SEARCH

SEARCH BY CITATION

REFERENCES

  • 1
    A. A. Deshpande and S. H. Huang, Simulation games in engineering education: A state-of-the-art review, Comput Appl Eng Educ 19 (2011), 399410.
  • 2
    B. Deliktas, Computer technology for enhancing teaching and learning modules of engineering mechanics, Comput Appl Eng Educ 19 (2011), 421432.
  • 3
    J. Llado and B. Sanchez, A computer-based tool to foster engineering students' interest in dynamics, Comput Appl Eng Educ 19 (2011), 475486.
  • 4
    S. Aradag, K. Cohen, C. A. Seaver, and T. McLaughlin, Integration of computations and experiments for flow control research with undergraduate students, Comput Appl Eng Educ 18 (2010), 727735.
  • 5
    C. Lafountain, K. Cohen, and S. Abdallah, Use of XFOIL in design of camber-controlled morphing UAVs, Comput Appl Eng Educ 20 (2012), 673680.
  • 6
    M. Karp, Aviation Education for Future Pilots: An Integrated Model, Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation and Education Conference, 1998.
  • 7
    E. Niemi, Use of MS flight simulator in the teaching of the introduction to avionics course, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2002.
  • 8
    I. Cotoi and M. Botez, The use of flight simulators for experiments in aerodynamic courses, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2001.
  • 9
    F. Holzapfel, I. Sturhan, and G. Sachs, Low-Cost PC based flight simulator for education and research, AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference and Exhibit, Monterey, CA, 2002.
  • 10
    T. Rogalski, A. Tomczyk, and G. Kopecki, Flight simulator as a tool for flight control system synthesis and handling qualities research, Solid State Phenomena 147 (2009), 231236.
  • 11
    H. C. Smith, Teaching flight test engineering with a pc-based simulator, Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2001.
  • 12
    M. J. Khan, M. Rossi, and S. F. Ali, Using a low cost flight simulation environment for interdisciplinary education, Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2004.
  • 13
    A. Tomczyk, The flying laboratory for aeronautics students' education, Aircraft Eng Aerosp Technol 82 (2010), 320330.
  • 14
    M. C. Cotting, L. S. McCue, and W. C. Durham, Simulator-based flight test engineering as a capstone to the dynamics and control curriculum, Proceedings of 45th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, NV, 2007.
  • 15
    S. S. Twigg and E. N. Johnson, Use of real time simulation in a laboratory course, Proceedings of ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, 2003.
  • 16
    M. Guzdial, P. Ludovice, M. Realff, T. Morley, K. Carroll, A. Ladak, The challenge of collaborative learning in engineering math, 31st Annual Frontiers in Education Conference, NY, 2001.
  • 17
    G. Kalonji, Capturing the imagination: High-priority reforms for engineering education. Educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering education to the new century, National Academics Press, Washington, DC, 2005, pp 146450.
  • 18
    E. Seymour and M. N. Hewitt, Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences, Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 1997.
  • 19
    F. Pajares, and D. H. Schunk, Self-Beliefs and School Success: Self-Efficacy, Self-Concept, and School Achivement, Perception (2001), 239266.
  • 20
    S. E. Cross and N. V. Vick, The interdependent self-construal and social support: The case of persistence in engineering, Pers Soc Psychol Bull 27 (2001), 820832.
  • 21
    A. Bandura, Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning, Educ Psychol 28 (1993), 117148.
  • 22
    D. E. Hoak and R. D. Finck, The USAF stability and control DATCOM, Air Force Wright Aeronautical Laboratories, TR-83-3048, Oct. 1960 (Revised 1978).
  • 23
    J. Husman, C. Lynch, J. Hilpert, and M. A. Duggan, Validating measures of future time perspective for engineering students: Steps toward improving engineering education, American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, Honolulu, HI, 2007.
  • 24
    P. R. Pintrich, D. Smith, T. Garcia, and W. Mckeachie, Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ), Educ Psychol Meas 53 (1993), 801814.
  • 25
    S. Yasar, Discourse in freshman engineering teams: The relationship between verbal persuasions, self-efficacy, and achievement, ProQuest (2008).
  • 26
    A. Bandura, Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents, Information Age Publishing, Charlotte, NC, 2006, pp 307337.
  • 27
    P. Chen, Exploring the accuracy and predictability of the self-efficacy beliefs of seventh-grade mathematics students, Learn Individ Differ 14 (2003), 7992.
  • 28
    A. Zusho, P. R. Pintrich, and B. Coppola, Skill and will: The role of motivation and cognition in the learning of college chemistry, Int J Sci Educ 25 (2003), 10811094.
  • 29
    M. T. Brannick, D. E. Miles, and J. L. Kisamore, Calibration between student mastery and self-efficacy, Stud Higher Educ 30 (2005), 473483.
  • 30
    G. Stump, J. Hilpert, J. Husman, W.-T. Chung, and W. Kim, Collaborative learning in engineering students: Gender and achievement, J Eng Educ 100 (2011), 475497.
  • 31
    W.-T. Chung, J. Lee, J. Husman, G. Stump, C. Maez, and A. Done, Connecting to the future: How the perception of future impact engineering undergraduate students' learning and performance, Proceedings of the Frontiers in Engineering Conference, San Antonio, TX, 2009.