Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, U.S.A.
The effect of the psychopathy checklist – revised in capital cases: Mock jurors' responses to the label of psychopathy
Article first published online: 7 SEP 2010
Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Behavioral Sciences & the Law
Volume 28, Issue 6, pages 878–891, November/December 2010
How to Cite
Cox, J., DeMatteo, D. S. and Foster, E. E. (2010), The effect of the psychopathy checklist – revised in capital cases: Mock jurors' responses to the label of psychopathy. Behav. Sci. Law, 28: 878–891. doi: 10.1002/bsl.958
- Issue published online: 25 NOV 2010
- Article first published online: 7 SEP 2010
This article has been cited by:
- 1A contrastive analysis of the factorial structure of the PCL-R: Which model fits best the data?, The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 2015, 7, 1, 23, , , ,
- 2The Role of Psychopathic and Antisocial Personality Traits in Violence Risk Assessment: Implications for Forensic Practice, Psychiatric Annals, 2015, 45, 4, 175,
- 3Potential labeling effects: influence of psychopathy diagnosis, defendant age, and defendant gender on mock jurors' decisions, Psychology, Crime & Law, 2014, 20, 2, 116, ,