Dr. Charles P. Ewing served as action editor for this article.
Article
Death row inmate characteristics, adjustment, and confinement: a critical review of the literature†‡
Article first published online: 18 APR 2002
DOI: 10.1002/bsl.473
Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Issue
1099-0798/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=27cb3cb3b3e789b2519ed5b84bdb198bf5ddfb33)
Behavioral Sciences & the Law
Special Issue: Current Directions
Volume 20, Issue 1-2, pages 191–210, January - April 2002
Additional Information
How to Cite
Cunningham, M. D. and Vigen, M. P. (2002), Death row inmate characteristics, adjustment, and confinement: a critical review of the literature. Behav. Sci. Law, 20: 191–210. doi: 10.1002/bsl.473
- †
- ‡
The authors wish to thank C. Piotrowski for his review and helpful comments on this manuscript.
Publication History
- Issue published online: 18 APR 2002
- Article first published online: 18 APR 2002
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Abstract
This article reviews and summarizes research on death row inmates. The contributions and weaknesses of death row demographic data, clinical studies, and research based on institutional records are critiqued. Our analysis shows that death row inmates are overwhelmingly male and disproportionately Southern. Racial representation remains controversial. Frequently death row inmates are intellectually limited and academically deficient. Histories of significant neurological insult are common, as are developmental histories of trauma, family disruption, and substance abuse. Rates of psychological disorder among death row inmates are high, with conditions of confinement appearing to precipitate or aggravate these disorders. Contrary to expectation, the extant research indicates that the majority of death row inmates do not exhibit violence in prison even in more open institutional settings. These findings have implications for forensic mental health sentencing evaluations, competent attorney representation, provision of mental health services, racial disparity in death sentences, death row security and confinement policies, and moral culpability considerations. Future research directions on death row populations are suggested. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

1099-0798/asset/BSL_left.gif?v=1&s=44de18487a735c420d1f360e33785735be2edbf3)