SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

Resources Mentioned in the Article

  • 1
    U¸ak, N. O., & Al, U. (September 2009). The differences among disciplines in scholarly communication: A bibliometric analysis of theses. Libri, 59(3), 166179.
  • 2
    Linmans, A. (May 2010). Why with bibliometrics the humanities does not need to be the weakest link: Indicators for research evaluation based on citations, library holdings, and productivity measures. Scientometrics, 83(2), 337354.
  • 3
    Hellqvist, B. (February 2010). Referencing in the humanities and its implications for citation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(2), 310318.
  • 4
    Cronin, B., Shaw, D., & La Barre, K. (July 2003). A cast of thousands: Coauthorship and subauthorship collaboration in the 20th century as manifested in the scholarly journal literature of psychology and philosophy. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(9), 855871.
  • 5
    Weedman, J. (December 1993). On the “isolation” of humanists: A report of an invisible college. Communication Research, 20(6), 749776.
  • 6
    Collins, R. (1998). The sociology of philosophies: A global theory of intellectual change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
  • 7
    Morrow, D., & Sula, C. (September 2011). Naturalized metaphilosophy. Synthese, 182(2), 297313.
  • 8
    Green, C. (1991). The development and maintenance of collegial faculty relationships: A case study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, Eugene.
  • 9
    Herman, I., Melancon, G., & Marshall, M. (January-March 2000). Graph visualization and navigation in information visualization: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 6(1), 2443.
  • 10
    Brandeis, U., & Nick, B. (December 2011). Asymmetric relations in longitudinal social networks. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 17(12), 22832290.