Dennis P. Stolle is an associate attorney with the Litigation Department of Barnes & Thornburg
Article
Fractional factorial designs for legal psychology
Article first published online: 17 APR 2002
DOI: 10.1002/bsl.475
Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Issue
1099-0798/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=27cb3cb3b3e789b2519ed5b84bdb198bf5ddfb33)
Behavioral Sciences & the Law
Special Issue: Current Directions
Volume 20, Issue 1-2, pages 5–17, January - April 2002
Additional Information
How to Cite
Stolle, D. P., Robbennolt, J. K., Patry, M. and Penrod, S. D. (2002), Fractional factorial designs for legal psychology. Behav. Sci. Law, 20: 5–17. doi: 10.1002/bsl.475
Publication History
- Issue published online: 17 APR 2002
- Article first published online: 17 APR 2002
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Abstract
Researchers considering novel or exploratory psycholegal research are often able to easily generate a sizable list of independent variables (IVs) that might influence a measure of interest. Where the research question is novel and the literature is not developed, however, choosing from among a long list of potential variables those worthy of empirical investigation often presents a formidable task. Many researchers may feel compelled by legal psychology's heavy reliance on full-factorial designs to narrow the IVs under investigation to two or three in order to avoid an expensive and unwieldy design involving numerous high-order interactions. This article suggests that fractional factorial designs provide a reasonable alternative to full-factorial designs in such circumstances because they allow the psycholegal researcher to examine the main effects of a large number of factors while disregarding high-order interactions. An introduction to the logic of fractional factorial designs is provided and several examples from the social sciences are presented. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

1099-0798/asset/BSL_left.gif?v=1&s=44de18487a735c420d1f360e33785735be2edbf3)