Parasitic conjoined twins: external, internal (fetuses in fetu and teratomas), and detached (acardiacs)

Authors

  • Rowena Spencer

    Corresponding author
    • 1516 Soniat Street, New Orleans, LA 70115-4034
    Search for more papers by this author
    • Fax: (504) 895-2215

    • Rowena Spencer was formerly an Associate Professor of Surgery, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, and a Clinical Associate Professor of Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine


  • This article was adapted from the forthcoming book, Conjoined Twins: Embryology, Pathogenesis, and Review of the Literature, by Rowena Spencer, to be published by The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Abstract

During the course of researching the embryologic etiology of conjoined twins, more than 1260 individual cases were collected from the literature and the reported abnormal anatomy tabulated and evaluated in the light of known embryology. It soon became apparent that the association of conjoined twins and their parasites with fetuses in fetu, acardiacs, and teratomas was more frequent than could be attributed to chance. These anomalous fetuses form a continuum, strongly suggesting that they are all variations of abnormal conjoined twinning, with the site of union and the extent of damage (or defect) of one embryo resulting in (1) an externally attached parasitic twin, (2) an enclosed fetus in fetu, (3) an internal teratoma, or (4) an acardiac connected via the placenta. Common patterns among them are a family history of twinning, the predominance of females, and the frequent presence of a twin or triplet accompanying the malformation. The several reports of chromosomal abnormality suggest that perhaps, at least on occasion, it is a genetically imperfect embryo that develops into a defective fetus. Of singular importance is the fact that rarely, if ever, is either a functional heart or a competent brain found in any of these abnormal fetuses, suggesting that the etiology of all of them is a primary cardiac malformation with secondary disruption in the development of the brain. Clin. Anat. 6:428–444, 2001. © 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Ancillary