• Ballantine PW, Martin BAS. 2005. Forming parasocial relationships in online communities. Advances in Consumer Research 32: 197202.
  • Barak A, Boniel-Nissim M, Suler J. 2008. Fostering empowerment in online support groups. Computers in Human Behavior 24(5): 18671883.
  • Buchanan H, Coulson NS. 2007. Accessing dental anxiety online support groups: an exploratory qualitative study of motives and experiences. Patient Education & Counseling 66(3): 263269.
  • Chan KW, Li SY. 2010. Understanding consumer-to-consumer interactions in virtual communities: the salience of reciprocity. Journal of Business Research 63(9/10): 10331040.
  • Coulson NS, Buchanan H, Aubeeluck A. 2007. Social support in cyberspace: a content analysis of communication within a Huntington's disease online support group. Patient Education & Counseling 68(2): 173178.
  • Cronbach L. 1951. Coefficient Alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16(3): 297334.
  • Dalgard OS. 2010. Social support: definition and scope. Available at [accessed on 18 January 2011].
  • Eysenbach G, Powell J, Englesakis M, Rizo C, Stern A. 2004. Health related virtual communities and electronic support groups: systematic review of the effects of online peer to peer interactions. British Medical Journal 328. doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7449.1166.
  • Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE, Tatham RL. 2006. Multivariate Data Analysis. Pearson Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ.
  • Hwang KO, Ottenbacher AJ, Green AP, Cannon-Diehl MR, Richardson O, Bernstam EV, Thomas EJ. 2010. Social support in an Internet weight loss community. International Journal of Medical Informatics 79: 513.
  • Jayanti RK, Singh J. 2010. Pragmatic learning theory: an inquiry-action framework for distributed consumer learning in online communities. Journal of Consumer Research 36(6): 10581081.
  • Kozinets RV. 1999. E-tribalized marketing?: the strategic implications of virtual communities of consumption. European Management Journal 17(3): 252264.
  • Milligan GW. 1980. An examination of the effect of six types of error perturbation on fifteen clustering algorithms. Psychometrika 45(3): 325342.
  • Moisio R, Beruchashvili M. 2010. Questing for well-being at Weight Watchers: the role of the spiritual-therapeutic model in a support group. Journal of Consumer Research 36(5): 857875.
  • Moran E, Gossieaux F. 2010. Marketing in a hyper-social world: the tribalization of business study and characteristics of successful online communities. Journal of Advertising Research 50(3): 232239.
  • Rafaeli S, Ravid G, Soroka V. 2004. De-lurking in virtual communities: a social communication network approach to measuring the effects of social and cultural capital. Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
  • Shen Y, Huang C, Chu C, Liao H. 2010. Virtual community loyalty: an interpersonal-interaction perspective. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 15(1): 4973.
  • Teoh AN, Chia MSC, Mohanraj V. 2009. The comparison between active and passive types of social support: the emotional responses. Journal of Applied Biobehavioral Research 14(2): 90102.
  • Turner JW, Grube JA, Meyers J. 2001. Developing an optimal match within online communities: an exploration of CMC support communities and traditional support. Journal of Communication 51(2): 231251.
  • Wangberg SC, Andreassen HK, Prokosch H, Santana SMV, Sorensen T, Chronaki CE. 2007. Relations between Internet use, socio-economic status (SES), social support and subjective health. Health Promotion International 23(1): 7077.
  • Wing RR, Jeffery RW. 1999. Benefits of recruiting participants with friends and increasing social support for weight loss and maintenance. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 67(1): 132138.
  • Wright KB, Rains S, Banas J. 2010. Weak-tie support network preference and perceived life stress among participants in health-related, computer-mediated support groups. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 15(4): 606624.
  • Wu J, Chen Y, Chung Y. 2010. Trust factors influencing virtual community members: a study of transaction communities. Journal of Business Research 63(9/10): 10251032.