the Law

Behavioral Sciences & the Law

Special Issue: Methodological Issues in Measuring and Interpreting the Predictive Validity of Violence Risk Assessments

Volume 31, Issue 1, pages 74–80, January/February 2013

Additional Information

How to Cite

Buchanan, A. (2013), Violence Risk Assessment in Clinical Settings: Being Sure about Being Sure. Behav. Sci. Law, 31: 74–80. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2045

Author Information

  1. Division of Law and Psychiatry, Yale University Department of Psychiatry, New Haven, CT, U.S.A.

*Correspondence to: Alec Buchanan, Associate Professor, Division of Law and Psychiatry, Yale University Department of Psychiatry, 34 Park Street, New Haven, CT 06519, U.S.A. E-mail: alec.buchanan@yale.edu

Publication History

  1. Issue published online: 26 FEB 2013
  2. Article first published online: 28 DEC 2012
  3. Manuscript Accepted: 6 NOV 2012
  4. Manuscript Revised: 4 NOV 2012
  5. Manuscript Received: 2 AUG 2012

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

ARTICLE TOOLS

View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (87K)

REFERENCES

  • 2010 Va. Code Ann. § 37.2-903 (B).
  • Allport, G. (1940). The psychologist's frame of reference. Psychological Bulletin, 37, 1–28.
  • Altman, D., & Royston, P. (2000). What do we mean by validating a prognostic model? Statistics in Medicine, 19, 453–473.
    Direct Link:
  • American Psychiatric Association. (1974). Task Force Report Number 8: Clinical Aspects of the Violent Individual. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Association.
  • Braitman, L., & Davidoff, F. (1996). Predicting clinical states in individual patients. Annals of Internal Medicine, 125, 406–412.
  • Broun K. (2006). McCormick on Evidence 6th ed. St. Paul: Thomson West.
  • Buchanan, A., & Leese, M. (2001). Detention of people with dangerous severe personality disorders. Lancet, 358, 1955–1959.
  • Buchanan, A., Reiss, D., & Taylor, P. (2003). Does “like predict like” when patients discharged from high secure hospitals re-offend? An instrument to describe serious offending. Psychological Medicine, 33, 549–553.
  • Buchanan, A. (2008). Risk of violence by psychiatric patients: beyond the “actuarial versus clinical” assessment debate. Psychiatric Services, 59, 184–190.
  • Carnap, R. (1963). Logical Foundations of Probability 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Cooke, D., & Michie, C. (2010). Limitations of diagnostic precision and predictive utility in the individual case: a challenge for forensic practice. Law and Human Behavior, 34, 259–274.
  • Djulbegovic, B., & Paul, A. (2011). From efficacy to effectiveness in the face of uncertainty. Indication creep and prevention creep. Journal of the American Medical Association, 305, 2005–2006.
  • Fazel, S., Singh, J., Doll, H., & Grann, M. (2012). Use of risk assessment instruments to predict violence and antisocial behaviour in 73 samples involving 24, 827 people: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ, 345, e4692.
  • Fisher, R. (1934). Statistical Methods for Research Workers 5th ed. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.
  • Franklin, J. (2006). Case comment – United States v. Copeland, 369 F.Supp.2d 275 (E.D.N.Y. 2005): quantification of the “proof beyond reasonable doubt” standard. Law, Probability and Risk, 5, 159–165.
  • Hacking, I. (2006). The Emergence of Probability 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge.
  • Hájek, A. (1997). “Mises redux” – redux. Fifteen arguments against finite frequentism. Erkenntnis, 45, 209–227.
  • Hanson, R. K., & Howard, P. (2010). Individual confidence intervals do not inform decision-makers about the accuracy of risk assessment evaluations. Law and Human Behavior, 34, 275–281.
  • Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (1999). Static 99: Improving Actuarial Risk Assessment for Sex-Offenders. Ottawa: Ministry of the Solicitor General of Canada.
  • Hart, S., Michie, C., & Cooke, D. (2007). Precision of actuarial risk assessment instruments. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 190(supp. 49), s60–s65.
  • Heit, E. (2000). Properties of inductive reasoning. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 7, 569–592.
  • Helmus, L., Hanson, R. K., Thornton, D., Babchishin, K., & Harris, A. (2012). Absolute recidivism rates predicted by Static-99R and Static-2002R sex offender risk assessment tools vary across samples. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39, 1148–1171.
  • Hofer, E. (1996). When to separate uncertainties and when not to separate. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 54, 113–118.
  • Hosmer, D., Taber, S., & Lemeshow, S. (1991). The importance of assessing the fir of logistic regression models: a case study. American Journal of Public Health, 81, 1630–1635.
  • Hutten, E. (1952). Probability-sentences. Mind, 61, 39–56.
  • Jeffreys, H. (1961). Theory of Probability 3rd ed. Oxford: Clarendon.
  • Keynes, J. M. (1921). A Treatise on Probability. London: MacMillan.
  • Kvaraceus W. (1966). Anxious Youth. Columbus, Ohio: Charles Merrill.
  • Lidz, C., Mulvey, E., & Gardner, W. (1993). The accuracy of predictions of violence to others. Journal of the American Medical Association, 269, 1007–1011.
  • Mossman, D., & Sellke, T. (2007). Avoiding errors about “margins of error”. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 191, 561.
  • Mossman, D. (2006). Another look at interpreting risk categories. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 18, 41–63.
  • O'Hagan, A., & Oakley, J. (2004). Probability is perfect, but we can't elicit it perfectly. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 85, 239–248.
  • O'Hagan, T. (2004). Dicing with the unknown. Significance, September, 132–133.
  • Pollock, J. (1983). A theory of direct inference. Theory and Decision, 15, 29–95.
  • Publisher's Editorial Staff. (2011). American Jurisprudence 2nd ed. Evidence 29, § 309. Thomson Reuters: Eagan, MN.
  • Reichenbach, H. (1938). Experience and Prediction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Robertson, B., & Vignaux, G. (1993). Probability – the logic of the law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 13, 457–478.
  • Rockhill, B. (2001). The privatization of risk. American Journal of Public Health, 91, 365–368.
  • Sarbin, T. (1944). The logic of prediction in psychology. Psychological Review, 51, 210–228.
  • Skeem, J., & Monahan, J. (2011). Current directions in violence risk assessment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 38–42.
  • Skyrms, B. (2000). Choice and Chance 4th ed. Stamford: Wadsworth.
  • Spiegelhalter, D. (2008). Understanding uncertainty. Annals of Family Medicine, 6, 196–197.
  • Taleb, N. (2007). The Black Swan: the Impact of the Highly Improbable. New York: Random House.
  • US v. Dupee 569 F.2d 1061 (1978).
  • Wald, A. (1943). Tests of statistical hypotheses concerning several parameters when the number of observations is large. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 54, 426–482.
  • Wilson, E. (1927). Probable inference, the law of succession, and statistical inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 22, 209–212.
  • Woo, G. (1999). The Mathematics of Natural Catastrophes. River Edge NJ: Imperial College Press.
View Full Article (HTML) Get PDF (87K)