Practitioner's Corner
Feigning≠malingering: a case study
Article first published online: 17 JUN 2002
DOI: 10.1002/bsl.490
Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Issue
1099-0798/asset/cover.gif?v=1&s=27cb3cb3b3e789b2519ed5b84bdb198bf5ddfb33)
Behavioral Sciences & the Law
Special Issue: Disability, Public Policy, and Employment
Volume 20, Issue 6, pages 717–726, November/December 2002
Additional Information
How to Cite
DeClue, G. (2002), Feigning≠malingering: a case study. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 20: 717–726. doi: 10.1002/bsl.490
Publication History
- Issue published online: 2 DEC 2002
- Article first published online: 17 JUN 2002
- Abstract
- References
- Cited By
Abstract
Researchers and scholars assert that feigning should not be equated with malingering. Some practicing clinicians doing the everyday work of forensic assessment may view this as merely an academic distinction. This case study illustrates that a high level of certainty about feigning must not be considered indicative of malingering. The case also contrasts two models for assessing malingering and highlights the need for forensic examiners to present assessment-of-malingering data clearly and cautiously. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

1099-0798/asset/BSL_left.gif?v=1&s=44de18487a735c420d1f360e33785735be2edbf3)