Research Report
Investigating jury bias in a child molestation case
Article first published online: 13 FEB 2006
DOI: 10.1002/bsl.2370020409
Copyright © 1984 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
Additional Information
How to Cite
Deitz, S. R. and Sissman, P. L. (1984), Investigating jury bias in a child molestation case. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 2: 423–434. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2370020409
Publication History
- Issue published online: 13 FEB 2006
- Article first published online: 13 FEB 2006
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Abstract
Defendants in most criminal cases have a constitutional right to be tried by a jury, however they may waive that right and elect to be tried by a judge. In several states and the federal criminal system, waiver of a jury trial requires the consent of the prosecution. Based on a United States Supreme Court decision in Singer v. United States, a criminal defendant does not have a constitutional right to bench a trial, although the Court acknowledged that certain cases might exist in which “passion, prejudice … public feeling” or other factors might render an impartial trial by jury impossible or unlikely. The present article describes one attempt to prove the Singer exception because of strongly biased pretrial publicity in a Virginia child molestation case.

1099-0798/asset/BSL_left.gif?v=1&s=44de18487a735c420d1f360e33785735be2edbf3)
1099-0798/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=27cb3cb3b3e789b2519ed5b84bdb198bf5ddfb33)