Standard Article

In pregnant women, is there randomized controlled trial evidence to support the use of cardiotocography instead of intermittent auscultation of the fetal heart rate?

  1. Ahizechukwu Chigoziem Eke

Published Online: 24 JUN 2013

DOI: 10.1002/cca.133

Cochrane Clinical Answers

How to Cite

In pregnant women, is there randomized controlled trial evidence to support the use of cardiotocography instead of intermittent auscultation of the fetal heart rate? Ahizechukwu Chigoziem Eke (MD, MPH, FWACS, FICS) (on behalf of Cochrane Clinical Answers Editors). Cochrane Clinical Answers 2013. DOI: 10.1002/cca.133.

  1. CCA Associate editor: Ahizechukwu Chigoziem Eke (MD, MPH, FWACS, FICS), Maternal Fetal Medicine Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

  2. CCA Editor: Karen Pettersen. Correspondence to kpettersen@wiley.com.

Publication History

  1. Publication Status: Archived
  2. Published Online: 24 JUN 2013

SEARCH

Options for accessing this content:

  • If you are a society or association member and require assistance with obtaining online access instructions please contact our Journal Customer Services team.
    http://wiley.force.com/Interface/ContactJournalCustomerServices_V2.
  • Login via other institutional login options http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/login-options.
  • You can purchase online access to this Article for a 24-hour period (price varies by title)
    • If you already have a Wiley Online Library or Wiley InterScience user account: login above and proceed to purchase the article.
    • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.

Login via OpenAthens

or

Search for your institution's name below to login via Shibboleth.

Please register to:

  • Save publications, articles and searches
  • Get email alerts
  • Get all the benefits mentioned below!

Register now >