Special Section: What, Why And Where?
Are alternative metrics still alternative?
Version of Record online: 15 APR 2013
Copyright © 2013 American Society for Information Science and Technology
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
Volume 39, Issue 4, pages 35–39, April/May 2013
How to Cite
Buschman, M. and Michalek, A. (2013), Are alternative metrics still alternative?. Bul. Am. Soc. Info. Sci. Tech., 39: 35–39. doi: 10.1002/bult.2013.1720390411
- Issue online: 15 APR 2013
- Version of Record online: 15 APR 2013
Resources Mentioned in the Article
- 12005). Earlier web usage statistics as predictors of later citation impact. Retrieved March 5, 2013, from http://arxiv.org/ftp/cs/papers/0503/0503020.pdf.& (
- 3Public Library of Science. (November 2012). Citations are only a small fraction of how a paper is reused [slide]. Article Level Metrics: Analyzing Value in the Scholarly Content. Presentation by Richard Cave at the Charleston Conference 2012, Charleston, SC, November 7–10, 2012.
- 4National Institutes of Health. (2012). Research project grants: Applications, awards, and success rates [chart]. Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools (RePORTS). Retrieved March 5, 2013, from http://report.nih.gov/NIHDatabook/Charts/Default.aspx?showm=Y&chartId=20&catId=2.
- 52013). 2013 Annual Letter from Bill Gates. Gates Foundation. Retrieved March 6, 2013, from http://annualletter.gatesfoundation.org/.(
- 62012). Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries. Scientometrics, 90, 891–904. Retrieved March 6, 2013, from http://eloquentscience.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Fanelli12-NegativeResults.pdf.(