People with intellectual disability as neighbours: Towards understanding the mundane aspects of social integration
Version of Record online: 30 APR 2010
Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology
Volume 20, Issue 5, pages 347–362, September/October 2010
How to Cite
van Alphen, L. M., Dijker, A. J. M., van den Borne, B. H. W. and Curfs, L. M. G. (2010), People with intellectual disability as neighbours: Towards understanding the mundane aspects of social integration. J. Community. Appl. Soc. Psychol., 20: 347–362. doi: 10.1002/casp.1042
- Issue online: 23 AUG 2010
- Version of Record online: 30 APR 2010
- Manuscript Accepted: 11 FEB 2010
- social integration;
- intellectual disability;
- qualitative interviewing
Although people with intellectual disabilities (ID) are increasingly expected to relocate from traditional institutional care to ‘regular’ neighbourhood housing facilities and socially integrate in these neighbourhoods, little is known about how they are perceived and appreciated as neighbours. This paper reports on interviews carried out with 30 neighbours without ID who were neighbours of small-scale care facilities for people with ID. Interviews addressed the neighbours' everyday experiences of neighbouring in general, and neighbouring people with ID in particular. Neighbouring, for these informants, called for a fine balance between friendliness without over-involvement. While they were generally positive about their interactions with their neighbours with ID, it emerged that the formal nature of the care facility and the interaction style of some of the neighbours with ID often contravened informants' assumptions about neighbouring. Informants expressed concern about a possible lack of appropriate distance, reciprocity and accountability among their neighbours with ID. The nature of the care facility, with paid staff, often group activities, formal means of achieving the everyday small tasks which neighbours sometimes do for each other, and a high turnover of residents, all undermined the possibility of a typical neighbourly relationship. In conclusion, we suggest that integration of people with ID into everyday neighbouring relationships raises complex challenges for care organizations that need to find a balance between supporting the needs of people with ID they care for, adequate support and mediation for other neighbours when necessary, and all the while avoid becoming overly involved in neighbouring as a formal partner. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.