Article

You have free access to this content

What do we really know about witness preparation?†

  1. Marcus T. Boccaccini M.A.‡,*

Article first published online: 18 APR 2002

DOI: 10.1002/bsl.472

Issue

Behavioral Sciences & the Law

Behavioral Sciences & the Law

Special Issue: Current Directions

Volume 20, Issue 1-2, pages 161–189, January - April 2002

Additional Information

How to Cite

Boccaccini, M. T. (2002), What do we really know about witness preparation?. Behav. Sci. Law, 20: 161–189. doi: 10.1002/bsl.472

Author Information

  1. Psychology Department, Box 870348, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35401, U.S.A.

  1. ‡

    Dr. Charles P. Ewing served as action editor for this article.

*Psychology Department, Box 870348, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL 35401, U.S.A.

  1. †

    I would like to thank Stanley L. Brodsky for his helpful comments on an earlier draft of this article.

Publication History

  1. Issue published online: 18 APR 2002
  2. Article first published online: 18 APR 2002

SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

ARTICLE TOOLS

Get PDF (176K)

REFERENCES

  • Acklin DE. 1987. Witness preparation: beyond the woodshed. The Air Force Law Review 27: 21–27.
  • Altman JM. 1995. Witness preparation conflicts. Litigation 22(1): 38–43, 67–68.
  • American Bar Association. 2001. ABA model rules of professional conduct. In ABA Compendium of Professional Responsibility Rules and Standards (2001 ed., pp. 1–155). Author: Chicago, IL.
  • Anthony PK, Vinson DE. 1987, Spring. Nonverbal communication in the courtroom: You don't stay! Trial Diplomacy Journal 39: 35–38.
  • Applegate JS. 1989. Witness preparation. Texas Law Review 68: 277–352.
  • Aron R, Duffy KT, Rosner JL. 1989. Cross-Examination of Witnesses: The Litigator's Puzzle. Shepard's–McGraw-Hill: Colorado Springs, CO.
  • Aron R, Rosner JL. 1998. How to Prepare Witnesses for Trial (2nd ed.). West: Danvers, MA.
  • Barry AK. 1991. Narrative style and witness testimony. Journal of Narrative and Life History 1: 281–293.
  • Baumeister RF, Darley JM. 1982. Reducing the biasing effect of perpetrator attractiveness in jury simulation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 8: 286–292.
  • Beals GW. 1996. Witness preparation and presentation. Maine Bar Journal 11(4): 228–234.
  • Bell RA, Zahn CJ, Hopper R. 1984. Disclaiming: a test of two competing views. Communication Quarterly 32: 28–36.
  • Berg DH. 1987. Preparing witnesses. Litigation 13(2): 13–16, 58.
  • Bond CF, Kahler KN, Paolicelli LM. 1985. The miscommunication of deception: an adaptive perspective. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 21: 331–345.
  • Bornstein BH. 1999. The ecological validity of jury simulations: is the jury still out? Law and Human Behavior 23: 75–91.
  • Bothwell RK, Deffenbacher KA, Brigham JC. 1987. Correlation of eyewitness accuracy and confidence: optimality hypothesis revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology 72: 691–695.
  • Bothwell RK, Jalil M. 1992. The credibility of nervous witnesses. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality 7: 581–586.
  • Bradac JJ, Hemphill MR, Tardy CH. 1981. Language style on trial: effects of ‘powerful’ and ‘powerless’ speech upon judgements of victims and villains. The Western Journal of Speech Communication 45: 327–341.
  • Brodsky SL. 1991. Testifying in Court: Guidelines and Maxims for the Expert Witness. American Psychological Association: Washington, DC.
  • Brodsky SL, Sparrow VM, Boccaccini MT. 1998. Racial inquiries in depositions and trials. The Journal of Psychiatry and Law 26: 533–545.
  • Bull-Kovera M, McAuliff BD. 1999. Child witnesses in custody cases: the effects of system and estimator variables on the accuracy of their reports. In The Scientific Basis of Child Custody Decisions (pp. 157–187), Galatzer-LevyRM, KrausL (eds). Wiley: New York.
  • Burgoon JK, Birk T, Pfau M. 1990. Nonverbal behaviors, persuasion, and credibility. Human Communication Research 17: 140–169.
    Direct Link:
  • Burgoon JK, Buller DB, Grandpre JR, Kalbfleisch P. 1988. Sex differences in presenting and detecting deceptive messages. In Sex Differences and Similarities in Communication (pp. 351–372), CanaryDJ, DindiaK (eds). Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ.
  • Burgoon M, Klingle RS. 1998. Gender differences in being influential and/or influenced: a challenge to prior explanations. In Sex Differences and Similarities in Communication (pp. 257–285), CanaryDJ, DindiaK (eds). Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ.
  • Ceci SJ, Bruck M. 1995. Jeopardy in the Courtroom: A Scientific Analysis of Children's Testimony. American Psychological Association: Washington, DC.
  • Cecil JS, Hans VP, Wiggins EC. 1991. Citizen comprehension of difficult issues: lessons from civil jury trials. The American University Law Review 40: 727–774.
  • Chaiken S, Maheswaran D. 1994. Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 66: 460–470.
  • Conley JM, O'Barr Lind EA. 1978. The power of language: presentation style in the courtroom. Duke Law Journal 1978(6): 1375–1399.
  • Cooper J, Bennett EA, Sukel HL. 1996. Complex scientific testimony: how do jurors make decisions. Law and Human Behavior 20: 379–394.
  • Cooper J, Neuhaus IM. 2000. The ‘hired gun’ effect: assessing the effect of pay, frequency of testifying, and credentials on the perception of expert testimony. Law and Human Behavior 24: 149–171.
  • Cooper JF. 1846/n.d. The Redskins: Or Indian and Injin. Co-Operative Publication Society: New York.
  • Cooper JF. 1850/1968. The Ways of the Hour. Gregg: Upper Saddle River, NJ.
  • Courtroom Performance, Inc. 1999. The Eleven Most Frequently-Asked Questions on Performance and Presentation in the Courtroom (2nd ed.) [Brochure]. Author: Taos, NM.
  • Cutler BL. 1990. The status of scientific jury selection in psychology and law. Forensic Reports 3: 227–232.
  • Cutler BL, Penrod SD, Dexter HR. 1990. Juror sensitivity to eyewitness identification evidence. Law and Human Behavior 14: 185–191.
  • Davis SD, Beisecker TD. 1994. Discovering trial consultant work product: a new way to borrow and adversary's wits? American Journal of Trial Diplomacy 17: 581–636.
  • Davitz JR, Davitz LJ. 1959. The communication of feelings by content-free speech. Journal of Communication 9: 6–13.
    Direct Link:
  • DePaulo BM, Charlton K, Cooper H, Lindsay JJ, Muhlenbruck L. 1997. The accuracy–confidence correlation in the detection of deception. Personality and Social Psychology Review 1: 346–357.
  • DePaulo BM, Kirkendol SE. 1989. The motivational impairment effect in the communication of deception. In Credibility assessment (pp. 50–69), YuilleJC (ed.). Kluwer: Boston, MA.
  • DiBlasi JP. 1993, December. Preparing your witness for trial. New York State Bar Journal 48–52.
  • Dombroff MA. 1985, November 11. Checklist can aid in effective witness preparation. Legal Times 14, 17.
  • DorisJ (ed.). 1991. The Suggestibility of Children's Recollections: Implications for Eyewitness Testimony. American Psychological Association: Washington, DC.
  • Dovidio JF, Ellyson SL, Keating CF, Heltman K, Brown CE. 1988. The relationship of social power to visual displays of dominance between men and women. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54: 233–242.
  • Ekman P. 1989. Why lies fail and what behaviors betray a lie. In Credibility Assessment (pp. 71–81), YuilleJC (ed.). Kluwer: Boston, MA.
  • Ekman P, Friesen WV. 1969. The repertoire of nonverbal behavior: categories, origins, usage, and coding. Semiotica 1: 49–97.
  • Ekman P, Freisen WV, Ellsworth P. 1982. Research foundations. In Emotion in the Human Face (2nd ed., pp. 1–6), EkmanP (ed.). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
  • Ekman P, O'Sullivan M. 1991. Who can catch a liar? American Psychologist 46: 913–920.
  • Erickson B, Lind EA, Johnson BC, O'Barr WM. 1978. Speech style and impression formulation in a court setting: the effects of ‘powerful’ and ‘powerless’ speech. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 14: 266–279.
  • Faigman DL, Baglioni AJ. 1988. Bayes' theorem in the trial process: instructing jurors on the value of statistical evidence. Law and Human Behavior 12: 1–17.
  • Feldman RS, Chesley RB. 1984. Who is lying, who is not: an attributional analysis of the effects of nonverbal behavior on judgements of defendant believability. Behavioral Sciences and the Law 2: 451–461.
    Direct Link:
  • Finlay B, Cromwell TA. 1999. Witness Preparation Manual (2nd ed.). Canada Law Book: Aurora, Ontario.
  • Follingstad DR. 1984. Preparing the witness for courtroom testimony: modifying negative behavior through employment of psychological principles. Trial 20(1): 50–58.
  • Forrest JA, Feldman RS. 2000. Detecting deception and judge's involvement: lower task involvement leads to better lie detection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 26: 118–125.
  • Frick RW. 1985. Communicating emotion: the role of prosodic features. Psychological Bulletin 97: 412–429.
  • GoodmanGS, BottomsBL (eds). 1993. Child Victims, Child Witnesses: Understanding and Improving Testimony. Guilford: New York.
  • Goodman J, Greene E, Loftus EF. 1985. What confuses jurors in complex cases. Trial 21(11): 65–74.
  • Hall JA, Carter JD, Horgan TG. 2000. Gender differences in nonverbal communication of emotion. In Gender and Emotion: Social Psychological Perspectives (pp. 97–117), FischerAH (ed.). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
  • Harper RB, Wiens AN, Matarazzo JD. 1978. Nonverbal Communication: The State of the Art. Wiley: New York.
  • Harrigan JA, Harrigan KM, Sale BA, Rosenthal R. 1996. Detecting anxiety and defensiveness from visual and auditory cues. Journal of Personality 64: 675–709.
    Direct Link:
  • Harrigan JA, Lucic KS, Bailyn L, Zarnowiecki S, Rosenthal R. 1992. Judging others' anxiety. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 22: 855–873.
    Direct Link:
  • Harrigan JA, Taing KT. 1997. Fooled by a smile: detecting anxiety in others. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 21: 203–221.
  • Hemsley GD, Doob AN. 1978. The effect of looking behavior on perceptions of a communicator's credibility. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 8: 136–144.
    Direct Link:
  • Herndon WW, Karl JJ. 1978. Demonstration: preparation of a witness to testify. Antitrust Law Journal 1: 123–140.
  • Hocking JE, Miller GR, Fontes NE. 1978. Videotape in the courtroom: witness deception. Trial 14(4): 52–55.
  • Hosman LA. 1989. The evaluative consequences of hedges, hesitations, and intensifiers: powerful and powerless speech styles. Human Communication Research 15: 383–406.
    Direct Link:
  • Hosman LA, Wright JW. 1987. The effects of hedges and hesitations on impression formation in a simulated courtroom context. Western Journal of Speech Communication 51: 173–188.
  • Hurwitz SD, Miron MS, Johnson BT. 1992. Source credibility and the language of expert testimony. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 22: 1909–1939.
    Direct Link:
  • Israel SM. 1999. The ethics of witness preparation. Labor and Employment Lawnotes 9(2): 6–8.
  • Jacobs TRZ. 1998. Effective witness preparation. Trial Lawyer 21(5): 285–286.
  • Johnson C, Vinson L. 1987, Spring. Damned if you do, damned if you don't?: Status, powerful speech, and evaluations of female witnesses. Women's Studies in Communication 10: 31–44.
  • Johnson SL. 1996. The color of truth: race and the assessment of credibility. Michigan Journal of Race and Law 1: 261–346.
  • Jones M. 1997. Preventing the application of stereotypic biases in the courtroom. The role of detailed testimony. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 27: 1767–1784.
    Direct Link:
  • Kerper J. 1998. Preparing a witness for deposition. Litigation 24(4): 11–15, 71.
  • Kerrigan PJ. 1999. Witness preparation. Texas Tech Law Review 30: 1367–1382.
  • Kleinke CL. 1986. Gaze and eye contact: a research review. Psychological Bulletin 100: 78–100.
  • Leathers DG. 1997. Successful Nonverbal Communication (3rd ed.). Allyn and Bacon: Boston.
  • LeVan EA. 1984. Nonverbal communication in the courtroom: attorney beware. Law and Psychology Review 8: 83–104.
  • Lind EA, Erickson B, Conley JM, O'Barr WM. 1978. Social attributions and conversational style in trial testimony. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 36: 1558–1567.
  • Lisko KO. 1992. Juror Perceptions of Witness Credibility as a Function of Linguistic and Nonverbal Power. Doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas.
  • Loftus EF. 1975. Leading questions and the eyewitness report. Cognitive Psychology 7: 560–572.
  • Loftus EF, Hoffman HG. 1989. Misinformation and memory: The creation of new memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 118: 100–104.
  • Maciejczyk JM. 1996. Effective deposition witness preparation. Res Gestae 39(9): 28–36.
  • Magner ES, Markham R, Barnett C. 1996. Would reading an account of an event refresh your memory? Journal of Applied Psychology 81: 769–776.
  • Malone DM. 1998. Talking green, showing red: why most deposition preparation fails, and what to do about it. Litigation 24(4): 27–30, 69–70.
  • McElhaney JW. 1987. Horse-shedding the witness: techniques for witness preparation. Trial 23(10): 80–84.
  • McElhaney JW. 2001, April. Looking for the good guy: witnesses don't have to be pretty—just simple and direct. ABA Journal 68–69.
  • Mehrabian A. 1981. Silent Messages (2nd ed.). Wadsworth: Belmont, CA.
  • Mehrabian A, Friedman SL. 1986. An analysis of fidgeting and associated individual differences. Journal of Personality 54: 406–429.
    Direct Link:
  • Milgram S. 1963. Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 67: 371–378.
  • Miller GG, deTurck MA, Kalbfleisch P. 1983. Self-monitoring, rehearsal, and deceptive communication. Human Communication Research 10: 97–117.
    Direct Link:
  • Miller MO. 1993. Working with memory. Litigation 19(4): 10–16.
  • Miller N, Maruyama G, Beaber RJ, Valone K. 1976. Speed of speech and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 34: 615–624.
  • Moore DL, Hausknecht D, Thamodaran K. 1986. Time compression, response opportunity, and persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research 13: 85–99.
  • Nelson NC. 1999. Expert witness preparation: Know what you're getting before your expert takes the stand. The Practical Litigator 10(4): 55–59.
  • Nietzel MT, Dillehay RC. 1986. Psychological Consultation in the Courtroom. Pergamon: New York.
  • O'Barr WM. 1982. Linguistic Evidence: Language, Power, and Strategy in the Courtroom. Academic: New York.
  • O'Barr WM, Conley JM. 1976. When a juror watches a lawyer. Barrister 3(2): 8–11, 33.
  • Parkinson MG. 1981. Verbal behavior and courtroom success. Communication Education 30: 22–32.
  • Parkinson MG, Geisler D, Pelias MH. 1983. The effects of verbal skills on trial success. Journal of the American Forensic Association 20: 16–22.
  • Penrod S, Cutler B. 1995. Witness confidence and witness accuracy: assessing their forensic relation. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 1: 817–845.
  • Peters W, Nunez N. 1999. Complex language comprehension monitoring: teaching witnesses to recognize linguistic confusion. Journal of Applied Psychology 84: 661–669.
  • Petty RE, Cacioppo JT. 1986. The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123–205), BerkowitzL (ed.). Academic: New York.
  • Petty RE, Wegener DT. 1999. The elaboration likelihood model: current status and controversies. In Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology, ChaikenS, TropeY (eds). Guilford: New York; 41–72.
  • Pryor B, Buchanan RW. 1984. The effects of a defendant's demeanor on juror perceptions of credibility and guilt. Journal of Communication 34: 92–99.
    Direct Link:
  • Rand JW. 2000. The demeanor gap: race, lie detection, and the jury. Connecticut Law Review 33: 1–76.
  • Reskin BF, Visher CA. 1986. The impacts of evidence and extralegal factors in jurors' decisions. Law and Society Review 20: 423–438.
  • Ryan ME, Svaldi D. 1993. Women in the courtroom: increasing credibility through nonverbal behavior change. Trial Diplomacy Journal 16: 253–259.
  • Salekin RT, Ogloff JRP, McFarland C, Rogers R. 1995. Influencing jurors' perceptions of guilt: expressions of emotionality during testimony. Behavioral Sciences and the Law 13: 293–305.
    Direct Link:
  • Salmi LR. 1999. Don't walk the line: ethical consideration in preparing witnesses for deposition and trial. The Review of Litigation 18: 135–179.
  • Saywitz KJ, Snyder L. 1993. Improving children's testimony with preparation. In Child Victims, Child Witnesses: Understanding and Improving Testimony (pp. 117–146), GoodmanGS, BottomsBL (eds). Guilford: New York.
  • Saywitz KJ, Snyder L, Nathanson R. 1999. Facilitating the communicative competence of the child witness. Applied Developmental Science 3: 58–68.
  • Scherer KR, London H, Wolf JJ. 1973. The voice of confidence: paralinguistic cues and audience evaluation. Journal of Research in Personality 7: 31–44.
  • Selkirk AM. 1992. Witness preparation: key to successful trial strategy. New York State Bar Journal 64(2): 18–23.
  • Shartel JS. 1994. Litigators describe key factors in use of jury consultants. Inside Litigation 8(7): 1, 23–29.
  • Shaw JS III. 1996. Increases in eyewitness confidence resulting from postevent questioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 12: 126–146.
  • Shaw JS III, McClure KA. 1996. Repeated postevent questioning can lead to lead to elevated levels of eyewitness confidence. Law and Human Behavior 20: 629–654.
  • Small DI. 1998. Preparing Witnesses: A Practical Guide for Lawyers and Their Clients. American Bar Association: Chicago, IL.
  • Smith LJ, Malandro LA. 1985. Courtroom Communication Strategies. Kluwer: New York.
  • Spanos NP, Quigley CA, Gwynn MI, Glatt RL, Perlini AH. 1991. Hypnotic interrogation, pretrial preparation, and witness testimony during direct and cross-examination. Law and Human Behavior 15: 639–653.
  • Stiff JB, Miller GR. 1986. ‘Come to think of it…’: interrogative probes, deceptive communication, and deception detection. Human Communication Research 19: 326–345.
  • Thompson WC, Schumann EL. 1987. Interpretation of statistical evidence in criminal trials: the prosecutor's fallacy and the defense attorney's fallacy. Law and Human Behavior 11: 167–187.
  • Turtle JW, Yuille JC. 1994. Lost but not forgotten: repeated eyewitness recall leads to reminiscence but not hypermnesia. Journal of Applied Psychology 79: 260–271.
  • Vogel LH. 1952. Preparation of witnesses for trial: horse-shedding the witness. Insurance Counsel Journal 19: 394–399.
  • Wagstaff TW. 1989. Witness preparation. University of Missouri Kansas City Law Review 57: 763–768.
  • Weinstein JB. 1957. The law's attempt to obtain useful testimony. The Journal of Social Issues 13: 6–11.
    Direct Link:
  • Weiten W, Diamond SS. 1979. A critical review of the jury simulation paradigm: the case of defendant characteristics. Law and Human Behavior 3: 71–93.
  • Wells GL, Ferguson TJ, Lindsay RCL. 1981. The tractability of eyewitness confidence and its implications for triers of fact. Journal of Applied Psychology 66: 688–696.
  • Wright JW, Hosman LA. 1983. Language style and sex bias in the courtroom: the effects of male and female use of hedges and intensifiers on impression formation. The Southern Speech Communication Journal 48: 137–152.
  • Wydick RC. 1995. The ethics of witness coaching. Cardozo Law Review 17: 1–52.
  • Zuckerman M, DePaulo BM, Rosenthal R. 1981a. Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 1–59), BerkowitzL (ed.). Academic: New York.
  • Zuckerman M, Koestner R, Driver R. 1981b. Beliefs about cues associated with deception. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 6: 105–114.
  • Zuckerman M, Larrance DT, Spiegel NH, Klorman R. 1981c. Controlling nonverbal displays: facial expressions and tone of voice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 17: 506–524.
Get PDF (176K)